LeftColumnBK

WJCC Board Will Learn More About Dean Proposal Tonight

The Williamsburg-James City County School Board will learn more tonight about the proposed “deans” who, if approved, would replace an existing alternative education program.

In December, the administration introduced a proposal to close the Academy for Life and Learning, which currently has 46 seventh- and eighth-graders enrolled, and add “deans” to the three middle schools to serve as liaisons who will identify and guide struggling students.If approved, the plan could trim an estimated $270,000 from the budget and serve more than 40 students at each school.

The board has not approved the plan, but at a Dec. 7 meeting, the members asked Assistant Superintendent for Academic Services Dianna Lindsay to flesh out the job description for the deans. Tonight, she’ll present that job description, along with a model of an individualized learning plan, which deans will create to help the struggling students in their respective schools.

In Lindsay’s proposal, the dean job would now be identified as “student advancement coach.” By definition, the student advancement coach would be responsible for overall “student advancement, management, intervention and transition of learners in grades 6-8.” The coaches would also work closely with colleagues in the high schools, counselors, social workers, psychologists, faculty, parents and each school’s leadership team.

The coaches would be part of a process to personalize the middle schools by helping students assess their talents and goals, plan toward their purposes, collaborate on challenging tasks, maintain records and demonstrate their learning, according to the job description.

To do this, the coaches would be tasked to “create structures” that wouldn’t allow students to remain anonymous in middle school; establish schedules that will allow the coach to learn each student’s abilities and family situation; create Individualized Learning Plans that document students’ goals, strengths, weaknesses, interests and progress; provide opportunities for students to learn societal values; offer opportunities for involvement to parents, families and community members; ensure the physical and mental needs of students are addressed; and provide students with opportunities to demonstrate their talents and abilities.

The work of the coach will be guided by the research of the Educational Alliance at Brown University, which identifies six developmental needs. The students’ needs are: voice, belonging, choice, freedom, imagination and success.

The coaches would also take roles in mediation, investigating and providing follow-up for disputes, along with tracking cases and monitoring recommendations for student behavior issues related to transitions between grades. The job description also says the coaches will “coordinate student behavior and school discipline in a democratic school.”

To be considered for the coach positions, applicants would be required to possess a master’s degree in education, counseling, rehabilitation or a related field, and would preferably have experience in behavior management, special education, social work or transition counseling. The successful candidate would also have experience working in secondary schools, a social work background for an agency or school, experience with special needs learners and an administrative background.

Lindsay will also present a model of the form used to create Individualized Learning Plans. On the form, the coach will define the student’s skills in math and reading as “advanced, proficient, partially proficient and novice,” record test results and SOL results. The coach will also record the student’s academic, career and personal/social goals, the expectations of parents and his or her own recommendations for the student.

Lindsay’s presentation will be an information item during the meeting. At the same meeting, the board will choose its chair, vice chair and Parliamentarian for 2011. The meeting will begin at 7 p.m. in the City Council chambers in the Stryker Building.

Comments  

 
-10 #6 Guest 2011-01-04 16:11
The school board "asked Assistant Superintendent for Academic Services Dianna Lindsay to flesh out the job description." The ALL Academy is not sustainable - it requires too many resources for too few students. Let Dr. Lindsay define the best way to address the needs of students who are struggling. With her professional training she has analyzed the current research, and she has made a recommendation. Unless the School Board has similar expertise they shouldn't second guess her. Because ultimately, the responsibility for success or failure of the "dean" program falls to Dr. Lindsay. If the board ties her to some other program or keeps the status quo, then they are in effect saying that they have more expertise in student success than she does.
Quote
 
 
+5 #5 Guest 2011-01-04 13:15
The breaking news that the so called Dean or student advancement coach further confirms the whole exercise all along has been about eliminating the ALL Program. How convenient to introduce the Brown University TEA at this time. We conducted an experiment with the ALL program for three years and it proved its success in helping kids with social-emotiona l and learning challenges. But, we cannot accept those results and now it is said we are going to conduct another experiment at the expense of the kids in the ALL Program. This may satisfy or 'scholarship and poor intellectual egos' but unfortunately we are doing it in total disregard for what is in the interest of disadvantaged kids and future cost to the community and our nation.
Quote
 
 
-11 #4 Guest 2011-01-04 10:49
The Education Alliance [TEA] at Brown University has been in the business of making a difference in educational environments since 1975, especially in the fields of equity and diversity.
The powerful work of TEA projects and training has helped school systems across our Nation deliver transformative outcomes.

