LeftColumnBK

Last Call for WJC Redistricting, Mathews

An overflow crowd came to the Stryker Building on Tuesday to share opinions about the Williamsburg-James City County school board’s redistricting plans.

In an extended citizens’ comment period, 13 people spoke before the board, many asking the members to consider keeping neighborhoods together and avoid moving students who were shifted in the last redistricting. Two of the speakers presented petitions to the board, one from Powhatan Secondary neighbors asking the board to return to its last redistricting map and one from Ford’s Colony neighbors asking the board to carry forward with its current map.

In addition, Gary Mathews also announced his intention to miss several weeks in the remaining semester of his tenure as superintendent of WJCC schools. Mathews said his wife will soon undergo a serious surgery in Louisiana that will leave her in recovery for weeks; he is also gearing up for a move to the suburbs of Atlanta, where he’ll become the next superintendent of Newton County, Ga. Schools.

Mathews’ contract will not be renewed after June 30. The school board has enlisted the help of the Virginia School Board Association for its superintendent search. In the meantime, Scott Burckbuchler will act as superintendent; Burckbuchler currently serves as assistant superintendent of finance and director of human resources for the division.

Redistricting Discussion
Parents criticized the board’s decision to draft a map based on an option proposed by member Joe Fuentes at a March 25 work session. At the session, the board reviewed three options previously unseen by the public, which were based on the numbers used by vendor EDULOG for its maps. The options used a map drafted at a Feb. 9 work session as a baseline; the board chose option 1 because it moved 163 additional students, fewer than the other options proposed. Read more about the newest version here.

Most speakers told the board to either slow down or hurry up with the redistricting process. The majority of parents wanting the board to return to its Feb. 9 map were from Powhatan Secondary, a neighborhood that would be split between Matoaka Elementary and DJ Montague Elementary. The portion of Powhatan Secondary that would attend DJ Montague is located behind Target on News Road.

In previous meetings, the board has said it would try not to split neighborhoods that weren’t divided by major thoroughfares. Aaron Small, president of the Powhatan Secondary Homeowners Association, told the board he doesn’t consider News Road a “major thoroughfare.”

“The neighborhood does not split along a major thoroughfare, but a two-lane country road,” Small said, adding that busier roads exist in neighborhoods that won’t be split, such as Windsor Forest.

Powhatan Secondary resident Marjy Friedrichs asked the board to reevaluate its capacity projections. She said the state plan to expand pre-K offerings would receive less funding in Gov. Bob McDonnell’s budget (not yet adopted) than in the proposed budget from previous governor Tim Kaine. Clara Byrd Baker Elementary, Rawls Byrd Elementary and J. Blaine Blayton Elementary are slated to have extra room for pre-K students, but Friedrichs said the extra room might not be necessary. If the room can be used to accommodate more elementary students, she said, the capacity would be lower at each school than currently stated.

Later in the meeting, board members asked Renee Dino, supervisor of the division’s early childhood program, why empty pre-K rooms were being included in projections. “In our long-range strategic plan, we built in some room for growth,” she said. “I think maybe what people are referring to are those classrooms we tagged for potential growth over the next two to three years.”

Dino said Clara Byrd Baker will have two classrooms designated for future growth, while Rawls Byrd will have one. All other pre-K classrooms, including eight at J. Blaine Blayton, will be used. The pre-K will be staffed with existing employees. Dino also said it’s hard to project pre-K enrollments since those students aren’t already in the system and some are served in community-based programs, rather than in-school classrooms.

School board member Ruth Larson asked Bob Becker, assistant superintendent of operations, to find out how the available rooms could be utilized and what impact that would have on capacity numbers, as suggested by Friedrichs. The board members indicated, however, they were not going to make changes to the district’s strategic plan for pre-K.

On the other side of the redistricting debate, several parents asked the board to continue forward with its newest plan. Suzanne Spirito, a Ford’s Colony resident, said she was frustrated the board delayed its vote. “I have seen first-hand that the process is not simple, but with each change came progress,” she said. “Please continue to focus on all the children and what’s best for the schools.”

Suzy Yeats, also a Ford’s Colony resident, proposed her own plan to avoid splitting neighborhoods. She acknowledged how tricky it is to move the “mega-neighborhoods” — Ford’s Colony, Greensprings Plantation and Powhatan Secondary — without putting schools over or under capacity. She suggested the school board place one mega-neighborhood in each school: Ford’s Colony at J. Blaine Blayton Elementary; Powhatan Secondary at DJ Montague Elementary and Greensprings Plantation at Matoaka. She said she based her idea on the capacity at each school.

