LeftColumnBK

Amendments Pass Statewide, Triangle's Results Different

All three constitutional amendments proposed on the Virginia ballot earned voter approval Tuesday, two by an overwhelming margin and one with little room to spare.

The first question, asking to allow localities to grant real estate tax exemptions to low-income seniors without having to go through the General Assembly, easily passed. Statewide, 76 percent of voters voted in favor, with 24 percent voting against.

The second question, asking to exempt veterans who are completely disabled from their time in the service — or their surviving spouses — from property taxes on their principal residence, gained much support. Statewide, 82 percent of all voters agreed with the exemption; 18 percent voted against it. About 7,300 veterans in Virginia would benefit from this exemption, which the Virginia Municipal League objected to because it gave state control over a local issue.

The third question, a request to increase the cash cap on the state's “rainy day fund” by 50 percent, squeaked by. Statewide, 51 percent of voters agreed with the request; 49 percent voted against it.

Locally, voters were generally more divided on the first two amendments, but still the majority favored passage.

For the third amendment, increasing the amount lawmakers can deposit into an account to rely on during tough economic times, local voters were more divided - despite support from state Republicans and Democrats alike. In James City County, 53.6 percent of voters cast votes against the measure, with 46.2 percent voting for it. In York County, the measure failed by just 86 votes. Williamsburg voters approved it more decisively than statewide results, with 57.5% of the vote in favor.

Question 1 (allowing localities to grant property tax relief for low-income seniors)
James City County residents voted in favor, 66.45 percent to 33.54%
City of Williamsburg residents voted in favor, 69.59% to 30.40%
York County residents voted in favor, 76.86% to 23.13%

Question 2 (property tax exemption for certain veterans)
James City County residents voted in favor, 75.7% to 24.9%
City of Williamsburg residents voted in favor, 78.45% to 21.54%
York County residents voted in favor, 78.79% to 21.20%

Question 3 (increasing the state's rainy day fund cap)
James City County residents voted against, 53.57% to 46.42%
City of Williamsburg residents voted in favor, 57.55% to 42.44%
York County residents voted against, 50.22% to 49.77%

Comments  

 
+5 #4 Guest 2010-11-03 21:24
Seriously, do either of you know anything about the "rainy day fund" at all? The state has spent most of it during the last two years (about $1 billion) to avoid tax increases at the worst possible time while attempting to keep critical services like schools and public safety in place. The amendment did not require an increase in the fund, it simply allowed the General Assembly to possibly save more in the future. In fact it even had bipartisan support in Richmond...perh aps I can explain it more clearly: IT IS NOT A TAX!
On the other hand, JCC voters seem to prefer higher taxes as they decisively voted down the stormwater bond referendum. How else will the county possibly raise the required funds, hold a bake sale?
Quote
 
 
-2 #3 Guest 2010-11-03 15:43
The only valid one that should be pasted is the Disabled Veterans and the their families. We as Americans owe them that much.

The other two I voted against. I guess the seasoned citizens fell we owe them more than just Social Security, Medicare and prescription drug benefits, now we need to pickup their property taxes. Maybe the State can buy them their food, clothing, gas, car, etc... from the 15% "rainy day" fund.
Quote
 
 
-5 #2 Guest 2010-11-03 10:53
"When the people find that they can vote themselves money, that will herald the end of the republic." Benjamin Franklin

I voted NO to all three. If you are going to provide tax relief, then tax relief should be for ALL citizens.
Quote
 
 
+5 #1 Guest 2010-11-03 09:28
Wow, so we voted down the stormwater bond (which is the cheapest JCC will be able to borrow money in our lifetime) but also voted against allowing the state to save more money in good times so that they'll borrow less in lean times. I'm confused, if you have excellent credit (which JCC does) please explain to me how either financing a "house" with a conventional loan at an extremely low rate or increasing a "savings" account contribution is fiscally irresponsible?
Quote
 

Add comment

WYDaily invites you to join the community conversation. We expect civil discourse here. Personal attacks on others, indecent language and bad manners in general are unwelcome.


Security code
Refresh

Talk of the Town

Talk of the Town