LeftColumnBK

Subdivision Plan Near CW Gets Planning Nod

A preliminary plan for a new subdivision bordering Queens Creek was approved by the Williamsburg Planning Commission on Aug. 18.


The Mahone Family Partnership will subdivide three lots, totaling 28.16 acres, into 42 single family house lots. The property is located on the west side of Capitol Landing Road at Queens Creek, bordered to the south by Spring Arbor Assisted Living.


AES Consulting Engineers will build a cluster development on the property, which is located in the Architectural Preservation District. By constructing the homes in a cluster, the development will be able to maintain 13 acres of open space, along with an already identified greenbelt corridor facing the creek. The division will be accessed off Capitol Landing Road, with a left-turn lane constructed as part of the planned intersection improvements.


The plan for the subdivision is still in the early stages, but the Mahone Family Partnership has already worked with the Williamsburg Land Conservancy and Colonial Williamsburg Foundation to ensure the stretches of untouched trees along the creek will remain. The developer has also proposed adding a nature trail and a neighborhood dock along Queens Creek.


The largest portion of the site development will occur on an existing cleared field, allowing the wooded area off of Capitol Landing to be preserved. Tom McDaniel, representing the Mahone Family Limited Partnership, has offered a conservation easement of eight acres. The easement will be dedicated to the Williamsburg Land Conservancy when the subdivision’s final plan is recorded, McDaniel said in a letter to the commission. The easement will restrict the clearing of mature trees and vegetation.


During the meeting, representatives from the Colonial Williamsburg Foundation and Williamsburg Land Conservancy voiced their support for the plan. CW Director of Property Planning Victoria Gussman told the commission that the unspoiled views of Queens Creek as travelers enter the city on Rt. 132 are crucial for helping visitors feel “they are crossing into another time.” CW owns the property that faces the Mahone land on the other side of the creek.


Bill Williams, chairman of the Land Conservancy, echoed Gussman’s comments, saying the easement plan will protect the scenic integrity and value of the Rt. 132 community corridor. He noted the Land Conservancy may or may not be the ultimate holder of the easement, because the transfer would have to be approved by its board of directors.


Because the land is located in an Archaeological Preservation District, the developer commissioned archaeological investigations. Ten archaeological sites have been identified on the property, which is possibly lined with components of the Middle Plantation Palisade, a barrier built around the modern-day Williamsburg area in 1634. An Archaeological Management Plan asks that the Palisade remnants remain undisturbed as much as possible during construction.


Three homes currently sit on the lots. The owner requested approval to demolish two of the homes – bungalows built in 1919 and 1920 – but was denied. As such, the owner has the option to put the homes up for sale and if they are not sold within a year, can then demolish the homes.

Comments  

 
+4 #7 Guest 2010-08-26 21:39
Very, very sad! WB has a tremendous inventory of NEW townhomes, condos, houses, etc... that are not sold/rented due to overdevelopment & folks not moving here in "droves" due to the economic downturn (that most of us are more than struggling to weather through). Our waterways, flora, fauna & land are PRECIOUS GEMS! "Preserve the scenic integrity... archaelogical remnants..." PER THE ARTICLE. The historical value of the land has no dollar amount. The significance of leaving that area untouched is vital. It is unfathomable that more development has been approved since WB has been inundated with new housing of all types. If I had the money I would purchase the land. What about the continuing loss of our natural habitats? Where will all the animals go? Keep culling the families of deer, right? We are now blessed with the great eagle here. They nest in specific areas that will eventually be sparse if this continues. Not to mention the added stress on our various waterways from pollution. The parking lot behind Trader Joe's is but one example of the devastation to our land. Doesn't it look beautiful? Why not clear-cut every undeveloped parcel? AND - - more land to be clear-cut for Fresh Market when there is an abundancy of unrented retail buildings. Is nearly every bit of our land fair game now? Eventually it will all catch up & this gorgeous place we call Williamsburg will never be the same. Will tourists want to flock here then? Will the almighty dollar & politics continue to win out again & again & again??? It is all a very, very sad & disturbing commentary. Yes - - I am more than passionate regarding our land & the animals & plants that inhabit it & call it home. Obviously development is important for economic growth, however, there comes a time to stop, breathe the fresh air & take an honest inventory of our motives. What do we want to leave for our children & future generations? Think about it please... ... ..
Quote
 
 
-2 #6 Guest 2010-08-24 12:26
If I owned the property, I could do with it what I please (as long as it's within the regulations and zoning of course).
Quote
 
 
-1 #5 Guest 2010-08-24 11:42
These people want to make money off the property. If you do not wnat them to build then buy it from them. I'm sure if you offered them what they project as revenue from teh site then they would probably sell. Let's face it, if they could get the profit without the hassle of developing it htey would certainly take it.
Quote
 
 
+4 #4 Guest 2010-08-24 08:48
How sad that the City of Williamsburg and Colonial Williamsburg Foundation would let more house encroach on our lovely Colonial treasure. It was my understanding that CW would always try to protect and conserve the land that is close to its boundaries. Once you sell and develop this property, there is absolutely nothing you can do about it. Shame on the City!
Quote
 
 
+2 #3 Guest 2010-08-24 08:27
I already have my house. How dare you build more for others!!!
Quote
 
 
+3 #2 Guest 2010-08-24 08:17
Oh, but as long as visitors can see the water when driving in and feel they are "crossing into another time" then it MUST be okay! Let's destroy even more natural habitats to score a few more overpriced homes in this area!
Quote
 
 
+10 #1 Guest 2010-08-24 07:04
Another beautiful area torn up for housing that average people cannot afford.
Quote
 

Add comment

WYDaily invites you to join the community conversation. We expect civil discourse here. Personal attacks on others, indecent language and bad manners in general are unwelcome.


Security code
Refresh

Talk of the Town

Talk of the Town