LeftColumnBK

Parents Of ALL Students Plan to Lobby to Save Program

Since learning the Williamsburg-James City County School Board might approve a plan to dismantle the Academy for Life and Learning, parents have been trying to save the program that they say has saved their kids.

A group of parents whose children are enrolled in the alternative education program gathered at the Williamsburg Regional Library on Thursday night to strategize ways to convince the board not to close ALL.

Responding to board concerns that not enough children were being reached, the administration presented a proposal at last week’s meeting that would close the academy and place three “deans” in the division’s middle schools. As explained by Assistant Superintendent for Academic Services Dianna Lindsay, the deans would serve as advocates for students struggling in the classroom. They would work almost as case workers, ensuring that students get the services they need.

At the Dec. 7 board meeting, Acting Superintendent Scott Burckbuchler said the dean plan would serve more children than ALL, which currently has about 46 students enrolled, and would cut costs. ALL’s budget this year was $570,000; as presented, the dean plan would cost $300,000. He also said the plan represents a “paradigm shift” from pulling students out of their home schools for alternative education to serving them more effectively in their regular schools.

The parents of students at ALL agree that the dean plan sounds like a good one, but not at the cost of dismantling the academy. At Thursday’s meeting, they all shared battle stories about trying to get help for their children in the past, their amazement at their children’s achievement at ALL and their fears that their children will slip through the cracks when they return to their home schools.

The Academy for Life and Learning was created four years ago. The school was initially supposed to serve both students with disciplinary problems and students at risk of failing. But after its first year, the program was retooled to serve only the students who were struggling; since then, the school has shown success at helping students pass SOLs and earn A’s and B’s for the first times in their lives.

Parents marvelled at the change in their students in the short time some of them have attended ALL. At the school, led by Principal Anthony Mungin, students wear uniforms and receive one-on-one attention, including home visits and weekly calls to parents. Shelley Easter, whose daughter Brooke is in the 7th grade, said the quality of life in her home has vastly improved since Brooke started at ALL in September.

She shared that when her husband tagged along to an informational meeting before the year started, he walked away amazed, saying, “They already care about Brooke and they haven’t met her yet.”

Mike Jenkins said that at his lowest moments in the past, his son Nathan had asked how old he had to be before he could drop out of school. Now, he says, Nathan is talking about going to college.

With just a few days before the board is expected to vote on the proposal, the group tried to come up with ways to lobby the school board to at least delay a vote until the division’s next superintendent is named later this month. They also discussed advocating that the division test the dean plan for one year and gather data before making a permanent decision. Many of them felt the deans could recruit children for ALL.

Most of the parents never heard of ALL until it was either recommended by their child’s principal or they received a phone call from Mungin over the summer. Easter said she recently told her daughter’s former guidance counselor that Brooke is excelling at ALL and the counselor said she had never heard of the program.

The parents plan to fill the audience at Tuesday’s meeting, but will also send e-mails to school board members and try to recruit other advocates to speak up for the program. They’re already worrying about what will happen without ALL.

“I know my daughter will just disappear back into her shell again,” said Vanessa Johnson. “I’m scared to send her to high school.”

The board will have a work session at 7 p.m. on Dec. 21 in Building F of the county complex.

Comments  

 
+3 #5 Guest 2010-12-17 23:17
Parents/Student s don't hear about STEP program but it existED. Parents don't hear about ALL until it's noted by ALL staff...even the Guidance Counselor hadn't heard of it. While this isn't special ed, seems there needs to be less input my Lindsay and more from Student Services who are going NOTICABLY UNSPOKEN! Good luck to the students and parents!
Quote
 
 
+5 #4 Guest 2010-12-17 12:15
It is strange, when the School Board needs money to study how best to renovate James Blair or how to redistrict they seem to find the funds.

Now, the School Board wants to do away with ALL. Where are their priorities? The school board needs to see that ALL is a program that is reaching students who were once seen as unreachable. Watch the last school board meeting (on line or on ch 47)to hear the testimony of students and parents from ALL. You will be moved. Middle school students changing their attitude about school? We should be studying why its working instead of tossing it out for something that is a unknown. The "Deans"/guidanc e counselors proposal could compliment the ALL program but could not replace it.

Go by and see the ALL program, see for yourself the great things that are happening there. Also, come to the school board meeting to support this important program!

This community needs to support programs that work. Don't let the ALL program die.!

This School Board has eliminated other programs that were helping students. Programs that expose students to many career /life pathways. Several Career & Tech classes, Family Consumer Science and STEP all eliminated. Programs that were working!
Quote
 
 
+5 #3 Guest 2010-12-17 11:41
The School Board seems to present an either/or scenario - ALL as it exists or academic deans in the schools. So ... critical student needs go unmet and we get more administrators. Who gains here?
Quote
 
 
+4 #2 Guest 2010-12-17 09:53
Knowing so well, from within, the local school system, I so understand what Vanessa Johnson meant when she pleaded, "I know my daugthter will disappear back into her shell again."
Just one proven background success of a student like this one IS worth the program to continue on...IT WORKS!! But we know, I know from within, that ALL is needed and MUST continue! All of you who KNOW and are listening, now, UNITE, strongly, to enlighten our public in backing and continuing our local Academy for Life and Learning, Vanessa Johnson, parent, and others...unite (strongly) and, respectfully, MAKE "them" listen...and succeed!...plea se.
Quote
 
 
+7 #1 Guest 2010-12-17 09:25
ALL is a powerful, effective program. The decision to cut ALL is not about its effectiveness, it is about funding and the budget. Unfortunately, the School Board does not have the power to set tax rates to pay for good programs such as ALL. Only the City Council and County Supervisors can do that. The School Board must go hat-in-hand each year to these two municipal boards and do the best with the pittance they are thrown. The School Board can only do so much with what they are given, and this is what is driving the ALL decision.

Therefore, to provide a more stable foundation for ALL, advocates for the program must also communicate with the JCC Supes and the City Council in order to solve the funding and budget concerns. This will be challenging because the prevailing local sentiment is that residents prefer lower taxes over effective programs for kids.
Quote
 

Add comment

WYDaily invites you to join the community conversation. We expect civil discourse here. Personal attacks on others, indecent language and bad manners in general are unwelcome.


Security code
Refresh

Talk of the Town

Talk of the Town