LeftColumnBK

Hotel-Motel Assoc. to Keep Trying for State Support of Visitor Center

Tourism-LogoThe Virginia Tourism Corporation has rejected an application to make the visitor center opened by the local hotel motel association in March an official state visitor center.

In March, the Williamsburg Hotel Motel Association decided to invest $200,000 to turn its office at the Village Shops at Kingsmill into a new visitor center called the Greater Williamsburg Tourist Information Center. The WHMA has applied with the VTC to become an authorized site with the state, which offers benefits like free marketing, training and advice. Colonial Williamsburg is currently the only local visitor center recognized by the state (read a previous story here).

In order to become an official center certain guidelines must be met, including cooperation from a local destination marketing committee, convention and visitors bureau or local government. In a letter dated May 26, the VTC president Alisa Bailey wrote to the WHMA that her organization wouldn’t certify their application.

She cited the need for support from one of the above-listed groups, and said “we asked that you provide us with a letter of support in this regard. I cannot stress enough that the success of a… visitor center is dependent upon the support of the overall tourism community.

“I understand that efforts have been made to include your information at the Certified Visitor Center located at Colonial Williamsburg. I trust that will best serve the traveling public and provide attractive exposure to the businesses of the Williamsburg area.

"Inasmuch as no letter has been received in support of your application by the Williamsburg Chamber of Commerce Tourism Alliance, we must deny your application.”

Priscilla Caldwell, the new director of operations for the WHMA, responded to the rejection by saying, “As there was no time frame required for the application process, we are still pursuing approval and recognition of the Greater Williamsburg Tourist Information Center as a state certified local/regional visitor center.

“We have garnered support from many area businesses, as well as officials and state legislators, several of whom have provided written letters of support to VTC, just this week.”

She says WHMA has received approval from the state’s department of transportation for the location of signs to their visitor center, and VDOT is just waiting for approval from the VTC to order and install the designed signs.

According to a statement from Dick Schreiber, president and CEO of the Alliance, “the Alliance has not taken a position regarding the WHMA tourist information center. We are interested in supporting collaborative, community-based regional projects to enhance tourism, as was the case of our support for initiatives of the Jamestown 400th Host Committee (way-finding signage, prepare-care-share training, regional transportation planning, etc.)”

The Alliance received a letter from Alvin Garrison asking for support for their application. “Our executive committee asked the WHMA, in a letter from chair Jim Golden on April 19, to answer questions it thought important in considering the initiative,” the Alliance statement continues.

“Those questions related to indications of support from the three local governments, members of our legislative delegation, and major attractions. Additionally, we asked for clarification of the WHMA’s views regarding potential confusion by travelers because of signs for the WHMA center and those for the Colonial Williamsburg Visitor Center.  Finally, we asked for clarification regarding WHMA’s plans beyond the first year of operation.

“We have received no response from WHMA and, therefore, have not taken a position on this issue.”

Caldwell says the WHMA will keep working on getting support from the Alliance. “We expect that once we respond to questions and concerns that they have expressed, they will ultimately support this much needed venue to assist travelers and promote area businesses.

“One question the Chamber has asked us is how we will avoid confusion between the Tourist Information Center and the Colonial Williamsburg Visitor Center. We maintain that the new Tourist Information Center will reduce confusion that has existed in the marketplace for decades as the destination has expanded offerings.”

Since opening in March, the WHMA’s Tourist Information Center as helped about a thousand visitors with getting information, directions and reservations.

Comments  

 
+4 #21 Guest 2010-06-14 08:22
Do the Math, that was funny. Its no wonder CW wants less people on the historic streets...their hiding Bin Laden.

But seriously, why do the Chamber/Allianc e, CW, Collaborative, Tommy Norment and the rest oppose everything WHMA says or does? Is WHMA's president that bad a person? Something is defiantly is amiss...smells fishy to me. It is clear that these groups and individuals are biting their noses off despite their own face.
Quote
 
 
-1 #20 Guest 2010-06-12 22:03
Forgive my shorthand reference to "motel" operators instead of "hotel and motel" operators. I did not realize that saying "motel" was so offensive. I am not privy to the membership list, I only know the names I have read in the media.

As for the argument that the WHMA center would be seeing 1000 people a day if it had a highway sign, that's pretty far-fetched. Do you really think people are going to CW (or Busch or Great Wolf Lodge,etc) because they were driving down 64 and saw a road sign? Do you think travelers today are driving up and down the interstate wondering where they can go to get a brochure or buy a ticket? I wish WHMA would get its dang sign just so we could find out.

Finally, if WHMA wants support for its programs it is going to have to get over all the conspiracy theories and delusions of secret councils meeting just to plot ways to hold down the poor, pure-hearted hotel owners. (Maybe Brett doesn't speak for the assn., but it seems like he does most of the time.) If you keep adding people to your enemies list you'll have trouble finding friends when you need them. Now Tommy Norment and VTC have joined the typical list of supposed hotel haters (CW, Alliance, Collaborative and all the members of these groups) - and even now WADMC, which I thought WHMA was a part of. Who's next? Maybe Osama Bin Laden is really living in a restored colonial cave at CW and he's part of the group too.
Quote
 
 
-1 #19 Guest 2010-06-12 09:46
I'm new to the area so I don't know much of the history of the WMHA and the Alliance. I do know that after the sad way the US Chamber of Commerce acted in opposing health care reform that anything connected with the Chamber of Commerce is suspect. Whether you're for the health care reform or not, the Chamber of Commerce acted as a right-wing ideologue. (And I'm not a fan of the reform.) It does appear that the Alliance, which seems to be an arm of the Chamber, may not be acting in good faith.
Quote
 
