LeftColumnBK

Healthcare Reform Federal, But Effects Will Be Local

The federal healthcare reform bill signed recently by President Obama will have some immediate and long-term consequences for the state as well as Triangle residents. This is the first of two stories explaining what the effects of reform may be on Virginia and the Historic Triangle.

Change is coming to the nation's healthcare system, and its arrival will force the state to re-examine how it provides healthcare to the poor and disabled.

What the federal healthcare reform means to Virginia

A recent report by the Commonwealth Institute (available here) details the sorts of changes Virginians will see due to the federal healthcare bill.

Reforms scheduled for 2014 and beyond include:

  • Creation of health insurance exchanges that would make it easier for individuals and small businesses to compare policies and get coverage.
  • Subsidies that would make it more affordable for almost 700,000 Virginians to purchase private health insurance.
  • Subsidies would also be available to help people pay for the cost of health care services.
  • Small businesses that provide insurance to their employees would be able to receive tax credits.
  • Expansion of public insurance through Medicaid for all children and adults with incomes up to 133 percent of the federal poverty level ($29,000 for a family of four) with generous federal funds to cover most of the costs.
Some of the major aspects of the federal bill include an expansion of Medicaid coverage for people with incomes up to 133 percent of the federal poverty level (about $29,000 for a family of four); subsidies to help certain families afford insurance and services; tax credits for small businesses providing insurance; key market reforms and improvements to the Medicaid system. While some changes will take place right away, others will not take effect until 2014 (see breakout for details).

This legislation will force the state to re-think parts of its recently released budget, now awaiting the governor’s approval. In that budget, funding for Medicaid - the health assistance program for the poor and disabled with joint federal and state funds - has been cut, as have provider reimbursement rates.

The federal bill calls for states to maintain their programs at current levels, but the state cuts are poised to affect about 780,000 Virginians enrolled in the Medicaid program as well as the nearly one million residents who are uninsured.

About that state Medicaid program: Virginia spends little on it, ranking 48th out of 50 nationally in per-capita Medicaid spending, and has one of the most restrictive eligibility requirements for both Medicaid and the state’s insurance program for poor families, called Family Access to Medical Insurance Security.

Like other states, the recession has caused Virginia enrollment in these programs to increase as people lose jobs and insurance. Costs have soared even as cuts to the program have become necessary since the state ruled out options to cover increased healthcare costs for its poor.

The state program, however, was saved from earlier cuts during the recession thanks to $1.4 billion in federal stimulus money, which increased the federal portion of Medicaid funds and reduced the state’s portion.

That stimulus cash is due to run out December 31, which will leave the state with much higher demand and no immediate way to pay for it. One ray of hope is some federal legislation being considered that might grant a six-month extension to the stimulus to support Medicaid, which could mitigate state cuts.

According to Michael Cassidy, Executive Director at the Commonwealth Institute for Fiscal Analysis, the state “could dodge a bullet” if it receives the federal extension, but this will only allow the state to limp along until the end of the year.

The new federal healthcare bill means the state will have to remove some proposed Medicaid cuts to areas like waiver reductions, eligibility reductions and long-term care cuts in order to meet “maintenance of effort” requirements. However, the state can save money by cutting away at provider reimbursement rates, Cassidy said.

In response to the state legislature’s budget bill approved last month, the president of the Medical Society of Virginia told the General Assembly doctors will likely have to reduce the number of Medicaid patients they see. In a recent survey by the society, two-thirds of physicians said they would reduce the number of Medicaid patients they see or would stop treating Medicaid patients altogether.

If fewer providers accept Medicaid, this will likely mean more trips to the emergency room for people who can’t get care (meaning taxpayers will ultimately foot the bill) or more trips to cash-strapped free clinics, like Olde Towne Medical Center and Lackey Free Clinic in the Triangle.

Tomorrow: Even with the extension of federal stimulus dollars, the state will have to grapple with an enormous funding gap in 2012 and 2013 while maintaining its Medicaid program. Rene Cabral Daniels of the Williamsburg Community Health Foundation talks about the reforms' effects on healthcare in the Triangle.

