LeftColumnBK

Demand, Cost Local Although Coal Plant Wouldn't Be

dendron-overview
A bird's-eye view of where the Cypress Creek Power Station would be located in Dendron.
A local forum about the proposed coal-fired plant in Surry County drew around 80 to the Williamsburg Regional Library Theatre Tuesday morning. Although the plant would be situated across the James River, electricity demands well beyond Surry are fueling it and the region would shoulder environmental and health effects that come as part of the price of those demands.

The forum offered two distinct points of view: a supportive take on the plant from David Hudgins, who’s been the public face of the plant the Old Dominion Electric Cooperative wants to build across the James River in Dendron for about three years, and a critical warning of health and environmental issues ahead from physician Christine Llewellyn, who founded the Williamsburg Climate Action Network.

Learn more

Both the Williamsburg Climate Action Network and Old Dominion Electric Cooperative have active Web sites that explain their positions.

Williamsburg Climate Action Network

ODEC's Cypress Creek Power Station

The League of Women Voters of the Williamsburg Area sponsored the forum.

Packing their 15-minute presentations and five-minute rebuttals with facts about the plant, its construction, demands on the local water supply, and an abundance of statistics on emissions, both Hudgins and Llewellyn provided a steady defense of their positions.

Electricity demands were going up, said Hudgins, who reminded the audience that ODEC “didn’t just wake up one morning” and decide to pour billions into a new plant. Virginia is the nation’s largest importer of electricity, he said, just behind California. Just 10 years ago electricity consumption was about 50 percent less than it is today, with the arrival of energy-hungry appliances like iPods and flat screen TVs.  Reserves have dropped, Hudgins said, “and we are on the razor’s edge of blackouts.”

Energy efficiency helps reduce consumption, but lifestyle-driven changes that insist on more electricity more than make up for those reductions. Hudgins said the coal alternative was the cheapest, most readily available option to consumers. Renewable energy sources were a combination of speculation that “couldn’t supply you guys with electricity. Because when you want your light switch to work we have to make sure it does.”

Llewellyn’s somber presentation laid out a different snapshot, which projected what she called the long-term health and environmental costs the power supplied would cost. A coal-fired power plant of the size ODEC proposes “would immediately become the sixth largest polluter in Virginia,” she said. Llewellyn pointed to numerous studies by the American Cancer Society and others that showed links between ozone, mercury and fine particle pollution and mortality.

Already, she said, Hampton Roads’ ozone rating is higher than the national standard, which she predicts will hurt economic development. Mercury is another danger; a single gram in a 20-acre lake is enough to trigger an advisory not to eat fish caught there. The Dendron plant would generate nearly 20,000 grams of mercury a year, having a “huge impact on the Chesapeake Bay.”

The answer to the area’s electricity needs is “as cheap as purchasing the surplus already on the grid,” Llewellyn said, disputing Hudgins’ suggestion that blackouts were not far ahead. “The idea that we could get all of our energy from renewable energy sources is not far-fetched.”

ODEC’s plans need to clear a number of hurdles before it can be built, not the least of which is a series of some 45 permits. The most critical permits are the ones that may be issued by the Environmental Protection Agency, the Army Corps of Engineers and the Department of Environmental Quality. A DEQ review would be prompted by 35 citizens requesting one by the water board, Llewellyn said.

Hudgins agreed renewable energy sources needed to be part of the future, as did reduced consumption by the public. But he also pointed to a different source of most of the pollution the region already faces: too many cars on the road.

“Hampton Roads has a vehicle problem. Williamsburg has a vehicle problem,” said Hudgins, adding that the tourist-driven economy relies increasingly on travelers who get here by car. “That’s what causes pollution – four million visits a year.”

Comments  

 
+1 #8 Guest 2010-04-08 07:18
Northrop Grumman and Ariva are currently building a facility next to the NN shipyard to build civilian nuclear reactors. Apparently there must be a market for these things, or they would not be building them. Coal is cheap only because the power plants do not have to shoulder the full costs of externalities. It is the public that has to absorb the expenses of pollution, not ODEC. Nuclear power is not perfect, but externalities are easily controlled. No one ever got asthma or polluted wells, or contaminated fish from the Surry power station.
Quote
 
 
+3 #7 Guest 2010-04-07 17:33
Great article. So glad it was written.

I am a resident/proper ty owner of the Town of Dendron where ODEC most desires to build this coal fired power station - 1500 MW backed right up to our little Town with a Coal Ash/Fly Ash landfill.

I just posted an article on my blog with links to another great piece done by CBF:

Shortened WordPress Blog link:

A Tale of Two Cities and The Broken Promise of Coal

http://wp.me/piTpo-lA

BambisMusings.WordPress.com
Quote
 
 
+3 #6 Guest 2010-04-07 14:39
Let's stand up to these bullies! We do not need a Coal Plant near any Va. water!!!
Quote
 
 
+3 #5 Guest 2010-04-07 14:36
Williamsburg does not need this pollution. With the situation w/ the brewery and this pollution, w'burg might not be a nice place to live.
Citizens, band together and let's support Dr. L's protest!!!
Quote
 
 
+3 #4 Guest 2010-04-07 11:52
:sad: Sorry, no burning more coal here. Too close to the Chesapeake Bay area, which is in danger enough with population growth and other contaminants. Coal consumption creates slurry with high concentrations of Mercury and other heavy metals. Thing is, it is an efficient source of energy, just a poor location, try somewhere with no fish, no bay and no national seashore.
Quote
 
 
+6 #3 Guest 2010-04-07 09:19
Since when is turning off a light switch more important than one's health. There are hundreds of ways a person can save energy without adding a smelly coal plant to the area that, like it or not,depends on the tourist trade. Again, like it or not, it's the tourist trade that keeps our area going.
Quote
 
 
+5 #2 Guest 2010-04-07 08:51
Rick - If you click on the links in the box titled "Learn more" you'll get information both from WCAN and ODEC, including many statistics-rich reports.
Quote
 
 
+5 #1 Guest 2010-04-07 08:43
Links for more information would have been helpful.
I think this sounds like an interesting debate. Unfortunately I couldn't make it. One thing that either should have been mentioned, or if it were mentioned, should have been included in the article: we can all help both sides of the argument (cheaper, more abundant electricity, and less pollution) by consuming less! Shut off your computer if you're going to bed for the night. Use compact fluorescents, choose energy-star appliances, install a programmable thermostat, etc.
Quote
 

Add comment

WYDaily invites you to join the community conversation. We expect civil discourse here. Personal attacks on others, indecent language and bad manners in general are unwelcome.


Security code
Refresh

Talk of the Town

Talk of the Town