|
Some Neighbors Object, York Approves Hornsby House B&BBy Matt Poms Wednesday, May 19, 2010 Residents of historic Yorktown engaged in what felt like a civil war Tuesday night during a hearing to add a business to the village.The York County Board of Supervisors sided with a prominent Yorktown family in approving plans for a new bed and breakfast in the historic Hornsby House on Main Street. It will be the village’s sixth such establishment. Fiercely opposed was a vocal segment of Yorktown residents, who argued that allowing the business would change the character of the town and pave the way for increased commercialization. Supervisors voted unanimously to confirm the plan of brothers David and Phil Bowditch to turn their longtime family property into a bed and breakfast that would accommodate guests in five separate rooms. Supervisor Walt Zaremba abstained due to previous business dealings with the Bowditches. “In my mind, preserving history is by using the place,” Supervisor Thomas Shepperd said before the vote. “You don’t preserve it by shrinkwrapping it. You try to preserve as much as you can, but you allow the internal parts to live. We’re not building a Walmart; we’re talking about a bed and breakfast.” The plan had previously earned the endorsement of the county’s Planning Commission by a 4-2 vote. The Virginia Department of Transportation had approved a proposal to allow guests’ cars to bypass the vehicle barriers erected at each end of Main Street during tourist season, and the proposal had the backing of Colonial National Historical Park Superintendent Dan Smith, who lives across the street from the property. The Bowditches also found support in the Yorktown Master Plan, which states that “Bed-and-Breakfasts would also be desirable on Main Street and should be economically viable.” But many residents had different views. Twenty-six individuals spoke at the public hearing, 15 of whom were against the plan. Concerns ranged from the alleged corruption of the town’s historic nature, to the additional parking and traffic flow created by the bed and breakfast. Some cited the Bowditches’ intended use of a live-in manager - instead of residing on-site themselves - as problematic. “We as stewards must protect this village from further commercial encroachment on its history,” neighbor Linda Bennett said. “A bed and breakfast that is owner-occupied remains a residence; it is part of its neighborhood. This proposal would not remain a residence, but a commercial establishment. Approving this application would set a precedent to further degrade the historical nature of York County.” Next-door neighbor Katie O’Hara expressed similar misgivings. “There is no similarity to the other three B&B’s in the western, business half of Yorktown,” O’Hara said. “This is a business operating a commercial inn with a paid, non-family member as the manager. Negative impact on my quality of life and the value of my property would be most likely.” Others supported the plan, citing evidence that it would drive additional business to Yorktown, as well as highlighting historical precedent for businesses in such a spot. Ultimately, the Board downplayed the threat to the town’s historic nature while approving the plan with only one amendment, mandating that a sign advertising the business be placed on adjoining Smith Street, instead of Main Street. “None of us want change, but this is a living, breathing village,” Supervisor Sheila Noll said. “There is going to be change.” |
|
Copyright © 2010-2011 WY Daily. Davis Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Website by Web-tactics
Website by Web-tactics



Comments
I own the B&B with the gazebo you reference and we've had four wedding ceremonies in the last five years. These were only ceremonies...th e receptions were held in restaurants and halls throughout the community.
What I can tell you is the small-minded, mean-spirited nature of one or two of you made the entire experience beyond believable. Based on your comments, you obviously know who I mean and of course you don't sign your name to it...very typical.
These same people (aka neighbors) had no problem with using our property as a dump site for all sorts of junk. Neighborliness is bi-directional.
In fact, I would defy anyone to walk down the middle of DOG street (the main tourist attraction for CW) and identify which homes were historic/open to public tours, which were permanent residences, which were rentals, and which have parking and which do not. Take a look at DOG street from an satellite photo (like on GoogleEarth) and compare to what you wrote down, I am sure that most of the parking would be hidden from DOG street.
Plus, DOG street gets car traffic on Wed and Sunday for Church services at Bruton Parish, and I don't think that's harmed CW one bit, in fact, many people comment about how wonderful it would be to attend services in such a beautiful place. I suspect similar reactions to being able to spend a night in such a beautiful and historic home in Yorktown.
I live in Yorktown and I would have to agree with your last comment. It's high time that these people get out of the private affairs of others. They are in for a rude wake-up call if they don't.
If these Yorktown villagers want solitude and silence, it is they who should move and live elsewhere. Go buy an isolated piece of land in Lanexa or something. Who'd want these people as neighbors anyway!?!
So, my neighbor, it all has to do with your attitude. If you choose to be a grouchy, unfriendly, anti-social curmudgeon, then of course having friendly fun-loving folks come to visit your town is going to be an issue for you. But this is because of how you choose to be, not because of them.