LeftColumnBK

Chamber's Exec. Committee Extends Schreiber's Contract; Pay Not Disclosed

The executive committee of the Greater Williamsburg Chamber and Tourism Alliance has decided to extend the president’s contract through 2013, information they shared with the rest of the board of directors last week.

Alliance President and CEO Dick Schreiber has been with the organization since 2005. Though the executive committee doesn’t share salary information as a general rule, even with the Alliance’s board of directors, according to 2009 tax records (the most recent available) Schreiber earned a combined income of $268,200 the year previous. None of the government officials WYDaily spoke with were aware of Schreiber’s salary, including one official who serves on the Alliance’s Board of Directors, though combined local governments contributed $2.3 million to the Alliance in the Alliance’s fiscal year 2009.

According to Guidestar, an organization based in Williamsburg that gathers and publishes financial data from nearly all national nonprofits,
there’s no rule of thumb for determining appropriate nonprofit executive pay. Guidestar, however, recommends looking at the pay of executives at comparable organizations when determining what’s fair.

The Chamber's Decision-Makers

The Greater Williamsburg's Chamber and Tourism Alliance's 2010-2011 Executive Committee members are:
Joe Cantrell, Kings Creek Plantation, and current Chairman of the Alliance Board
Kevin Walsh, Walsh Family Chiropractic Center, PC and current Vice Chair
John Hallowell, Colonial Williamsburg Foundation, Hospitality Division and current Vice Chair
Marshall Warner, Chesapeake Bank, serving as Treasurer
Jim Golden, College of W&M, Immediate Past Chair
Thomas Austin, Jr., Berret's Seafood Restaurant & Taphouse/Riverwalk Restaurant
John Bacon, Colonial Williamsburg Foundation
Mark Duncan, Colonial Williamsburg Foundation
Randall Foskey, Foskey Phillips Marketing/Advertising
Michael Fox, College of W&M
John Moorman, Williamsburg Regional Library
Robert J. Singley, Sr., RJS & Associates, Inc.

No one WYDaily contacted either knew or would say what Schreiber's current compensation is. According to tax records filed by the Alliance, Schreiber’s salary and other compensation after a nearly $62,000 raise in 2008 was approximately $268,200. The total revenue of the Alliance for 2008 based on their 2009 990 tax forms was $3.1 million, of which local governments funded $2.3 million. Schreiber’s salary was nearly nine percent of the organization’s total income.

The Alliance recently commissioned a tourism destination study, which looked at other tourist locations in the country comparable to Williamsburg, including Savannah, Ga., and Asheville, S.C. Based on 2009 tax forms, the president of Asheville’s Chamber of Commerce (the comparable nonprofit in that area) had a salary and other compensation totaling about $264,800. The organization had annual revenues of $3.8 million, $1.7 of which came from local governments, putting the president’s pay at 6.9 percent of the organization’s income.

Savannah’s joint chamber of commerce and convention and visitors bureau (organized like Williamsburg’s Alliance) had total revenues in 2008 of $7.3 million. The president and CEO of the organization had a salary and other compensation totaling $324,000, or 3.8 percent of the organization’s total income.

The convention and visitors bureau in Orlando, Fla., with annual revenues of $40.9 million, paid its chief executive officer about $339,400 in 2008, less than one percent of the organization’s total income.

Looking more locally, Hampton Roads Chamber of Commerce, which had revenues in 2008 of $3.7 million, paid its president $227,900 (which was reduced from $231,800 the year before), which constituted about six percent of the group’s total income.

According to the International Association of Convention & Visitors Bureaus 2002 salary survey, the median for total CEO compensation was $233,051 for groups with a budget of $7.5 million or more, or 3.1 percent or less of total revenue.

Since the recession began in 2008, local governments have had to significantly scale back contributions to organizations like the Alliance due to reduced revenues. Due to a sharp decline in room and meal tax dollars, the city of Williamsburg proposed reducing the Alliance’s funding from $880,000 to $627,000 in the current fiscal year (2011), though the city later agreed to add back $50,000.

James City County cut funding to the Alliance by $100,000 in 2011, and York County cut funding by $20,000 in 2011. The Alliance’s most recent available tax forms don’t represent these cuts or the reduction in membership revenues due to 30 hoteliers withdrawing from the Alliance in July 2009, meaning Schreiber’s salary is now a higher percentage of the organization’s revenue.

