LeftColumnBK

JCC Supervisors Consider Tax Break for Chinese Drywall 'Victims'

James City County supervisors have asked staff to look into the possibility of offering residents with corrosive Chinese drywall in their homes a substantial tax break.

Last year, homes across the nation were found to have a type of drywall that releases hydrogen sulfide, which corrodes metal included in wiring, gas pipes, fire sprinkler systems, smoke alarms and other home components. The majority of the drywall seems to have come from a supplier in China, which has been the object of a class action suit recently decided in U.S. District Court. The federal government has been investigating the issue, and though they have not released a statement on the health effects of the drywall, they did recently release a statement recommending homeowners with the substance completely remove and replace all affected drywall and replace all susceptible components.

Cases of Chinese drywall have been reported in 37 James City County homes to date, in neighborhoods that include Stonehouse, Wellington Estates, Braemar Creek, Kensington Woods, Overlook Point and New Town. To date, the county has been contacting builders to rectify the problem if a home is two years old or less; after that, the matter has passed the statute of limitations in the state.

At their regular meeting last week, Chairman Jim Kennedy said some people in his district have contacted him regarding the defective drywall in their homes. Many cannot afford to tackle the extensive renovations needed to repair their homes, Kennedy said, and probably can’t sell the home, either. Some residents have told Kennedy they can’t live in their homes and are facing bankruptcy and foreclosure. A year’s worth of letters from the county to various government representatives at the state and federal level have gotten no response, he pointed out.

“Most people have no means to fix this [drywall problem],” he told fellow supervisors at the meeting, “and it’s their biggest investment.” Kennedy asked the board to consider a proposal similar to what Virginia Beach is offering afflicted homeowners, in which the county would only tax the property and $100 of home value for people with the drywall (though he suggested a time limit on the offer).

“I realize it’s not orthodox, but these people need some relief,” Kennedy said.

Richard Sebastian, director of the county’s Real Estate Assessment division, told supervisors that his office has reduced tax assessments on affected properties to 50 percent of the property’s value. He said there wasn’t any set methodology to address the drywall issue, but his office had used an assessment strategy like what’s used to assess newly constructed homes that aren’t yet inhabited. That way, the size of the structure is accounted for (versus taxing at a flat amount like $100 for every type of home, regardless the size).

Sebastian and Supervisor Bruce Goodson exchanged some heated words about whether this current tax assessment was appropriate, with Goodson arguing homeowners with the drywall should be considered similar to people displaced from fire, who can’t live in their damaged home.

Supervisor John McGlennon said he agreed with the idea of helping homeowners, saying, “in this case someone’s asset has become a liability,” but he stressed the need to look into the legality of the issue and seemed hesitant to create a policy exactly like what Kennedy suggested.

McGlennon suggested that residents should turn to the Board of Equalization if they think their assessment is still too high; the BOE has authority to take unusual circumstances into consideration and adjust tax assessments.

The board will send letters to the 37 homeowners advising them to look to the BOE while a possible county policy on the issue is examined.

County Administrator Sandy Wanner said staff would have to discuss the plan with the county attorney to analyze the legality of the proposal. He said legislators at the federal and state levels are working on the issue, as are builders and banks.

"You’re treading into territory I have serious reservations about,” Wanner told the board, but he agreed to follow their directive and look into Kennedy’s suggestion.

Read more about the Chinese drywall issue on the county’s website here. Find information about the county’s Board of Equalization here. The board will discuss the new ideas on Chinese drywall at a future meeting.

Comments  

 
+1 #13 Guest 2010-04-22 03:55
Our government has seen fit to bail out lots of "guilty" parties. I think it's time to help some of the "innocent" ones.

Neither the homeowners nor the builders is responsible for the chinese drywall issues. I don't have a problem with some of my tax money being used to assist these folks.

