LeftColumnBK

WJCC Board to Vote on Bus Route Changes

Last month, Williamsburg-James City County Schools’ transportation staff was sent back to the drawing board to come up with a bus schedule plan the school board could approve.

Tonight, the WJCC board will vote on the second draft of proposed changes to the division’s three-tier bus route. The first draft was dismissed by several parents, teachers and school board members for pushing the school day for the third bus tier back to nearly 5 p.m.

The bus tiers have to change to accommodate new bus routes drafted after the redistricting of elementary and middle schools. The new routes have to include two new schools — J. Blaine Blayton Elementary and Lois Hornsby Middle — located on Jolly Pond Road.

The new proposal includes five plans that were vetted by a committee including members of the administration, school principals at every level, Student Services, athletics, Operations staff and the Williamsburg James City Education Association. The committee is recommending Option A for approval because it features the least amount of routes and maintains the current bell and tier schedules.

Three of the five options retain the current bell schedule, with the earliest classes beginning at 7:20 a.m. for high schools and the latest classes ending at 3:50 p.m. for six elementary schools. Some of the drawbacks to these options include late buses and an increase of about 19-22 bus routes over the previous year.

The fourth option, deemed Option D, would start the earliest classes 10 minutes earlier, then five minutes earlier for two middle schools and three elementary schools and would not change for the remaining elementary schools. This plan would negatively affect Tier 1 students who don’t ride the bus, and late buses could remain a problem.

The fifth option would reduce the elementary school day by 15 minutes, with the latest class still ending at 3:50 p.m. While the report doesn’t list any pros, the cons list includes a later start at elementary schools, which would affect parents’ schedules, along with a loss of instructional time.

In all the scenarios, the 6 p.m. sports bus will have to be eliminated from schools, but the division will still provide 4:30 and 4:45 p.m. activity buses. Also, the schools would have to adopt a new procedure for releasing students in the morning and loading them in the afternoon.

Students will be released from the bus no later than 10 minutes before class starts. In the afternoon, students should be released to board waiting buses at the dismissal bell; late buses will park at the back of the line.

When evaluating the plans, transportation staff also reviewed the possibility of returning to the previous two-tier bus system, allowing high schools to start later and elementary schools to start earlier. They found that reverting would cost $232,500 to $375,000 for additional bus drivers and $900,000 for additional buses. Starting high school later would also have affected high school athletes who would then have to miss class to travel to away games.

The board will meet at 7 p.m. in the board room in Building F at the County Complex on Mounts Bay Road. See more information about the bus tier proposals here.

Comments  

 
+5 #9 Guest 2010-07-20 12:57
@wjcc parent:

I too am a wjcc parent, and have on occassion taken the kids to school myself. However, I talk to many people who drive their kids to school every day because of some perceived danger or social malady associated with the buses. Dozens of minivans and suvs are queued up every morning to deliver kids and this traffic is far more dangerous than sending the kids to the bus stop. I fully support having buses take the kids to school, and question the logic of those who refuse to utilize them because of ungrounded fears or snobbery.
Quote
 
 
0 #8 Guest 2010-07-20 12:15
kbar - I'm in that parade of minivans because my daughter goes to a tier 3 school. As such the bus does not come to our neighborhood in time for me to get to work on time. Since I will not leave my elementary age child home alone to get on her bus, I take her to the before school program.
Olive and Ernie - who pays for the children's rides if their families can't afford it? Are you suggesting they not be allowed to go to school?
Mom of 2 - I agree about the busses, these schools did not just pop up. They have been in construction for over a year and planned long before that. I know they had to wait until redistricting was done but preliminary plans certainly could have been made for transportation.
Quote
 
 
+3 #7 Guest 2010-07-20 10:21
What irritates me is that they take this long to decide to deal with this issue. Every year they make decisions like this at the last minute. They have known that they would have to add these schools and routes to the system for quite some time and have not made a decision unitl July! The same is true of other things like teacher assignments that are not provided until the last minute. Parents have to work around their children's schedules and it is not fair to leave us in the dark until the last minute.
Quote
 
 
+5 #6 Guest 2010-07-20 09:08
In response to kbar, the school does inquire, prior to the end of the school year, about bus needs for the following school year. Parents are asked to provide information as to whether their children will ride the bus or be driven to school. Are you never late? Do you never have a reason to deviate from your routine? I agree that if buses are provided, we should all take advantage of them and save fuel, however sometimes exceptions have to be made. Olive and Ernie, should we regale our children with stories about how you walked through the driving rain to school for 2 miles, uphill, both ways? We are all responsible for the management of our community and the children who are being educated and transported with your money will be running this country some day, and I for one would like them to know what they are doing.
Quote
 
 
-23 #5 Guest 2010-07-20 07:53
I agree with Olive and am glad she spoke the truth. I worked hard all my life and now the money I earned is being taken away for other people's children. If people want lots of fancy services for their children, they should pay the costs for it directly, not take it from all others in town. Sports and special class services should count for this, too, because not all families need or use them why do they make us all pay for them? Get your hands off of my wallet and pay for your own kids' so-called "needs."
Quote
 
 
+11 #4 Guest 2010-07-20 07:21
Olive, Because when you were in school 3 or more generations were paying taxes for your education. Your parents, grandparents and single and childless neighbors. So now that you and your children have their education are you pulling out ?
Quote
 
 
+12 #3 Guest 2010-07-20 07:13
It irritates me that we have a fleet of buses running these routes and parents instead drive their kids to school and activities. Buses end up running half full, and there is a parade of mini-vans and suvs at the school.
What a waste of fuel everyone's part!
Quote
 
 
-1 #2 Guest 2010-07-20 06:49
If the school system knew that two new schools were being built, why didn't they purchase enough buses to transport the students?
Quote
 
 
-34 #1 Guest 2010-07-20 06:13
Why do we pay for school transportation at all? This should be done fee-for-service by the parents who choose to have kids and then turn around and want others to drive them around. Or parents can drive the kids themselves. Eliminate the buses altogether and save the rest of us our hard-earned money.
Quote
 

Add comment

WYDaily invites you to join the community conversation. We expect civil discourse here. Personal attacks on others, indecent language and bad manners in general are unwelcome.


Security code
Refresh

Talk of the Town

Talk of the Town