LeftColumnBK

College Students Push for 'Living Wage' for WM Staff

Rossie Coleman skipped work to be here.

He works three jobs during the week, including one as a housekeeper at the College of William and Mary.

“If the College of William and Mary is my primary employer, why don’t you all do something so that I don’t have to work two or three jobs?” he said. “I get up in the morning and I don’t stop ’till nine or 10 o’clock.”

Coleman was one of three College staffers to participate in “Workers Speak Out,” a Living Wage Coalition event that allowed staff members to express their concerns about their roles within the College community.

Thursday night’s forum was part of an effort to increase the hourly wages of staff on campus. According to LWC, average hourly pay at the College hovers around $10.90.

“This campaign for me means better staffing and better communication,” housekeeper Shelly Givens said at the forum. “Just because it says ‘housekeeper’ on my paperwork does not mean I am slow or illiterate.”

Coleman, Givens and Josie Johnson answered questions from students about how their levels of pay have affected their livelihood, and explained the challenges of being housekeepers at the College.

Although improving hourly wages was cited as their chief concern, Coleman, Givens and Johnson also said that poor communication, under-staffing and a lack of respect for housekeeping staff contributed to a problem with morale on campus.

Johnson, who has been at the College for 10 years, said that under-staffing places an unreasonable burden on housekeepers who remain on the job. In what she referred to as high-maintenance student housing — the units were specifically cited — this prevents staff from performing their jobs efficiently.

“When you’re not properly staffed, you have a hard time getting things properly sanitized every day,” Johnson said. “They filled the vacancies, so now the next step is a living wage.”

Statistics cited by the LWC put a living wage for a single-parent, single-child household in Williamsburg at $2,262, not including the cost of health care.

“I really wish I was getting a living wage so I could live like a normal person,” Johnson said. “I don’t have a degree; I don’t expect $60,000 per year.”

Johnson added that she makes approximately $20,000 annually.

Another concern raised by the forum was the condition of staff break rooms, which Coleman described as deplorable. Last year, housekeepers in Earl Gregg Swem Library said that their break room had been converted into a storage closet.

According to Coleman, staff are forbidden from using student lounges in residence halls during their breaks.

“We’re unable to sit in the lounges that we clean,” he said. “I can clean it, [but] I can’t sit there to catch my breath.”

The event was sponsored in conjunction with several student and local organizations, including the Tidewater Labor Support Committee, which has been present on campus for 11 years.

Approximately 100 students, faculty and staff attended the event, held in Andrews 101. College President Taylor Reveley was present in the audience, but he did not address the assembly.

“I think it’s important the housekeepers get out there and see the students support them,” Reveley said after the forum. “It’s a very hard job, and I can understand at times that it puts strain on the people doing it, but there are no simple answers.”

Last week, LWC organized a rally in the Crim Dell meadow to promote living wages for College staff. The march concluded at Blow Memorial Hall as members of the College’s Board of Visitors exited the building. Reveley took the opportunity to thank TLSC for advocating on behalf College staff, underlining the importance of their roles in the College community.

KB Brower ’11 opened Thursday’s forum by thanking the staff members for their participation. Students were then able to submit questions on index cards to volunteers, who chose questions for Coleman, Givens and Johnson to answer.

History professor and labor expert Cindy Hahamovitch then gave a brief history of the TLSC and its role in previous efforts to improve staff wages at the College.

Although staff wages improved several years ago, Hahamovitch said that wages remain well below what is considered a living wage.

After the event, Brower said that LWC will continue with events in support of the wage increase over the coming weeks.

“We do have long-term plans to keep pushing until this happens,” she said.

Comments  

 
+1 #10 Guest 2010-10-19 07:45
Having worked a lot of different jobs during my life, I have little sympathy for people who think somebody else should pay for them because their life is hard. Try a life with a father who couldn't hold a job and a mother dying of cancer.
Quote
 
 
0 #9 Guest 2010-10-19 07:38
As someone who worked my way through college on weekends and each summer, what got to me was the slipped point that employees in a resident hall are NOT ALLOWED to sit down for a break for a few minutes??
Quote
 
 
-2 #8 Guest 2010-10-18 14:26
It is also your right to organize!
Quote
 
 
-4 #7 Guest 2010-10-18 12:00
Does anyone find it interesting that these workers don't feel they're paid enough? I say, welcome to the club!

Who doesn't feel they're not paid enough. The difference between these workers (and those like them) and others, is that other workers somehow find a way to improve their own conditions (pay, benefits, work environment, management) by improving their education or skills or possibly pursuing another position elsewhere that offers better compensation.

The employee has the ultimate leverage, there is only one of you (that can offer an employer the talents and skills that you possess) and thousands of employers who are willing to pay someone (with the most to offer) a competitive wage to complete the work that needs done.

If you don't like your job for whatever reason, choose to find a better one; so far, it is your right to leave.
Quote
 
 
-1 #6 Guest 2010-10-18 09:31
Maybe the students can help by cleaning up there own spaces, allowing the college to lay a few housekeeping staff off, and take the savings and give increases to the remaining housekeeping staff. Maybe have an incentive program where you only have housekeeping services in your senior year, and only if you have a 3.5 GPA and above, sort of like how UVa decides who gets to live on "The Lawn".

Perhaps the students could consider spending some of their student fun (aka "Sex Worker" show funds) on the housekeeping staff.
Quote
 
 
+4 #5 Guest 2010-10-18 07:49
This is like real world vocational training for the W&M students. Hey - maybe W&M could raise some extra cash by offering this situation as a course called 'Real Life 101'. They could learn about budgets, where the money comes from and how you divvy up resources. As well-intentione d as these students are, these fiscal realities (how much you've got/how much you can pay/who gets it) is clearly a life lesson that's escaped them so far.
Quote
 
 
+9 #4 Guest 2010-10-18 07:45
Minimum wage jobs will always be available for folks with low skills.

I could be working for min wages too but instead of asking my former employer to increase my wages so I didn't have to work 3 jobs, (I would have gotten little sympathy) I went back to school. (I also had a family, worked full time and I drove to Washington, D.C. every weekend.
To get my undergraduate degree This is what I had to do because I could not attend during the weekdays and this was the closest college with a Weekend college)

Everyone who has done something like this will understand about CHOICES.

The College only has a responsibility to pay what the marketplace will tolerate - this includes EVERY employee at W&M.
Quote
 
 
+10 #3 Guest 2010-10-18 07:22
I'm sure that off-campus students would love to pay higher tuition for the "high maintenance student housing" on-campus :-* . The increase will inevitably be split between higher room and board for dormitories etc. and higher tuition for everything else because, essentially, the state has virtually abdicated most of their responsibility for higher ed. Right now the state only pays for 12% of the cost of running the College, and it continues to decline each year. It is just a matter of a very short time before the College will only take the wealthiest students into this supposedly "public" university.
Quote
 
 
+1 #2 Guest 2010-10-18 07:00
How do you feel about the current tuition rates? Perhaps the students would be willing to get jobs to help pay higher tuition rates to fund the higher wages... or perhaps they could ask mom and dad to pay higher rates to help fund the higher wages.
Quote
 
 
+1 #1 Guest 2010-10-18 06:58
This is an easy problem to solve. Simply raise tuition on all the undergraduate students in order to pay for the wage increases they are calling for.

Since they are requesting these increases, I'm sure they will be happy to pay the higher tuition.
Quote
 

Add comment

WYDaily invites you to join the community conversation. We expect civil discourse here. Personal attacks on others, indecent language and bad manners in general are unwelcome.


Security code
Refresh

Talk of the Town

Talk of the Town