LeftColumnBK

Dendron OK's Zoning for Coal Plant

dendron-overview
A computer-generated graphic of where the coal plant would be situated in Dendron.
The Virginian-Pilot is reporting that the Dendron Town Council voted late Monday to approve a  zoning ordinance that clears the way for a coal-fired energy plant in the town of about 300.

The vote was tight, with three council members voting to abstain and hold off a vote and three voting to go ahead. Mayor Yvonne Pierce cast the tie-breaking vote with her nod to decide last night. The vote came around midnight, after hours of debate between more than 100 citizens who spoke.

The Old Dominion Electric Cooperative wants to build the plant, called Cypress Creek, on some 1600 acres in Dendron and Surry County. Some residents - including William and Mary professors and those who live in the Historic Triangle - are concerned about the negative health effects the plant would have because of mercury emissions and more; ODEC officials say its technology amounts to the cleanest coal plant available and disagree with those who say otherwise.

The Surry County Board of Supervisors will hold a hearing on the zoning changes Thursday night.

The small town would get a huge economic boost if the plant were to locate there. Read more about the history of the plant here.

Comments  

 
-1 #12 Guest 2010-02-03 14:15
Quoting Jake:
Your anger and unilateralism, Farmer, remind me of many in the Party of No. As to alternative energies, there is much to be said of wind and solar - - but fossil is always cheaper... And your comments about Haiti speak volumes. You and Pat Robertson clearly have sold your souls to the devil. Best wishes to you both.


Quoting Jake:
Your anger and unilateralism, Farmer, remind me of many in the Party of No. As to alternative energies, there is much to be said of wind and solar - - but fossil is always cheaper... And your comments about Haiti speak volumes. You and Pat Robertson clearly have sold your souls to the devil. Best wishes to you both.


Jake, thanks for your comments.

Fossil is only cheaper as long as you ignore the indirect costs such as health cost, environmental damage, lost farm land productivity etc. etc.

With better environmental legislation with some real teeth in it (fines, carbon tax etc.) to help offset these indirect costs and a few more years research into solar/wind and battery technology, the tables could easily be turned so that clean energy would be cheaper.

This would benefit everyone, regardless of political persuasion in the form of better health, lower health costs, cleaner water, cleaner air, more productive croplands, less mountain top removal/destruc tion, less/no need for offshore drilling (it is only getting more valuable while sitting in the ground, and year by year easier and more environmentally sound to retrieve).

What happens with the fossil fuels run out, what will we make plastics and fertilizer and all the other products we consume when this valuable resource runs out. Think sustainability, think conservation, think recycle, or just think Mr Farmer (not)!
Quote
 
 
+1 #11 Guest 2010-02-03 10:43
Your anger and unilateralism, Farmer, remind me of many in the Party of No. As to alternative energies, there is much to be said of wind and solar - - but fossil is always cheaper... And your comments about Haiti speak volumes. You and Pat Robertson clearly have sold your souls to the devil. Best wishes to you both.
Quote
 
 
+2 #10 Guest 2010-02-03 10:03
Quoting Farmer:
All of you against it don't have an alternative solution to provide...so shut up until you do!! If you want to live in the dark ages move to Haiti..i'm sure you would be happier there!! Go Coal!!!!


Conservation, Tidal, wave, Thorium Fission (do some research), Fusion (just took a big step towards becoming reality - NIF), wind, solar. But for Surry, the answer would be biofuel where you can have your cake and eat it too! Get the taxes for a much cleaner plant and put the idle farm land back in service, Mr. Farmer. Or is it Mr. F. Troll .

So just who is this "Farmer". At least (s)he is well outnumbered here in history land.
Quote
 
 
-3 #9 Guest 2010-02-03 08:25
All of you against it don't have an alternative solution to provide...so shut up until you do!! If you want to live in the dark ages move to Haiti..i'm sure you would be happier there!! Go Coal!!!!
Quote
 
 
+3 #8 Guest 2010-02-02 15:31
Ace hardware sells dust masks and goggles,you will need them. There is nothing clean about this plant and if it is built, our health will suffer AND it won't even supply power to this area.
Quote
 
 
+2 #7 Guest 2010-02-02 14:08
Quoting Louisa:
:lol: WONDERFUL, Dendron. Coal plants today with precipitators,and other scientific air cleaning apparatus are close to pollution free. Don't believe the tree huggers and global warming lovers. :roll:


Even the applicant admits to 117 pounds of vaporized mercury released directly into the air, each year and every year. Then there are the tons of NOx and SOx gases as well as the tons and tons of concentrated toxins in the form of coal ash.

Between the smoke stacks and the fly ash, this plant will release far more radiation than the antiquated Surry Nuclear Power Plant!

Perhaps Louisa needs to study the issue a little more with her mind instead of her heart.
Quote
 
 
-7 #6 Guest 2010-02-02 13:42
:lol: WONDERFUL, Dendron. Coal plants today with precipitators,a nd other scientific air cleaning apparatus are close to pollution free. Don't believe the tree huggers and global warming lovers. :roll:
Quote
 
 
+5 #5 Guest 2010-02-02 12:50
The cleanest coal plant available is like the cleanest cigarette you can smoke. With the size of this plant and the volume of toxic pollutants and gasses emitted, it would be like everyone smoking 3 packs a day and calling that safe because there are no regulations against doing so.

The money that this will provide Dendron / Surry County is just another addiction like heroin. The more you have, the more you spend, the more you need. Just like the boat JCC and many other counties are now in. Money corrupts.

There are widespread regional consequences (including crop damage due to increased ground level ozone) that we all will pay for through decreased productivity, increased taxes and increased health care costs as well as lower quality of live due to pollution, other environmental damage and heath issues. Yet this decision is left in the hands of those who will profit from the damage to others even against the will of the vast majority of informed citizens. And this is in America, think what is happening in China, India, etc.!
Quote
 
 
+5 #4 Guest 2010-02-02 12:42
I don't think that Farmer is a farmer at all, but rather a real estate developer, banker, or other money-maker who sadly places immediate and selfish gain over long term perspective. No real farmer who makes his living off the land would take such a swipe at those who seek to preserve and protect it.
Quote
 
 
+6 #3 Guest 2010-02-02 10:54
Not a tree hugger, just someone who doesn't want to eat, breathe, and drink coal filth. He Farmer, tell me what crops you grow and your proximity to the plant so I'll know what not to eat.
Quote
 

Add comment

WYDaily invites you to join the community conversation. We expect civil discourse here. Personal attacks on others, indecent language and bad manners in general are unwelcome.


Security code
Refresh

Talk of the Town

Talk of the Town