Williamsburg Mayor Clyde Haulman said the city funds the Alliance to support their work as advocates for businesses and for tourism promotion.

As for his thoughts on the Alliance’s executive compensation, “We give funds to these agencies and expect them to use the funds wisely,” Haulman said, “but we don’t tie our contributions to salaries, we tie them to the purpose of the organization. We’re not in the business of making their business decisions.”

Haulman said he did not know the amount of Schreiber’s salary, though. Neither did James City County Board Chairman Jim Kennedy, but he agreed with Haulman that the county’s goal when funding the Alliance was to fund tourism promotion.

Kennedy suggested speaking with John McGlennon, the Board of Supervisors member who currently serves on the Alliance’s board. McGlennon did not know Schreiber’s salary, either.

McGlennon said local tax dollars contributed to the Alliance (which totaled $2.3 million in the Alliance’s fiscal year 2009) go directly to tourism generation, marketing and the like, not to salaries or other overhead costs, which the county’s finance department corroborated.

Based on the Alliance’s 2009 tax forms, however, the income generated by member dues, fundraising events, special projects and other income amounted to roughly $775,000, which was not enough to cover employee salaries ($716,200) and  top executives ($346,800) without some use of taxpayer funds.

McGlennon suggested the higher executive salary amount might be explained by the Alliance’s dual role as a chamber of commerce and a CVB.

The Alliance’s board of directors, a 35-member group, doesn’t negotiate the executive contracts or pay as a whole body. Those decisions are left to the 13-member executive committee, chaired this year by Joe Cantrell. Cantrell let the board know last Thursday that Schreiber’s contract had been renewed.

Cantrell said the members of the executive committee “all feel that Dick has done a good job over the past years, especially in the face of a tough economy. This is a critical time [for the Alliance]; not only are we facing economic challenges, but we’re launching new initiatives we’ve never tried before, and [Vice President] Bob Hershberger left last year, so we felt it was critical to have continuity at the top.”

Schreiber’s contract was set to expire on September 30, 2011, and was renewed through 2013.

When asked how the executive committee measured the success of a president, Cantrell said the committee has an extensive annual performance review process in which they consider whether the Alliance has met a majority of its annual goals. The committee also looks at what outside circumstances might have influenced performance that were not controllable  - like the recession.

Schreiber has consistently done a good job and “he has a proven track record,” Cantrell said.

As for the $268,200 salary Schreiber makes (based on 2009 tax forms), Cantrell said it wasn’t committee practice to discuss numbers, but he said the executive committee “did an informal review to compare other like-sized chambers and CVBs on Guidestar” to come up with a reasonable pay amount, which “fell into the middle or just above middle” range.

“We wanted to try to make sure he is fairly compensated at the market rate,” he said. “[Schreiber’s] salary has to be competitive.”

The IRS is interested in nonprofit executives' fair compensation at the going rate, too.

The Wall Street Journal in April 2009 reported that Lois Lerner, the IRS’s director of tax-exempt organizations, warned nonprofits that the IRS will be scrutinizing nonprofit tax forms, and that leaders should be sure to practice due diligence in making sure their executive pay can be justified through data on comparable practices at similar organizations.

"If you're not looking, we're looking," Lerner said at Georgetown University Law Center's Representing & Managing Tax-Exempt Organizations conference, according to the article. Read the full Wall Street Journal story here.

Comments  

 
0 #18 Guest 2011-01-08 07:26
Please let us know what are the annual performance review guidelines. What is Mr. Schreiber judged by? As for the promotion of tourism...one factor it is measured by "room night leads generated." Which means..nothing. In other words someone calls in, or a tradeshow is attended or a conversation is had about a group of people who may or may not be interested in visiting Williamsburg. 50 rooms for three nights or 150 room nights. So the lead is generated to all the hotels who are members of the Chamber. The group decides to go to Florida but the lead nights generated are still counted as a success. Now its not GWCTA's fault they did not book at one of the hotels but is it the hotels' fault? The group would prefer an ocean front property, would like a rate in the 70's in July but need a rebate on the rate of $10 to help fund their organization. They need a banquet room on property to hold 125 people which counts out the select service hotels from bidding...in other words Williamsburg doesn't fit their needs but the lead is still counted. Other CVB's are required to show the amount of revenue generated by their efforts not just room night leads. This would require the hotels to be more forthcoming with their booking information but it would also mean GWCTA would have to be a little more precise about their efforts.
Finally, I believe the "salary" that is shown for Mr. Schreiber includes his health insurance and his 401K contribution both of which are available as a state employee. As for his "delayed salary" from CW, it is more commonly known as "retirement."
Quote
 
