LeftColumnBK

Voters Say Yes To Wittman, No To Stormwater Referendum

 

JCC-stormwater-ref-sign
Signs like this one popped up all over James City County Tuesday morning.
Voters in the Historic Triangle kept poll workers busier than expected on Tuesday.

The voter registrars in Williamsburg, James City County and York County all reported larger-than-anticipated turnouts for a non-presidential election year. The first sign the crowd was bigger than predicted? Williamsburg Registrar Win Sowder ran out of “I voted” stickers long before the polls closed at 7 p.m.

In Williamsburg, about 38 percent of the registered voters cast ballots; about 49 percent of James City County’s total voters cast ballots; and about 45 percent of York County’s voters cast ballots. In each locality, the number of registered voters had increased in the two years since the presidential election. Williamsburg has 9,197 registered voters; James City County has 48,987 and York County has 44,321.

In 2008, the Historic Triangle’s voter turnout was just above the state average of 74.54 percent; 79.9 percent of James City County’s voters cast ballots that year, compared to 77.54 percent of Williamsburg’s voters and 76.14 percent of York County’s voters.

The Races

The closest race wasn’t for an office at all — it was for a bond referendum in James City County that would have helped fund stormwater projects. The referendum failed, with 64 percent of county residents voting against it. The referendum was supported by 58 percent of absentee voters, however.

If approved, the referendum would have allowed county government to borrow up to $30 million to pay for needed stormwater improvements. Some of the stormwater projects needing funding are based on federal and state mandates, while other repairs include fixing the county’s aging infrastructure and addressing flooding problems.

The Board of Supervisors unanimously agreed to put the referendum on the ballot earlier this year, but in the last days before the election, members split over whether they supported the referendum. Members Jim Icenhour and John McGlennon both came out in favor of the referendum, but fellow supervisors Jim Kennedy and Bruce Goodson did not support it. On Tuesday morning, voters passed new red signs reading “Vote No to More Debt” as they drove to their polling precincts.

After polls closed on Tuesday night, both Icenhour and Kennedy said they didn’t expect the referendum to pass. “Scare tactics are usually effective,” Icenhour said. “People often want something done, and don’t want to pay for it.” He predicts nothing related to stormwater spending will pass until after next year’s election, when the Republican members of the board will be campaigning.

Kennedy said Tuesday’s vote showed that citizens are watching government spending right now. “They sent this message, and I’m listening loud and clear,” he said, adding that Icenhour and McGlennon should listen, too. Kennedy said he spoke to many voters Tuesday, and the “trickery by my Democratic colleagues weighed heavily on the people I spoke to.”

Voters throughout the Triangle cast votes for their congressional representative, with incumbent Rob Wittman, R-1st, keeping his seat with 65 percent of the total vote. Only in Williamsburg did his Democrat challenger, Krystal Ball, take the lead; she received 51 percent of the vote in the city.

In James City County, School Board Member Jim Kelly was unopposed in his race and won the seat with 97 percent of the vote; 119 voters chose to write in candidates. Kelly was chosen by the Williamsburg-James City County School Board to fill former member Mary Ann Maimone’s seat in the Berkeley district last year after she had to leave early due to familial obligations. To keep the seat following his appointment, he had to be elected to finish her term. At the completion of Maimone’s original term next year, Kelly will again have the option to run for the seat, this time to begin his own term.

Comments  

 
+3 #7 Guest 2010-11-04 15:33
I think this infrastructure upgrades should be funded by the developmental projects that drive the need. If it were not for impervious surfaces, we would not need to upgrades; it is no shock to the community that development is the number one driving force behind storm water handling needs. I say we start tacking on a storm water retrofit permit requirement for new developmental projects that is directly related to their impervious foot print. This will do a few things for us, 1) It will prevent developers from developing land in speculation such as Settlers Marketplace, this is a huge parking lot for no reason; 2)It will help pay for the storm water retrofits that are developmentally driven; 3) It will slow development and make developers put serious thought into their designs and how to limit run-off through voluntary increased buffers.
Quote
 
 
+2 #6 Guest 2010-11-04 10:53
I agree with DEE, this should not be a political issue. How will the county raise the capital for these necessary infrastructure projects, hold a bake sale?

It is likely the cheapest in my lifetime for the county (which has a AAA bond rating) to borrow money through a bond. I don't want to hear a single peep out of anyone who voted against this (including supervisors) when the inevitable tax increase occurs...
Quote
 
 
+4 #5 Guest 2010-11-04 07:30
How much public money did Kennedy and Goodson waste by urging a referendum on something they subsequently sabotaged? I'm very curious to know how much this stormwater referendum cost us JCC taxpayers.
Quote
 
 
+2 #4 Guest 2010-11-03 22:12
Of course scare tactics were used, just like they are being used against the Chesapeake Bay cleanup plan. Opponents are saying the Bay cleanup plan will cost the area a billion dollars. That is ridiculous but has made everyone afraid of the plan.

If Kennedy were honorable he would have publicly stated whether he supported it or not and why. The voters of James City County should be aware of supervisors who hold secret positions on issues in the county.

At least Icenhour and McGlennon were honest enough to tell the public where they stood on it and inform them why. What you are calling a secret gentlemen's agreement, I call a backdoor deal hidden from the public.

Its a problem that has to be fixed before it gets too expensive. Icenhour & McGlennon recognize this and know that now is the time to pass funding to fix the stormwater problem while interest rates are at historic lows. Kennedy and Goodson recognize it too, but they would rather pass the buck so other people can make the tough decision when the fix will be more expensive than ever.

I hope people remember that when the bill comes due and is twice the cost it is now and only gets half the problem solved.
Quote
 
 
+6 #3 Guest 2010-11-03 17:47
I don't know why politics had to play a role in fixing the ancient infrastructure that plagues James City in the first place. I guess it will take citizens/board of supervisor's cars being driven into sink holes from broken pipes to finally get the attention they need.
Quote
 
 
+3 #2 Guest 2010-11-03 17:04
As for me, scare tactics had nothing to do with it. I simply want nothing to do with handing over a 30 million dollar blank check for a project that will likely end up costing much more than that, and still may not measure up to the EPA requirements. Let's see a proposal which has been more carefully researched and planned, with a more accurate cost projection first. Then we'll have a real discussion.
Quote
 
 
+2 #1 Guest 2010-11-03 10:36
I don't believe scare tactics were ever used. If you look closely at the absentee results, the referendum probably would have passed. The fact mr. Icenhour and Mr. McGlennon didn't live up to a gentlemen's agreement is the reason the republicans came out against it. It was a last minute trick that backfired very badly. Give the voters more respect than saying they fell for "scare tactics". This is the first referendum item to fail since the early 80's. Take notice, heed the advice from voters.
Quote
 

Add comment

WYDaily invites you to join the community conversation. We expect civil discourse here. Personal attacks on others, indecent language and bad manners in general are unwelcome.


Security code
Refresh

Talk of the Town

Talk of the Town