Following the comment period, the board members shared their feelings about the redistricting process. Denise Koch and Jim Kelly spoke out strongly against the most recent map and what Koch called an “11th hour” move to split Powhatan Secondary. Elise Emanuel reminded the audience that WJCC was lucky to be opening new schools in a time when other districts are closing schools.

“Children are sometimes much more resilient than grown-ups,” she said. “Perhaps in this situation, why don’t we follow the children’s lead?”

Board Chair Jim Nickols said the location of the new schools and the unique geography of the county made redistricting especially difficult. “There will come a time when it will not be possible to avoid splitting neighborhoods,” he said.

The board will make its final decision at a special meeting on April 20. The meeting will begin at 7 p.m. in the boardroom of Building F in the County Government Complex.

Comments  

 
-4 #40 Guest 2010-04-18 19:46
The FR goal was 17-33%, discounting James River with the IB program. In all four options, Byrd is high, but the others are in range.

More capacity at Blayton suggests that even more people should move from their current school. Is this what you're arguing for? Because it seems to me that just about everybody is arguing that they should stay at Matoaka and that the less kids to move, the better.

Unfortunately, none of the school board members will be suggesting any more changes, because when you suggest moving even one neighborhood, suddenly you're accused of "hijacking the process" and "throwing out $50K worth of work". I suspect that the board members have learned the lesson that you should never come prepared to a board meeting.

Quoting Whoops:
Numbers,
You've clearly demonstrated the board threw the F/R percentages out the window. With all the shifting in option 1A, proximity is gone too.

Now for the kicker, check out the capacities. It has come to light that the capacity at Blayton was off by 50 students. Believe it or not, Blayton actually has 50 more seats than they originally thought.

So under option 1A, Blayton will be at 76%. Do you think you can spin that to make it look acceptable?
Quote
 
 
+6 #39 Guest 2010-04-18 14:41
Numbers,
You've clearly demonstrated the board threw the F/R percentages out the window. With all the shifting in option 1A, proximity is gone too.

Now for the kicker, check out the capacities. It has come to light that the capacity at Blayton was off by 50 students. Believe it or not, Blayton actually has 50 more seats than they originally thought.

So under option 1A, Blayton will be at 76%. Do you think you can spin that to make it look acceptable?
Quote
 
 
0 #38 Guest 2010-04-18 09:56
F/R numbers are similar among the four options, with each school's numbers varying by less than 2%. Stonehouse, Norge and JR are not touched in the four options and their numbers are as follows:

School: F-R / capacity
SH: 20.6% / 83.3%
Norge: 29.5% / 84.5%
JR: 54.7% / 80.7%

The other six schools have F/R numbers that vary as follows:

School: map 2/9, 1A, 2A, 3
Blayton: 25.8%, 26.5%, 25.4%, 25.8%
Montague: 30.7%, 30.5%, 31.3%, 32.2%
Matoaka: 17.8%, 17.9%, 17.5%, 17.4%
CBB: 18.9%, 20.3%, 20.2%, 18.7%
Whaley: 34.6%, 34.6%, 33.6%, 34.6%
Byrd: 36.6%, 36.8%, 36.8%, 37.1%

What makes/breaks the maps, however, is the capacity issues, targeted at 85-88%.

School: map 2/9, 1A, 2A, 3
Blayton: 81.4%, 83.9%, 83.7%, 81.4%
Montague: 88.5%, 85.1%, 86.1%, 82.7%
Matoaka: 88.6%, 92.5%, 90.3%, 93.0%
CBB: 90.6%, 90.8%, 90.7%, 91.6%
Whaley: 89.0%, 89.0%, 91.0%, 89.0%
Byrd: 95.0%, 90.8%, 90.8%, 93.8%

Also, each map moves a certain number of students from their current school:
map 2/9, 1A, 2A, 3
981, 881, 1174, 947

Option 1A moves the least number of students, while addressing the capacity issues at Blayton and Byrd.

As a further clarification of each map:
The 2/9 map had Powhatan Secondary at Matoaka and puts Greensprings Plantation, Springhill, and Thompson Lane area into DJM. It has over capacity issues at Byrd and under capacity issues at Blayton.

1A puts the portion of Powhatan Secondary behind Target and Thompson Lane area into DJM and puts Springhill and Greensprings Plantation back into Matoaka.