I do have a problem with a lot of our government's spending problems... but that's a topic for another time.
Quote
 
 
+2 #12 Guest 2010-04-21 11:00
This drywall episode is, I fear, a lesson that life isn't always fair. The innocent will not always be made whole. Who should pay for this mess -- the homeowners didn't get what they paid for. The homebuilders didn't provide what they promised. Maybe they should pay -- but they, I'm willing to assume, didn't knowingly use a defective product. But then, it didn't take a genius to realize that the Chinese don't always provide acceptable quality products. The Chinese companies should take responsibility, but good luck there. But I've not seen any reason yet for the U.S. government to take responsibility for this mess.
Quote
 
 
+3 #11 Guest 2010-04-21 10:48
When I first began to read the article, my reaction was "NO WAY - JCC shouldn't pay to bail these people out", but that's not the proposal. Property tax should be based on market value, and the market value of a house with Chinese drywall ain't so good. The assessments and the taxes should reflect that.
Quote
 
 
-5 #10 Guest 2010-04-20 18:36
STUPID PEOPLE, this shouldn't be in the county's list of things to do. In the end there is limited money. The issue here is who should pay for what happened. As one who has both a house AND a business with this problem I am speaking from a proper perspective. The reality is that we, the people are not active. This should be an issue for the builders, their insurance, our insurance and the feds. Why? Because in the end the county, (read: YOU AND ME and our taxes), are getting stuck with the bill. Clearly this is why we have insurance and CLEARLY my homeowners and business insurance should deal with this but it won't. My county should NOT BE HANDED THIS ISSUE. The government should seek remediation through the insurance companies that I pay to and the contractors pay to....Oh and btw our culture of low low low has forced china china china for so many products from lead in our toys to this issue so we all have ourselves to blame in some way. HOLD THE INSURANCE carriers responsible.
Quote
 
 
+4 #9 Guest 2010-04-20 12:19
Bravo to the Supes! And not a moment too soon! Where do I volunteer to help?
Quote
 
 
+10 #8 Guest 2010-04-20 08:22
Why is the word 'victim' set out in the headline? Is it a question as to whether these residents are victims? Please look into the legality of the proposal and let's help our residents if we can. I know of a local church that volunteered labor to remove all the Chinese drywall and replace it with better product in one family's home. This has been a devastating loss for this family: months out of their home, adverse affects on their health, uprooting their children to a rental property, paying a mortgage and having to rent a place at the same time while their home is gutted...the list goes one. While the help proposed is a drop in the bucket, any help would be greatly appreciated.
Quote
 
 
+7 #7 Guest 2010-04-20 07:52
Looking to take advantage and retire off the problem? I have heard some idiotic statements in my 50 plus years, this one nearly wins the award! The health issues involved with this defective product are alarming. Many of the people in these homes can't afford to move out of them, they are stuck in a dire situation. Their government, builder and insurance companies deny any and all responsibility. The product in question was once declared safe, if you own a Toyota I bet you love the government required recall on brakes and such. Why should this be different? The government should issue a recall, declare the product unsafe before it's too late. It may be too late already, the company that made the product declared bankruptcy and has re-organized. Some of these people have walked away and ruined their credit, is that fair?
Quote
 
 
+9 #6 Guest 2010-04-20 07:41
Being one of the many JCC home owners affected, this effort is appreciated. But it will take roughly 20 years to recover what we have had to spend so far in attempt to remediate.

It certainly seems that no one is at fault, the builder has said sorry but we don't have the financial resources. Yet they continue to build homes. Our government does not have the resources to protect the citizens from garbage material being imported. Insurance companies have zipped up their pockets for those affected. Not for the lawyers.
Ok what about the manufacturers, the Chinese, yeah right.
Quote
 
 
-12 #5 Guest 2010-04-20 07:35
Good idea.
And keep in mind that after all has been decided in court, if those folks that have been given the credit get any award, all that tax credit comes back to the people of JCC plus 25%!
That's fair, their attorney is probably getting about 33%!
Keep in mind there are some folks with drywall problems that are looking to take advantage and retire off of this unfortunate situation and the largess of the people of JCC need to be amply rewarded.
Quote
 
 
-8 #4 Guest 2010-04-20 07:23
why can't they just remove and replace the drywall? I'm confused. I understand that hydrogen sulfide is corrosive, but how long does it take to cause damage? Would drywall in my den really make it necessary to replace my appliances in my kitchen? There's information missing here.
Quote
 

Add comment

WYDaily invites you to join the community conversation. We expect civil discourse here. Personal attacks on others, indecent language and bad manners in general are unwelcome.


Security code
Refresh

Talk of the Town

Talk of the Town