|
Train Strikes Car at Private Crossing, Killing DriverBy WYDaily Staff Sunday, August 01, 2010
The driver of this car was killed after an Amtrak train struck it at the Hill Pleasant Farm entrance. (Photo courtesy of James City-Bruton Volunteer Fire Department)
A 78-year-old James City County woman died Saturday morning after her car was hit by an Amtrak train.Doris Antczak was alone in her Ford Escort just before noon when the passenger train struck as she was driving across a private crossing to enter Hill Pleasant Farm (also known as Hunt's Farm) in the 6900 block of Richmond Road in Norge. The entrance to the farm is beyond a private railroad crossing, which is marked with a sign alerting motorists and pedestrians to beware of trains. There is not a gate to prevent crossing when a train approaches. James City-Bruton Volunteer Fire Department spokesman Bill Apperson said the train was traveling at 79 mph when it struck, and dragged Antczak's car between a third- and half-mile before coming to a stop. She was killed instantly, but there were no injuries to the train crew or responders, he said. One passenger was taken by medics to a local hospital for treatment of a non-life-threatening medical condition, Apperson said. Emergency crews were on the scene for about four and a half hours, and the James City County Police Department is investigating the accident. Passengers on the eastbound Amtrak train were taken by bus to the next station, he said. |
|
Copyright © 2010-2011 WY Daily. Davis Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Website by Web-tactics
Website by Web-tactics




Comments
Mary - are you heartbroken that the children fear their father is no longer able to safely drive given his age & recent safety record and are insisting on his taking a test that you disagree about, or that they are not supportive of your encouraging him to take the drivers test that his doctor recommends he take? And at what point is it negligence on the part of your husband to continue driving after a doctor has advised a drivers test to assess his continued ability to do so? I hope your husband's next accident is not a fatal one, for your husband or the others involved -- and that it isn't MY loved ones he hits, minor or not! At this point I have not heard the cause of this honorific train accident -- perhaps driving ability had nothing to do with it! But when ability to drive is an issue, shouldn't there be a mandate to test for continued proficiency?
I have operated a business next to a railroad track and even raised my four children on property next to a railroad track and have personal experience with observing the average level of caution used by drivers crossing railroad tracks with this type crossing. I also have experience with a couple car-train collisions practically right outside my back door. I would like to comment that even "back in the day" (referring to the 70's)when crossings like these were more plentiful, I could never conceive that they were safe crossings for every driver. The crossing is marked, sure, and the train is loud and can be seen if you look in its direction. But there are all sorts and ages of people who have no experience at all with this sort of crossing, and they are especially vulnerable. I think we should protect them from losing their life simply because they are inexperienced.
On what do you base this broad sweeping statement?
May God be with this family and their friends