Map 2A keeps both sides of Powhatan together and puts them along with Springhill into DJM. Greensprings Plantation, Fords Colony North/South and Thompson Lane would attend Matoaka.

Map 3 leaves Powhatan Secondary and Greensprings Plantation at Matoaka and moves Springhill and Thompson Lane into DJM. It does not meet capacity criteria at 5 schools.
Quote
 
 
+5 #37 Guest 2010-04-17 21:03
It has been reported that the board will need to split neighborhoods in the future. If that is true; why not do all the splitting now. That way the entire community can be treated equally instead of discriminating against one that maybe is the most diverse. Also that would eliminate the issue of P2 not being represented by their School Board member...oh yeah he just recently realized P2 fell under him when he split P2 and moved his neighborhood to the new school.
Quote
 
 
+2 #36 Guest 2010-04-17 11:47
I find it humorous that I hear suggestions that Powhatan Secondary should choose option 2 to stay together.

Option 2 is obviously a "straw option". You would effectively have buses from Powhatan Secondary and Ford's Colony passing each other on Centerville Rd, as they swap schools, each to one further away.

Option 2 was obviously put out there to say, "Hey Powhatan Secondary we gave you a choice and we didn't take it."

First of all, as is readily apparent, it's not Powhatan Secondaries decision to make. Secondly, if you watch the board meeting, this options was dismissed as by the board as quickly as it was brought up.
Quote
 
 
-3 #35 Guest 2010-04-17 07:27
PS had a chance to stay together and that was in option 2. They were altogether, but at DJ Montague. If they had that option, why didn't they take it?
Quote
 
 
+3 #34 Guest 2010-04-16 22:42
Hey Numbers,
You wrote:
"Fact: Option 1A best meets capacity and FR goals determined and agreed to by the board."

Can you please give us some details on the F/R lunch numbers you mentioned? I've looked over the charts, and I can't see a significant difference in any of them.
Quote
 
 
-5 #33 Guest 2010-04-16 17:57
Option 3 moves 947. Option 1A moves 881. If continuity is important, then why do you want discontinuity for an additional 66 kids? Why do you want Matoaka at 93% instead of 88%, which will lead to spot redistricting and discontinuity in the near future?


Quoting Disappointed 2:
Given the FACT that the pre-K numbers are skewed, Option 3 IS the best option over 1A.

...

At this stage in their educational lives, it's important to have continuity;
Quote
 
 
+7 #32 Guest 2010-04-16 13:20
It's obvious that some people just don't understand it. I don't mean to be disrespectful, so don't take it as such. The old adage, "one can't see the forest through the trees" comes to mind. Mr. Fuentes has thrown out so many numbers that he has SO complicated the process for many people. Don't feel bad "Numbers", because over half the school board can't see through the smoke screen either. Given the FACT that the pre-K numbers are skewed, Option 3 IS the best option over 1A.

It IS important NOT to split neighborhoods. There are numerous studies and articles out there that cite the importance of keeping children together in school and not moving them around again and again.

At this stage in their educational lives, it's important to have continuity; just as all of the board members have said at some point or another. Mr. Fuentes believed in this four years ago!



Quoting Numbers:
Carl: Yes, the kids will attend at least 4 different schools, probably more, as there will be 2 elementary schools, a middle school, a high school, perhaps WCA and Walsingham as well. And when they're in HS, some will travel between schools for different classes.

At the same time, the kids will participate on different out-of-school activities, clubs and teams, and the parents will shop at different grocery stores and attend different places of worship and be members of different country clubs and organizations.

None of this splits PS2 as a community. Y'all can still hang out and socialize, without sidetracking the ability of the school board to more equally and evenly populate the teaching facilities within the district, which map 1A does best.
Quote
 
 
-4 #31 Guest 2010-04-16 10:56
Carl: Yes, the kids will attend at least 4 different schools, probably more, as there will be 2 elementary schools, a middle school, a high school, perhaps WCA and Walsingham as well. And when they're in HS, some will travel between schools for different classes.

At the same time, the kids will participate on different out-of-school activities, clubs and teams, and the parents will shop at different grocery stores and attend different places of worship and be members of different country clubs and organizations.

None of this splits PS2 as a community. Y'all can still hang out and socialize, without sidetracking the ability of the school board to more equally and evenly populate the teaching facilities within the district, which map 1A does best.
Quote
 

Add comment

WYDaily invites you to join the community conversation. We expect civil discourse here. Personal attacks on others, indecent language and bad manners in general are unwelcome.


Security code
Refresh

Talk of the Town

Talk of the Town