LeftColumnBK

WJCC Board Supports New Alt Ed Concept, But Wants To Learn More

About 20 speakers passionately spoke in an effort to save the Academy for Life and Learning from potential closure at the Williamsburg-James City County School Board meeting on Tuesday night.

But board members also spoke passionately, saying that they would like to help more students than the 40 currently served by the division’s alternative education program, called ALL. They weighed in on a proposal, prepared by Acting Superintendent Scott Burckbuchler and Assistant Superintendent for Academic Services Dianna Lindsay, that would disband the school in favor of hiring three middle school “deans” to serve as advocates for struggling students in the division.

The majority of the board said they supported the concept of deans, but want the conversation to continue, in hopes of better defining “at-risk,” finding alternative disciplinary actions to suspensions and ensuring the most children can be served at every level. Member Jim Kelly said he was conflicted, but said the members should be. “It’s something we should be conflicted about and something we should think all the way through,” he said.

Four years ago, the school division disbanded the Center for Education Opportunities, its alternative education program that served both students with disciplinary problems and students at risk of failing. In its place, the division created ALL, a school housed in trailers on the grounds of Eastern State Mental Hospital. At ALL, led by Principal Anthony Mungin, students wore uniforms and received one-on-one attention, along with lessons in character education. He advocated for separating the disciplinary cases from the struggling students, which resulted in a refocus of the program in 2008. Since then, the program has moved into the annex at the former James Blair Middle School.

In its four years, the school has shown success at turning around seventh- and eighth-grade students in danger of failing. On Tuesday, students, parents and community members shared stories of success, speaking emotionally about how ALL helped students pass SOLs or earn A’s and B’s for the first times in their school careers.

Student Jazzmine Bulluck told the board that she believes she is the student she wants to be at the ALL Academy. “ I went to James Blair last year and I don’t even think my principal knew who I was,” she said tearfully. “When I go to the ALL Academy, my principal actually speaks to me.”

Resident Sue Wilson said the academy has produced results where others have failed, saying, “The time has come to end this benign neglect of students.” She promised the community would be watching the board as it moved forward.

Joseph Hayes, a William and Mary student and president of a tutoring program called Project ALL, said ALL has a proven track record that should be valued. “It seems that it would be very irresponsible to let go of a successful program to start a program that has no proof of success,” he said.

Burckbuchler told the board that the “dean” plan would serve more children, but also cut costs in a time when budgets are increasingly constrained. As presented, the dean plan would cost $300,000. He also said the plan represents a “paradigm shift” from pulling students out of their home schools for alternative education to serving them more effectively in their regular schools.

Lindsay said she envisioned the deans as advocates for children who are struggling to keep up. “I don’t see this person as a disciplinarian or someone who doles out after-school suspension,” she said, adding that the current behavior specialists employed at the high school level would serve as models for the job description.

Board member Denise Koch said that many of the disciplinary cases the board reviews have to do with interactions between teachers and students. Lindsay acknowledged that teacher-student relationships are crucial to student success, and that students need someone who is “a mediator, arbitrator…someone who can talk for the student or the teacher.”

Lindsay said the deans’ duties would be wide and varied, and could include chatting with students during lunch, making home visits, working with guidance counselors and more. They would also work to establish individualized study plans for students and the division aims to have the deans serve at least 40 students in each school. She said the dean program is already used in several school divisions, including Boston’s schools, and WJCC’s would incorporate elements of the AVID and ALL programs.

Board members expressed concern about the lack of a definition for “at-risk” and wondered why the school division aims to serve 40 students per school. Lindsay said the number is based on how many students are currently served by ALL, and she believes the division has many more children not being reached.

In his statements, Board Chair James Nickols said nothing is as sweet in one’s mouth as the taste of success. To the audience of ALL students, parents and advocates, he said, “I think I was hearing that you have tasted the success of learning at ALL…what we want to do is have more children taste the success.”

The board did not make any motions to approve the proposal, which is still labeled as a draft, but Nickols previously said it is likely to come to a vote before a new superintendent is hired by the end of the month. To read the full proposal for the new alternative education plan, click here.

Comments  

 
+21 #2 Guest 2010-12-08 08:58
Seriously, why does everything with the WJCC School Board seemed so rushed? If, in fact, there is a problem with the current system, why not research the different programs that have been successful in other communities like ours? Why does it seem like this is yet another decision being rammed down our throats?

I have no "inside track" where I would have known about this any sooner, so it is through the media's reporting of this that I even know about it. Now that I know about it, it seems that there is a huge push to vote on this new "dean" system without much research being conducted.

I watched the meeting on TV last night, and it appeared to me that none of the board members knew anything about this "dean program" being presented by Staff, as there were many questions raised yet, all but two members supported the idea. From what I saw, the board members were going to support whatever Staff recommended to them without much work being done on their part to understand the real issue along with alternatives to correct the issue.

The ALL program appears to be working at this point. Why the rush to change it? Secondly, how in the world can anyone think that one "dean" can do what a host of teachers and administrators have done with 40 students? These students need individualized attention. The reason they're in the ALL program is that they didn't get this type of attention in their home school. One "dean" who has to spread his attention amongst an average of 40 students will not have the same effect that the Academy has had. It takes more than one person to accomplish the goals of this program.

If going to a "dean system" is presented as a cost savings, I think Staff is pulling the wool over the board members' eyes. It might be an immediate savings of 200,000 dollars, but when the "dean program" is in place, it should be quickly learned that it is going to take more than one person to make it successful. This means additional costs associated with wages and benefits of these new hires.

I just don't get it! It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize that three "deans" versus a host of teachers and administrators is a recipe for disaster. I'm very disappointed in our school board members. Watching them "in action" last night was a huge disappointment.

Don't rush to another decision. Study this one and do it right for a change!
Quote
 
 
+17 #1 Guest 2010-12-08 07:06
Seems a lot of this decision is being based on what people think and feel, rather than what's actually known through genuine program evaluation.

What is the actual track record of success/failure for the Dean strategy in other school systems? Do these other systems resemble WJCC, namely, will their success predict success for our kids? Or do they just feel it might?

Does WJCC actually know how many kids are in our system that could benefit from the Dean approach? Or do they just feel there are lots of them?

It just doesn't feel like there's a whole lot of substance or data behind the various strategies being proposed. The Board shouldn't make decisions based on a hunch or what they "feel might work."
Quote
 

Add comment

WYDaily invites you to join the community conversation. We expect civil discourse here. Personal attacks on others, indecent language and bad manners in general are unwelcome.


Security code
Refresh

Talk of the Town

Talk of the Town