Comments  

 
0 #15 Guest 2010-06-06 15:46
Medicaid in VA, requires that those receiving it, stay put. I was on it, when I went out of state, to see my new granddaughter and assist in her and her mother's care. So what happened? My medicaid was cut off, with $400 removed from my already very low social security check, while I was there. There was no warning given by mail that that could happen! I was devastated!
I couldn't afford to return to VA, so I am stranded, and appealed that decision, but I was told that it had been VA's decision, which meant I had to come back to appeal it? Really????

That made it necessary for me to apply for medical aid in the state where I am visiting, and where I haven't contributed to that program while I was working. Evidently federal programs have long been allocated to states' jurisdiction. Obviously that is a problem.
Quote
 
 
0 #14 Guest 2010-06-06 15:29
Quoting will:
This healthcare reform will bankrupt our state. The feds will reduce the deficit by passing on the expense to the states. What happens when there is no more money?


Typical GOP propaganda!
Quote
 
 
-1 #13 Guest 2010-04-08 23:54
Oh this is too good....ghost of dyp...you actually are staking a claim on a typo by me as being more important than the fact that Walgreens IS IN FACT not accepting prescriptions from new patients, COME ON WAKE up, a typo is one thing but the overall truth in my comment certainly stands. Post accuracy society? WOA I needed a laugh, I hadn't heard that one in. Go ahead and ignore the truth in the financial side of my comment and focus on the fact that I misstated Medicare.....ha ve a good time with it ....
Quote
 
 
-5 #12 Guest 2010-04-08 17:47
This healthcare reform will bankrupt our state. The feds will reduce the deficit by passing on the expense to the states. What happens when there is no more money?
Quote
 
 
0 #11 Guest 2010-04-08 16:42
blqkaren is incorrect -- Walgreens in Washington is declining to accept new Medicaid prescriptions. Medicare prescriptions are not affected. Existing Medicaid patients are not affected.

But that's what I love about 'merica. Facts don't matter in this post-accuracy society.
Quote
 
 
0 #10 Guest 2010-04-08 15:26
Sorry for the wrong name on the post from DOROTY....the pc I was using had that name on it and I neglected to change it.....
Quote
 
 
-4 #9 Guest 2010-04-08 14:29
There really are stupid people everywhere. Hey folks, don't be so naive. All you really need to do is to talk to any recent immigrants, (legal), from russia, croatia, etc., and they will all tell you that we have started the progression toward socialist programs. Say what you want but they do seem to know because they have lived under these programs and if you think you are paying a lot in taxes now, watch out.
Quote
 
 
-2 #8 Guest 2010-04-08 14:09
There are clearly CLEARLY those among us that would prefer socialism to what made us an amazing country. Try reading the following book sometime and see if you still think that what has just passed as law is of our quality and stature. http://www.amazon.com/5000-Year-Leap-Miracle-Changed/dp/0880801484
Quote
 
 
+1 #7 Guest 2010-04-08 14:03
Talk about getting off topic. The issue is that we just handed off the the federal government a wholesale change to our health care system, which by most accounts greater than 20% of our countries GDP. My point is AGAIN that instead of a rewrite to TARGET the broken pieces. Trial lawyers, insurance abuse etc., but NOT to just allow the federal government to re do (ie medicaid), for EVERYONE. As an employer let me say that right now every employee pays at total of more than 13% of their wages, (through FICA and medicaid deductions and their employers MATCHING %), and both programs are in the tank. I am of the opinion that THESE programs are a great test for what does not work. Fix them, and then roll it out to everyone. There has been neglect here for more than just GWB, sheesh give me a break this is not a party issue unless you want to make it one. From FDR forward no one has attended to this. Fix what we know is broken and then see how to roll out BASIC coverage to everyone.
Quote
 
 
-4 #6 Guest 2010-04-08 13:26
Blqkaren, you just don't get it. The system needed a complete overhaul. You don't continue to tweak the system so that those over 65 can get wonderful healthcare and enjoy the last 20 years of their lives. How about those who are 8 and 18 and 28 and etc. who have their whole lives ahead of them? Should they continue to wait until the insurance companies decide to throw them a bone? As for doctors and pharmacies. Guess what? They will continue to see and service patients. They will moan and groan, but at the end of the day they will do the right thing. Don't cut them short.
Quote
 

Add comment

WYDaily invites you to join the community conversation. We expect civil discourse here. Personal attacks on others, indecent language and bad manners in general are unwelcome.


Security code
Refresh

Talk of the Town

Talk of the Town