The entire WJCC school division needs to be guided by and engaged in the research and findings of TEA, and not just the 'achievement coaches'.

And we must recognize the pervasive nature of the issues facing WJCC and accept the fact that TEA or any other worthy initiative is not a panacea [magic pill]. The Academy for Life and Learning [ALL] and the proposed DEANS are not the REAL issues.

There are REAL systemic problems gnawing at the infrastructure of WJCC schools. But, as has been seen in past 'flavor of the day-quick fix, band-aid' approaches to issues, I'm fearful the Administration and some of the School Board members will ignore the realities, attempt to manipulate the good work of TEA, and screw up this great opportunity to transform our school system.

But let's be hopeful a new voyage for public education in WJCC is being launched. I do commend Dr. Lindsay and the Cohort for their three years of inquiry and for bringing The Education Alliance'S resources to our shore. It's not a panacea but it can become a BEGINNING.
Quote
 
 
+12 #3 Guest 2011-01-04 09:57
Sounds interesting-- but not proven...why not phase it in, like the hybrid block.....inste ad of eliminating a proven, effective program, where student test scores out perform current middle school students not in the program, lets "test" this idea. Let's not screw up students who, for the 1st time in their academic life are succeeding in school. Let's continue what we know and do a small "test" of a "new" program. It seems the ultimate motivation for this "new" program is cost containment -- but as I've said before, can we really put a price on a diploma? Frankly, if we fail these kids now to save a buck, we still pay in the long run....housing an inmate in a jail cell is not cheap.....tax payers will pay, one way or the other -- eliminate a proven program to save a buck, build another jail....hummmmm m.....
Quote
 
 
+14 #2 Guest 2011-01-04 09:24
When a program is working well, it's a sad thing to see it dismantled because it costs money. The effectiveness of the academy doesn't seem to be in question. What do the SOL scores look like? What did they look like in year prior to the ALL? If the students prefer it and are progressing well in the smaller group setting, why not find creative ways to finance the program?

Adding another administrator to create learning plans, assess talents and goals, etc. will not helps students learn and achieve. Assessment is only helpful if action can be taken to match needs and resources. If some students just do better in smaller, more personalized settings, how will keeping them "anonymous" in a large setting have any hope of success? If the $270k buys success for 46 middle school students, I say it's a bargain!
Quote
 
 
+13 #1 Guest 2011-01-04 09:18
Seriously, when will the School Board ever get it?!

These children need individualized attention in a setting that is conducive to this. Keeping them in the classroom with 20+ other students who don't need the individualized attention is not going to work. Not only will it not work for the student, but it will be a distraction to the other students in the same class. Is this fair to either student or to the parents of these students?

How can the Board think that 1 "coach" can take on the responsibility of 40 children per school?! This number was tossed out at the last board meeting, suggesting that this program could reach out to potentially 40+ students at each school. There is a staff of educators, aides and administrators at ALL. How in the world will three "coaches" be able to perform the tasks and responsibilitie s of the current staff?

Alternative education should be focused on the students and the needs of these students. Placing these children back into the classroom where they once were unable to achieve is a huge mistake. Many of them spoke about how they were encouraged and felt "wanted" in the ALL program. They will not get this back at their home school, and the way the student feels about learning is critical to his success.

Whether you have a child that is directly or indirectly effected by this program, or even if you don't have children effected at all, it will have an effect on society. Statistically, children who drop out of school find themselves in trouble with the law, can't find and maintain jobs and have social issues that eventually have an adverse effect on society.

This "coach/dean" program is destined to do more damage than good. Stealing ESPN's saying, I say to the School Board, "Come on, Man!"
Quote
 

Add comment

WYDaily invites you to join the community conversation. We expect civil discourse here. Personal attacks on others, indecent language and bad manners in general are unwelcome.


Security code
Refresh

Talk of the Town

Talk of the Town