LeftColumnBK

What the Constitutional Change Questions on Today's Ballot Say

ALEXANDRIA, Va.- As voters head to the booths today, they won’t just be deciding on who to send to the U.S. House of Representatives – three proposals to amend the Virginia Constitution will also be on the ballot.

The General Assembly would like to increase the cash cap on the “rainy day fund” by 50 percent, as well as offer more leniency in granting property tax exemptions to seniors and disabled veterans.

The “rainy day fund” is an account the budget can rely on in tough economic times, but lawmakers are limited as to how much they can deposit into it when times are good.

“The big benefit of it is the next time we have a recession,” said Sen. George Barker, D- Alexandria.

The fund stood at $1.19 billion in 2007 but has steadily declined to $295 million during the recession. Increasing its cash cap could build the fund back up more rapidly.

Conservatives are getting behind it because “it also stops government from growing,” said Del. David Albo, R- Springfield.

When the General Assembly has excess money, lawmakers tend to put it toward government programs, but when that money runs out, it causes funding problems, Albo said. The rainy day fund is a good way to save money.

Both Democrats and Republicans seem to be supporting the proposal. It passed the House and Senate unanimously.

Albo said, “Both conservatives and liberals like the idea, but for different reasons,” - conservatives for its government-curbing effect, liberals for its cash safety net.

The other two initiatives deal with property tax exemptions for senior citizens and disabled veterans. One measure would allow localities to grant real estate tax exemptions to low-income seniors without having to go through the General Assembly.

Lawmakers hope to give a break to people on fixed incomes.

“They’re getting taxed out of their house,” Albo said.

Right now, localities must go through the General Assembly to pass a program giving tax breaks to low-income or disabled senior citizens.

“This would allow localities to set their own rates,” said Del. Mark Cole, R- Fredericksburg.

It also lets localities determine if they need the program in their area.

“It’s such a different world if you’re in Danville or if you’re in Fairfax,” said Mary Jo Fields of the Virginia Municipal League, a lobbying organization for localities.

The other initiative would help veterans who are completely disabled from their time in the service — or their surviving spouses — by exempting them from taxes on their homes.

Sen. Toddy Puller, D-Mt. Vernon, sponsored the senate bill to amend the constitution. Her late husband Lewis Puller was completely disabled while serving in the Vietnam War. She said many other states provide this exemption to help veterans.

“All of the veterans here … in Virginia that I’ve talked to are in support of it,” said Kim DeShano, the quartermaster at the Virginia Veterans of Foreign Wars. “They know how tough it is, especially if you’re disabled, can’t work, and on a fixed income.”

Over 700,000 veterans live in Virginia, but Puller said the new law would only apply to 7,300 of them.

But the proposal has met resistance from the Virginia Municipal League. Although the league said it was a good cause to help veterans, they always advocate for local authority.

“We felt the state should not be using local taxes to give tax breaks,” Fields said. “There were other ways to grant that.”

All three proposals must garner a simple majority on Nov. 2 in order to amend the constitution.

Comments  

 
-5 #7 Guest 2010-11-02 19:28
Got news for all of you who want to BROADEN THE TAX BASE...its a simple principle. If you give a teenager more money he/she will spend it all...our government is the same way. In fact, it should be your WTH civic duty to open your eyes and see that they need more money to cover what's already been spent not to make further improvements. Live within your means! Respect those who have given their lives to their country! Wake up and smell the roses!

Quoting Flyboy:
WTH, information about this ballot has been available for months and is not difficult to find. It's a very basic civic duty to do the necessary research before going to the polls, who did you expect to do it for you? God help us all if most people vote today based on "campaign BS and robo calls"! :cry:
Quote
 
 
+6 #6 Guest 2010-11-02 12:35
WTH, information about this ballot has been available for months and is not difficult to find. It's a very basic civic duty to do the necessary research before going to the polls, who did you expect to do it for you? God help us all if most people vote today based on "campaign BS and robo calls"! :cry:
Quote
 
 
-3 #5 Guest 2010-11-02 11:31
I am opposed to the idea that my local government can require me to pay the real estate taxes of someone else.
If the Veterns Administration wants to pay these taxes, OK, but not me.
We should be broadening the tax base, not reducing it.
Quote
 
 
-13 #4 Guest 2010-11-02 09:42
To WTH you should read more pay attention to what is on the ballot. I believe you should have to pay taxes to vote in an election. if you dont pay state tax you should not vote in a state election, if you dont pay local taxes you should not be allowed to vote.The government would look a WHOLE lot different than it does now!
Quote
 
 
+9 #3 Guest 2010-11-02 08:35
I agree with Fair Taxes comments and furthermore while the veterans do deserve to be honored this exemption would put an unequal amount of burden on municipalities that have a greater number of veterans while leaving the others without having to forgo any decreased income from taxes.
Quote
 
 
+7 #2 Guest 2010-11-02 08:16
Why didn't we get the information before we got to the polls this morning? We've been bombarded with campaign BS and robo calls, but nothing on the amendments.
Quote
 
 
+13 #1 Guest 2010-11-02 07:07
I'm all for the Federal Gov. to be very generous to veterans with my tax money. Exempting disabled veterans from local taxes would unfairly benefit those that have more. An unemployed homeless disable veteran would get nothing from this. A disabled veteran lucky enough to somehow have a good income and or large property holdings would get quite a bit. Those that need our help the most would get the least from these dollars.

If the State wants to help, decide an amount for each disabled veteran. Put the total amount in programs to help whichever veterans needing it most.
Quote
 

Add comment

WYDaily invites you to join the community conversation. We expect civil discourse here. Personal attacks on others, indecent language and bad manners in general are unwelcome.


Security code
Refresh

Talk of the Town

Talk of the Town