|
More Cuts Likely to Program for At-Risk ChildrenFriday, January 21, 2011 One of the programs managed by Child Development Resources is at risk of having its funding cut nearly in half due to state budget cutbacks. In 2003, CDR took over management of Williamsburg’s Comprehensive Health Investment Project (CHIP) program at the request of Williamsburg and James City County. CHIP of Virginia is a non-profit that oversees a network of about 30 local programs focused on improving children’s health and promoting wellness in low-income families. The Williamsburg CHIP program relies on the state, through CHIP of Virginia, for roughly half of its funding.CHIP of Virginia is slated to lose 46 percent of its state funding next fiscal year due to state cutbacks. Since CHIP of Williamsburg is one of the smaller organizations to receive funding, CDR Executive Director Paul Scott is concerned that the local program could lose all its state funding, which would amount to $152,000, or about half of CHIP of Williamsburg’s budget. “We are relatively small – though successful – and other [CHIP] programs are huge, some almost the size of CDR,” says Scott, explaining why he expects CHIP of Virginia to pass along such a big cut. Last year, CHIP of Virginia cut the local program’s funding by 11 percent. Scott has been attending all the pre-budget hearings in the Triangle in an effort to bring the local CHIP program to the attention of decision-makers and to let them know about the likely upcoming funding issue. He explained to James City County supervisors last week that the city of Williamsburg and James City County had asked CDR to take on the program years ago because it was a good fit, and that it will likely need more funding support if things go as expected. He has also traveled to the General Assembly. “We can’t lobby, but we can advocate,” he says, “so we do what we can to preserve the budget.” The local CHIP program has been very successful, according to Scott. CHIP of Williamsburg was contracted to serve 110 children each year; last year, it served 138. Of those children, 100 percent were immunized, one of the objectives of the program. Out of the 138 participants, all of the children got medical insurance and all of them have a medical home, which means the families had a doctor to cover the child’s care instead of relying on a hospital emergency room. Also, the children had a decrease in the intensity of medical services they needed as well as an overall reduction in medical services, another area which CDR uses to measure the program’s success. CHIP of Williamsburg’s staff is made up of one nurse and 4 other employees who conduct home visits. On top of getting young children immunizations, insurance and health care, CHIP also works with pregnant women to get them the care they need, which helps reduce overall medical costs and improves the health of the women and their babies. The local CHIP currently has 3 pregnant women enrolled in its program. Another aspect of CHIP is the ‘Parents as Teachers’ program, which Scott says gives families parenting education and support. “The fact is, parents are a child’s first and best teachers,” he says. Of the folks who are served by CHIP of Williamsburg, 95 percent of the families have incomes below the federal poverty level, 53 percent of enrolled parents have less than a high school education, and about 30 percent of families are living in a hotel, living in the homes of another family or in a temporary shelter. There are currently a few bills that state lawmakers are considering which would return some, or all, of the cut funding to CHIP of Virginia, which would likely mean good news for the local program. Until then, CDR is trying to be proactive by communicating with other agencies that fund CHIP locally. Should cuts happen, “Our focus will be serving those who are at highest risk,” says Scott. “It’s heartbreaking – that the high risk seem to suffer the most. But we’ll keep plugging along as best we can.” |
|
Copyright © 2010-2011 WY Daily. Davis Media, LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Website by Web-tactics
Website by Web-tactics



Comments
I find your chosen "name" ironic, but mostly sad. You're right on one point - paying for other people's laziness and irresponsibilit y is indeed never a good thing. However, I think that's where the common sense part of your argument ends. Making a global statement that infers that all poor families are lazy and irresponsible leads most to believe that you have no real sense of what it means to be poor. CHIP families, even those who begin their journey with this program as seemingly lazy or irresponsible, want what you want for your children. They just have more obstacles to getting it. Some are there due to life-altering events. Others are there because they are stuck in that horrible cycle of poverty. It's really not as easy as some think to rise above poverty. And when something seems really hard or insurmountable, human nature often leads us down a road of dispair. Even if one could rise above poverty, doing so to a level that is enough to sustain is even more difficult. Some people who have the hardest time rising above find it so difficult because all their life they've heard that poor people are lazy and irresponsible. Heck, most of them have been told this (and much worse) directly. How likely are people to accomplish a life goal without encouragement? Without at least one person in their corner to believe in them? If a struggling parent is given the tools to help them make a change, along with the encouragement every step of the way, their life and the life of their child is postively impacted. The more we, as a community, can support programs that help families improve their lifestyles and raise happier, healthier children, we're helping to shift a paradigm. I don't know about you, but I'd rather know that my money is going to help parents and their children work toward making a better life, becoming more productive citizens, ensuring that children are born healthy and stay that way, etc. rather than know that I will be asked to pay far more to help pay for indigent care, foster care (which in most, if not all, communities is more than 10 times the monetary cost of CHIP preventative services - I can't even begin to touch the emotional costs to the children), criminal justice system increases, etc. When I think of CHIP and programs like it, I can't help but recall the old saying, "An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure". Now that's common sense in my opinion. I'm praying that our state legislators see it the same way!
I really enjoyed reading your succinct comment. However it left me wondering, how exactly would my world be "better"?
Would I get the betterment of having our communitiy's infant mortality rates rise? Nothing say's "move here" to an expanding business looking to relocate, like really high infant mortality.
Would I enjoy the betterment of having to wait longer for an emergency room visit? I can't tell you how many times I hear about people rushing to the emergency room only to have to wait. It seems to me if we follow your advice we can all look forward to even longer waits. Not to mention higher cost.
Common Sense, I could go on...but I'd rather you chime in with some of that good old Conservative Wisdom and describe to me how eliminating an effective and cost saving program for the poor is going to make things "better".
Thanx