LeftColumnBK

Fuentes Created Newest Proposal for Redistricting Maps

The next redistricting map for Williamsburg-James City County elementary schools will be based on a math model created by school board member Joe Fuentes.

At a redistricting work session Thursday night, the board reviewed three options Fuentes drafted to meet its three criteria: proximity, capacity and socioeconomic diversity. Using the most recent map, the result of a Feb. 9 work session, Fuentes attempted to address the remaining problems: too many students at Rawls Byrd Elementary, too few students at J. Blaine Blayton Elementary and a free and reduced lunch percentage that was too high at Rawls Byrd. All three options are available to download here.

To create the options, Fuentes focused on neighborhoods primarily along News Road and the Longhill area. In each scenario, he included how many students in those neighborhoods would be affected, along with how the criteria would change and what problems would still remain. The numbers used reflect the current enrollment, but do not include projections of students in potential growth areas.

The board agreed to work with Option 1a, which Fuentes called the “minimal movement” option. In that option, 163 students from Williamsburg West, Nottinghamshire, Powhatan Secondary II, Jesters Lane, Thompson Lane, Graylin Woods, Hickory Sign Post, Fieldcrest, Deer Run, Hunters Creek and Adams Hunt would change schools.

The first option, as proposed by Fuentes, would still exceed desired capacity at Matoaka, bringing the capacity to 92.50 percent. The free and reduced lunch population at Rawls Byrd would be 36.78 percent, which is also higher than the board had originally wanted. In the meeting, however, several board members said it would be impossible to find a perfect plan.

The map based on the first option will be available online to the public on Tuesday, according to Assistant Superintendent of Operations Bob Becker.

In discussion, some of the board members also expressed interest in Option 3, which would have closely followed the Feb. 9 map, except keep Greensprings Plantation at Matoaka and move Graylin Woods to Clara Byrd Baker. In that plan, 229 students from Rolling Meadows, The Mews, Thompson Lane, Springhill, Lafayette Square, Lafayette Woods, Greensprings Plantation and Graylin Woods would have changed schools.

If the board had gone with option 3, Rawls Byrd, Clara Byrd Baker and Matoaka would all be over capacity, while J. Blaine Blayton and DJ Montague would be under capacity. The free and reduced lunch population at Rawls Byrd would also still be higher than the board had wanted, at 37.10 percent.

Option 2, which was dismissed, would have affected 464 students from Williamsburg West, Nottinghamshire, Rolling Meadows, The Mews, Ford Colony, Graylin Woods, Hickory Sign Post, Fieldcrest, Deer Run, Lafayette Square, Lafayette Woods, Greensprings Plantation, Thompson Lane, Springhill, Powhatan Secondary 1, Powhatan Secondary 2, Jesters Lane and New Town.

The second option would have kept Powhatan Secondary together, attending DJ Montague. The first option splits the neighborhood between Matoaka and DJ Montague.

The board will vote on the redistricting plans at 7 p.m. on April 13 at the Stryker Building in Williamsburg.

To read more about the Thursday meeting, click here.

Comments  

 
0 #26 Guest 2010-03-30 12:06
Quoting Update:
Beware All - The school board indicated that there would not be enough time for a public forum, but at this time, back door meetings with PS are happening. The school board needs to have a public forum with comments from all neighborhoods or nothing at all.


Be careful. Your allegation is unsubstantiated . There is a meeting for Powhatan Secondary residents scheduled for Thursday night. It is not a meeting with school board members. Just as other communities have had their own meetings, PS residents are entitled to theirs.

The school board should have thought about the amount of time they had left for public comment prior to making these last minute decisions. The PS community and the other communities adversely affected by these last minute changes deserve to be heard. There's a lot on the line here, and if the school board truly cares about getting it right, they need to make the time to listen to their constituents.

The Board needs to be fair and consistent.
Quote
 
 
+6 #25 Guest 2010-03-30 08:31
Beware All - The school board indicated that there would not be enough time for a public forum, but at this time, back door meetings with PS are happening. The school board needs to have a public forum with comments from all neighborhoods or nothing at all.
Quote
 
 
-6 #24 Guest 2010-03-30 07:24
Quoting Old Math:
"Makes Sense" doesn't make sense. Option 3 impacts a much greater number of students than 1. Option 1 leaves a greater number of students in their present school.


Your math is definitely "old", as the numbers show an impact on fewer students with Option 3. Go back and check your numbers!
Quote
 
 
+5 #23 Guest 2010-03-29 19:57
JCC Citizen and anyone else who believes WYDaily withheld Mr. Fuentes' maps: Mr. Fuentes gave WYDaily and other media outlets copies of his options at the joint work session on March 16. At the time, it was not indicated the numbers would be used as anything but ideas for how to tweak the existing map and it was not clear the board would be choosing from the options. WYDaily decided to wait to report on his ideas until the purpose of the numbers was more clear. It is our policy to report on what we know to be true, not what might happen.
Quote
 
