|
Can Neighbors Save Lake Powell?Thursday, July 22, 2010 James City County’s Lake Powell will continue to dry up unless the owners agree to let nearby homeowners buy them out. Floyd Powell bought the lake and attached dam in the 1920s and his descendents have owned it ever since. After the dam failed in 1999 and again in 2006, the owners began considering their options in regards to the property. In 2007, nearby land owners offered to tax themselves at a higher rate to allow the county to repair the dam and maintain the lake. The owners agreed to the plan, but then changed their mind. They have recently filed an application with the Army Corps of Engineers to make the now-boggy area a wetlands mitigation bank, which means developers could pay to preserve parts of the Lake Powell wetlands in order to build on other sensitive environmental lands elsewhere.
This would make the owners considerable money, but many property owners in the area aren’t too happy about the idea. Since the 2006 dam breach, the lake has remained partially drained and trees, shrubs and invasive species have been growing along the remaining muddy area (visible from the bridge along Jamestown Road). Several homes that used to boast waterfront property now overlook the overgrown area and homeowners have seen a reduction in the values of their homes by around 17 percent, according to homeowner Sandy Duvall. Duvall is spearheading the Save Lake Powell citizen group, which is petitioning the county to continue with the idea of creating a new tax district to purchase, restore and maintain the lake. She says her property has not only lost value, but now overlooks a mosquito-infested swampland strewn with trash and dead fish carcasses. “People who bought waterfront homes on the lake that’s been here 200 years don’t expect it to ever go away,” she says. But it did. Jamestown District Supervisor John McGlennon has been talking to both nearby homeowners and the current lake owners. He says the lake owners are considering selling the lake to the county, to be paid for through a new tax impact district. Homeowners need to petition the Board of Supervisors to create the special tax district and would need a significant majority of homeowners to support the idea, according to McGlennon. Things have changed since the owners first agreed to sell their stake in the lake property in 2007, however, and the lake owners are looking for more money. “If the wetlands bank is created, there will be substantial financial value [to the area], where there wasn’t tangible value before,” McGlennon says. No price has been settled on yet, nor has the cost of maintenance, so homeowners aren’t sure how much the extra tax amount might be. Duvall hopes the lake owners will consider the tough economy and the reduced property value of nearby homes when they are coming up with a price for the property. The time for homeowners to act is shrinking now that the Army Corps of Engineers has opened up a comment period on the wetlands mitigation bank. They are soliciting comment from the public until Aug. 9, after which time they’ll decide on the application (unless the lake owners decide to sell to the county). “Once it gets classified [as a wetlands mitigation bank], there’s no return for the lake,” Duvall says. So far, her group has collected five or six pages of signatures on a petition to save the lake, and the group has the support of many nearby property owners to begin the special tax district. McGlennon is speaking to both the concerned homeowners and the lake owners to help them reach an amenable agreement. He expects that if supervisors agreed to the special tax district then the county would likely front the money for the purchase of the lake and use the special taxes collected to repay the amount and to pay for the cost of future maintenance, but nothing regarding the issue is certain yet aside from the Army Corps’ Aug. 9 comment deadline. Read the Army Corps plan here. Comments on this project should be made in writing, addressed to the Norfolk District, Corps of Engineers (ATTN: CENAO-REG), 803 Front Street, Norfolk, Virginia 23510-1096, and should be received by the close of business on August 9. Visit the homeowner’s website here. |
|
Copyright © 2010-2011 WY Daily. Davis Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Website by Web-tactics
Website by Web-tactics



Comments
2. If the special taxing district is established, does this mean J.C.C. "owns" the maintenance in perpetuity? In other words if the dam is rebuilt--and then breached a year later--what then? Do taxes in the district go up to cover the cost of dam rebuilding? Or is the county on the hook?
3. What if one or more of the landowners gets behind on their special district assessments?
4. What exactly will landowners in the special district get (or expect) for their money?
If I can't actually use the lake to fish in or paddle my canoe on, why would I care whether it's saved or not? I'm just as happy to drive across a wetland as I am a lake.
Just don't use my tax money to do it.
I feel for the property owners because I know they have lost money. But even so, the Lake is just as beautiful as wetlands.
I have always thought wetland banks to be a complete eco-farce. Wetlands are by no means fungible, and a wetland in one area may or may not be replaceable in another area. This is a shuck and jive scheme thought up by developers and sold to congress as a green idea. It is green alright, in the same way that money is green.
A removal of the dam would most likely get rid of the remaining ponding and result in the restoration of old bottom land. Eventually it would reforest, or cypress could be planted to speed up the process, and create an nice natural buffer.