 
+2 #18 Guest 2010-06-11 22:41
Interested Resident & Question for WHMA - on the surface your question is a valid one. Why did Whma ask for the Alliance's approval and then not answer all of its concerns. I called a friend at the Whma and got a copy of the laundry list of questions and requirements from the Alliance to get their support. Approval from all attractions, approval from all 3 municipalities, approval from our state delegation (ie Sen. Tommy Norment who sits on CW's Board of directors). Why bother answering a list of questions when the Alliance knows for sure that at least 1 attraction and 1 Senator are against it. If WHMA is promoting this Center as a way to increase tourism, why isn't the Alliance Chiefs riding down there to see first hand how it will help tourism. Because they never even considered giving its approval. Just making it impossible for WHMA to meet all of its requirements. Funny that the Hotels in town pay the taxes to fund an organization that is suppose to help them, yet it only makes things more difficult to even get two little blue signs up on the Interstate. Now can you understand their frustration with the status quo?? If you don't believe me, make a call to either organization yourself.
Quote
 
 
+3 #17 Guest 2010-06-11 13:52
Quoting Question for WHMA:
Why did the WHMA submit a letter requesting support from the Alliance, and then not answer the questions the Alliance asked them to clarify? Is there anybody from the WHMA who can provide information about this set of events?


Agreed. Sounds like the ball is in the WHMA's court.
Quote
 
 
+1 #16 Guest 2010-06-11 10:12
Anyone who actually deals with GWCTA on a professional level knows that they work tirelessly to promote and attract visitors to the Williamsburg area. Their primary focus is group business, not just tour and travel, but conference business that has a much further reach than many understand. WHMA on the other hand primarily promotes leisure travel. Which is the focus of many of the smaller, limited service hotels and motels in town. Now, the biggest problem that GWCTA suffers from..too many cheifs (highly paid)and not enough indians. They need more people who are actually looking for business. Stop cutting the marketing budget and start cutting the salaries of the top four people. WHMA's issue..too many smaller properties who are not willing to invest their own funds into promoting and updating their properties and have over-extended themselves financially are calling the shots.
Quote
 
 
+3 #15 Guest 2010-06-11 08:58
I'm unsure why folks are giving negative votes to my question in my previous post. It was simply a question asked in pursuit of a better understanding of the issue. Am I not supposed to ask that question? If so, why?
Quote
 
 
-1 #14 Guest 2010-06-11 08:18
I'm still waiting for someone to give one good reason to oppose the visitor's center. The location argument is bogus. It costs the taxpayers nothing. The confusion argument is ridiculous. It can only help not hurt. It includes all of the tourism components in town. Heck even if they go bankrupt so what. It only cost private business $$ so who cares? The worst thing that could happen is you have to take down a sign! The real answer is power.
Quote
 
 
-1 #13 Guest 2010-06-11 08:12
Do the Math,

How many more visitor's would have visited the visitor center if the signage were in place by Memorial Day weekend? I'll bet they would have seen 1000 per day. It's a small miracle that anyone has stopped by their center due to the lack of signage. How many people would stop in at the CW ticket counter if they didn't have signage all over town? If one of the qualifying organizations would just write the cotton pickin letter this would all be over with. As far as your comment about the chamber I would simply point out that the folks that pulled out of the chamber were right. Tourism continues it's freefall and yet there is no call to action from the Chamber. Regardless of membership the Chamber should be working to help all tourism entities. They darn sure don't have a problem taking the tax money. Furthermore; the VTC is out of line requiring that the WHMA get approval from the Chamber. The VTC knows that the Chamber would never support this effort, and their own rules don't require it. This concerted effort by Tommy Norment, VTC, Historic Collaborative, Chamber,WADMC and so on borders on violating Anti Trust Law and I personally wish someone would make a formal complaint to the Attorney General of the Commonwealth.
Quote
 
 
-2 #12 Guest 2010-06-11 08:10
Do the Math - Well it is obvious that you feed off the trough set aside for the select few. You keep referring to "motel operators" as the complainers. Well, I hate to be the one to correct you, but these are Hotel & Motel owners and management companies that make up this group you are referring to. They represent Hotels like the Holiday Inn - Gateway. Courtyard by Marriott, Residence Inn and Springhill Suites by Marriott, Hampton Inns, Country Inn & Suites, Embassy Suites as well as the small "mom & pop" motels like the "White Lion Motel", etc. So, as you can see this group represents even the national chains in town. Even CW and Kingsmill do not have the exposure and marketing muscle of the national franchises. You would think they would want to work with the WHMA membership to leverage the national franchises exposure, but I guess it is more important to control the tax dollars than try and boost the area's tourism revenue. Talk about Short Sighted Planning. You also bring up a point about the business owners that walked out "in mass" (about 35) in protest to how the chamber is being run by Dick Schrieber. Since I wasnt a member I couldnt join them but I would of and there are many retailers out here that will not join the chamber for the same reasons that those businesses quit. By the way, has Mr. Schrieber done anything to try and bring this important segment of our tourism economy back in to the chamber?? My understanding is NO. By the way, since the hotel industry makes up the bulk of the tax dollars that feed the chamber, how many hoteliers are on its executive committee??? CW doesnt count since they are also one of the main attractions too. You cant have it both ways, either you are a hotelier or an attraction. If you try and represent both in key committees, then you are acting as a monopoly in the area and that is not healthy in a free market society. Sorry to everyone for rambling, but I just want the facts stated as they are and everyone can make up their own minds. PLEASE, this business group(WHMA) only wants signs for the Interstate. How hard is that to understand?? The the chamber will not agree to support it...I wonder why?? So much for COLLABORATION!!
Quote
 

Add comment

WYDaily invites you to join the community conversation. We expect civil discourse here. Personal attacks on others, indecent language and bad manners in general are unwelcome.


Security code
Refresh

Talk of the Town

Talk of the Town