 
+16 #17 Guest 2010-12-23 16:13
My deepest respect goes to Desiree for putting out this article. Most all off this information, regarding salaries,a stacked executive committee, and general disregard thereof by elected officals, was known for years by all the"whinners" and Chamber "dropouts". This is the first time the people of our Tri-area have gotten any insight what-so-ever from a responsible source even though the Gazette has had this information for years.
Quote
 
 
+11 #16 Guest 2010-12-23 10:50
Say it aint so Joe! I Can't understand the thinking of the Chairman of the Alliance, how could disregard his membership. I haven't yet found a member in support of extending this contract.
Quote
 
 
+8 #15 Guest 2010-12-23 10:44
Time for things to change. Now the true colors of the Alliance are beginning to show and they are not pretty. Its time the community had a true business run/fully transparent organization instead of this quasi CW entity.
Quote
 
 
+16 #14 Guest 2010-12-23 09:59
Dear WYDaily.com,

Does the Executive Committee oversee the annual operating budget? If not, who does?

Is it possible for me, as a City resident, to see the annual budget of this "non"Profit?

Where are our local City and County "leaders" while this is happening?
Quote
 
 
+15 #13 Guest 2010-12-22 16:54
What is not generally known is that Mr. Schreiber has been receiving rather hefty deferred salary payments from a previous employer - Colonial Williamsburg. The reporter should look that up as well. All this aside, he has publicly stated that he "doesn't worry" about member businesses because he receives the vast majority of his funding from "other sources." Keep digging, Desiree. Interview any of the employees who have left the Chamber in the past three or so years. They all have stories to tell.
Quote
 
 
+14 #12 Guest 2010-12-22 16:28
Actually, I would have to say that RU Kidding is correct. There is no diversity among the members of the executive committee of the Chamber. I don't think that makes someone a racist to point out a lack of diversity. It's just a fact. I am actually shocked that none of the professional and capable women or ethnic minorities or students aren't screaming at the top of their lungs for some semblance of representation at the executive level.
Quote
 
 
-23 #11 Guest 2010-12-22 14:02
So ru kidding is obviosly a racist and a sexist. It does not matter what race or sex they are.It only matter what they do or do not do. If they were Black or Female you would have not said a word, So why are you bringing your racism and sexism into this conversation? Maybe W/JCC is not seeing tourism dollars is because it is so expensive and boring, oh wait it is not you can go to busch gardens and get a beer in the little kids area and playwith your toddler while you get smashed. Yeah, I want to vacation in W/JCC.
Quote
 
 
+19 #10 Guest 2010-12-22 13:47
It is absolutely astounding to me that in this day and age, where the accepted norm is now open discussion and total transparency that the Executive committee continues to operate like the Old Boy Network. If they can't see that the changes in leadership in this town over the last 10 years are headed in a different direction, then they are in denial. Their unwillingness to move forward has already created rifts in the community and they need to realize that every time they make a decision like this it only makes things worse. Each and every one of the names listed above is a very well respected member of our community. I hope that they will sooner rather than later understand that a broken Old Boy Network( which this town now has) is detrimental not only to this organization but to their own reputations. If they are all so confident in the decision then why the reluctance to discuss it openly before it is made. One can only conclude that the mentality is ingrained that control and power should stay with the few. Unfortunately, when the confidence in the few is lost, then the result is desertion. For the sake of the organization let's hope that the few step up and accept the seriousness of their actions.
Quote
 
 
+5 #9 Guest 2010-12-22 12:07
I'm sorry...one other point - I just noticed the side box to this article, the “decision makers”. 7 & out of 12 decision makers do currently work for or had once worked for Colonial Williamsburg and or the College. Not to mention that they are all white males over 40. Do I need to say more?
Quote
 

Add comment

WYDaily invites you to join the community conversation. We expect civil discourse here. Personal attacks on others, indecent language and bad manners in general are unwelcome.


Security code
Refresh

Talk of the Town

Talk of the Town