 
+7 #22 Guest 2010-03-29 19:43
I think all this bashing of J.F. is uncalled for. After edulog failed to come up with any reasonable maps and the citizens complained incessantly, he took the situation and tried to meet the criteria without looking to give anyone any special preference. Then after presenting that info to all the school board members and city council it was given to the media to make public. They chose to not print it. In fact, if no one knew about it, why was there so much public outcry from Springhill and Powhatan Secondary against it? Have you forgotten that NO ONE liked any of the edulog maps, the public forums & board meetings were packed. Also, splitting one MEGA-neighborho od will set a precedent for splitting another MEGA-neighborho od, not automatically allowing any street to be split, assuming that is just childish thinking not common sense. There is a huge difference in a neighborhood with say 200 or even 150 kids as opposed to one with say less than 50. The straw poll taken last week is telling that the majority of the board members have the concern of all the kids, and keeping their criteria is important to the board members, but I'm sure if the people in PS squeak enough they will get their way. They are now sending nasty e-mails to personal accounts to try to stop people from speaking their minds. I think they should have their own school because, surely no one else in the county is good enough to attend school with their darling little ones, and anyway, the way they are acting who would want to? Why can't we all just grow up and realize this is elementary school people. The way we behave will have a direct impact on our kids, be aware, they are watching us and how we handle ourselves so let's try and behave like humans and let the board due their job! And to the board members, if you read this, please know that you may have a couple hundred unhappy families right now, but you have thousands of other, very happy families that are standing behind you and supporting you during this tough time.
Quote
 
 
+1 #21 Guest 2010-03-29 17:19
FYI - Ford's Colony has been split in 2 of JF's options. Williamsburg West and Nottinghamshire are sections of Ford's Colony
Quote
 
 
+6 #20 Guest 2010-03-29 16:32
Many ideas and suggestion have been given to the school board but they dismiss and keep going down the wrong path. Matoaka will be at 92% capacity if PS1, Springhill, GSP and GSW, Governs and Rt5 to Drummond Fields remain. Two of these neighborhoods haven't even come close to buildout and has the most oppoutunity to expand and if this happens, Matoaka will be over capacity and in trailers in 3 years. Neighborhoods can stay together if the board would split accordingly. GPW, GSP, Governs Land and Rt5 to Drummond Fields to Matoaka, PS and all neighborhoods associated and Springhill to DJ, and Westmoreland, Windsor Forest and Fords Colony to Blayton. This will not only help F/R throughout but will help with capacity levels all around.
Quote
 
 
0 #19 Guest 2010-03-29 15:46
Take three things into consideration folks while you either praise and admonish the board as a whole, or individually.

1. If the current plan as proposed with Powhatan Secondary being split is approved, the board WILL BE SETTING A PRECEDENT that ANY AND ALL neighborhoods can be subjected to being split in future redistricting. FORDS COLONY, WESTMORELAND, WINDSOR FOREST, WILLIAMSBURG WEST, et al can now be subjected to being divided and NO NEIGHBORHOOD WILL BE IMMUNE FROM FUTURE SPLITS and NO ONE will be able to complain about it if the board approves the plan created by and proposed by an elected board member that was the one responsible for pushing that a consultant be hired for same. The precedent will be set. Think about the future as well as today.


2. If the board ultimately approves a plan created by a board member, and not the consulants that were hired to make the plan and the map, then the board has WASTED a substantial amount of taxpayer dollars.

3. If the board members who vote for such a plan are probably hoping that when their respective terms comes up for re-election that their constituents will have forgotten about the waste of taxpayer dollars and the precedent they have set by beginning to split neighborhoods.
Quote
 
 
+3 #18 Guest 2010-03-29 13:24
For those of you who either "can't believe they're going to get this wrong again!" or want a new School Board. Look in the mirror for both the problem and solution.

I may not agree with Fuentes' politics or conclusions but I give him an C+ for trying. Redistricting is a political "no win" situation. I think most of the Public realizes this and just likes watching the so called stuffed shirts twist in the breeze.

The fact remains that the new schools cost at least two positions in the Division (they know who they are). Are you gluttonous plebs not satisfied with your pound of flesh?

I’d like to point out that this topic appears to be the one with the most energy on this site, but there is no consensus on a solution just consensus on the identity of the problem.

Either the Electorate chose wisely when it elected the School Board or it erred. There again the cause and solution stares back at you in the mirror.
Quote
 
 
0 #17 Guest 2010-03-29 12:18
Fuentes was out of line to create his own redistricting maps which, incidentally, moves his neighborhood into the new elementary school. The way I read it, he sent his self-constructe d maps directly to the media, without benefit or notice to the paid consultant, the professional administration or the other elected board members. Is this good boardsmanship? Does it provide confidence in the process? Why didn't the board respond by asking Mr. Fuentes to explain his actions? The Board should put more pressure on the administration and the consultant to provide professional direction rather than allow one member to go renegade. Until the professionals are allowed to run the numbers and advise the board, it will appear that the process has been shanghaied and the community will always resent the lack of professionalism , and as a result, many will be suspicious of the outcome.
Quote
 

Add comment

WYDaily invites you to join the community conversation. We expect civil discourse here. Personal attacks on others, indecent language and bad manners in general are unwelcome.


Security code
Refresh

Talk of the Town

Talk of the Town