LeftColumnBK

Enrollment Up At York, WJCC Schools

Preliminary numbers show enrollment has increased at both York County and Williamsburg-James City County schools.

Public school systems conduct several enrollment counts a year, starting with a preliminary count 10 days after the start of the school year. An official enrollment count is conducted Sept. 30.

York County’s enrollment after 10 days was 12,517 — an increase of 49 students over the previous school year’s enrollment. But while the enrollment increased, it fell short of the estimated increase of 12,600.

Williamsburg-James City County’s enrollment at the 10-day count was 10,538, a rise of 30 students over the enrollment in the 2009-2010 school year. WJCC also fell short of its projection, which was an enrollment of 10,720.

At a work session Tuesday night, Acting Superintendent Scott Burckbuchler said much of the discrepancy was due to fewer students entering Kindergarten than expected. Last year, the division projected 791 students would start Kindergarten, but 678 were enrolled as of Tuesday. Burckbuchler said the division uses birth records to make its projections, but it was hard to say why the amount of Kindergartners fell short; he surmised many families were moving in and out of the system due to the downturn in the economy.

Enrollment projections were closer to reality for the other grade levels, but elementary staffing was still a concern, particularly with the addition of J. Blaine Blayton Elementary School this year. Senior Director for Human Resources Jon Andre told the WJCC board on Tuesday that in most cases, class sizes are at or below the target ratio for students to teachers. At Rawls Byrd Elementary, however, a teacher will be added to the first grade, and internal switches have already been made to alleviate large classes in the third grade at Matoaka.

School Board Member Ruth Larson said she’d received many calls from parents who were upset about larger class sizes at the elementary level. “I would urge people to be engaged in the budget process,” she said, explaining that the board increased class sizes last year in order to avoid layoffs.

 

Comments  

 
0 #7 Guest 2010-09-26 06:34
Did anyone notice all the empty classrooms set aside for early childhood education that were to have 8 - 14 students per class, under Kaines bad planning and early childhood education estimates and now we have 4th graders with 28-30 students packed in like sardines.
Quote
 
 
-5 #6 Guest 2010-09-23 12:46
Bob is correct in many ways.You need to look at the final product we are turning out(our kids) and it doesn't look very good. It would have made way more sense to pay for better teaching in quality and work force, then build new schools with out both of those.
Quote
 
 
-4 #5 Guest 2010-09-23 11:42
New Schools R Smart I bet you are one of the ones that went out and bought that new big home you can't pay for. I am talking about a little Fiscal responsibility by our leaders. Managing public money is a matter of public trust, and a charge that should not be taken lightly. But managing resources involves more than “spending or not spending.” It also includes assessing needs, setting priorities, and appropriating funds as well. This is the more difficult part of managing resources. It’s very easy to say “yes” to everything. It’s much harder to research the school systems responsibilitie s and past performance, to assess the needs in various departments, and to decide where the money should go. You can not get there by being off by 14% on your projection. Debate that!
Quote
 
 
+4 #4 Guest 2010-09-23 09:41
In the future, when the expenses would have come due for deferred facilities, Bob R. will have succumded to old age. Why would he care? :oops:

Quoting New Schools R Smart:
The portable classrooms are disgusting flimsy shanties that don't even have bathrooms.

We're better off with the new schools. We need them now and of course even more so in the future. Bob R would have us pay more in the future - how utterly silly.

Bob R is wrong.
Quote
 
 
+6 #3 Guest 2010-09-22 18:52
Bob R is also wrong to connect the budgets for any school building projects to the budget for teacher salaries. They are completely separate and don't affect each other at all.

To quote "New Schools R Smart" - Bob R is wrong. (Quite wrong in fact).
Quote
 
 
+7 #2 Guest 2010-09-22 15:26
The portable classrooms are disgusting flimsy shanties that don't even have bathrooms.

We're better off with the new schools. We need them now and of course even more so in the future. Bob R would have us pay more in the future - how utterly silly.

Bob R is wrong.
Quote
 
 
-7 #1 Guest 2010-09-22 08:20
The projection wwas off by over 14% because the board does not factor in addition data into the analysis. Why not look at building permits and unemployment rates when making your projections? The board should measure projection year over year and change the formula to improve stats. 14% error is much to high. Would we not have been better off not building both new schools, hiring teachers and lowering the class sizes even if it required portable class rooms? I think so. This ecomomy has been in the tank for 4 years.
Quote
 

Add comment

WYDaily invites you to join the community conversation. We expect civil discourse here. Personal attacks on others, indecent language and bad manners in general are unwelcome.


Security code
Refresh

Talk of the Town

Talk of the Town