LeftColumnBK

Senate Bill Aims to Remove Councilman from Regional Marketing Committee

A bill currently up for a vote in the state Senate is likely intended to keep one particular city council member from serving on the Williamsburg Area Destination Marketing Committee.

State legislation created WADMC in 2004 and started a $2 per night, per room tax to fund Triangle marketing. The original legislation also laid out which organizations would have a seat at the table.

This year, local hotelier Doug Pons was chosen by the Williamsburg Hotel Motel Association as their representative to WADMC. Pons also serves on Williamsburg’s City Council. This is the first time a government official has represented a different organization on the committee, which likely provoked Sen. Tommy Norment to file a bill to keep such an overlap from happening.

The new proposal (bill 1344) would prohibit more than one person of the same local government or more than one person from the same organization from serving on WADMC. The bill has passed through committee and will be up for a vote on the Senate floor soon.

Norment was not available to speak to WYDaily on Tuesday, and his legislative assistant couldn’t comment on why Norment proposed the bill. His assistant did say there may be some changes made to the proposal, which wouldn’t be published on the Senate website until after the vote.

Pons, though, says he has heard talk that the bill might have been in retaliation against the WHMA for moving forward with its Tourist Information Center, which Norment didn’t support.

“I have a hard time believing Norment would be so spiteful,” Pons says. “There must be some other reason for [the bill].”

If the legislation is intended to keep the city from having an unfair advantage, Pons says no one he has talked to on WADMC or the various colleagues on council he’s discussed the issue with have a problem with him serving as representative for the WHMA on the committee.

“People wear multiple hats in the community when serving on various committees,” Pons says. Former Mayor Jeanne Zeidler served on WADMC while working with Colonial Williamsburg on the 2007 celebration, but that doesn’t mean CW got additional or unfair representation, he points out.

John Bacon, senior vice president for external affairs at Colonial Williamsburg, also has an overlap of commitment – he is a member of the Board of Directors for the Greater Williamsburg Chamber and Tourism Alliance (which has representation on WADMC) and he also serves as CW’s WADMC representative. According to the available version of the bill, Bacon’s seat could also be in question.

Williamsburg Mayor Clyde Haulman, who represents the city on WADMC, says he doesn’t think Pons serving as the WHMA representative is necessarily concerning.

If overlap happens, “the person has to remember who they’re representing, and then it shouldn’t be a problem,” Haulman says.

The proposed bill came as a surprise to Haulman, who hadn’t heard about it until recently. “I don’t see that it’s needed,” he says. “I don’t know how I’d feel if two [representatives] from York County or James City County served, but as long as it’s clear who they vote for, I think it’s fine.”

Norment serves on the Board of Trustees at the Jamestown Yorktown Foundation, is a Colonial Williamsburg Foundation trustee, and is also a teaching fellow at the College of William and Mary. “I assume Norment can make decisions for all these various organizations without conflict,” says Pons.

“This is a slap in the face to the city, the suggestion that a councilman who owns a business can’t be trusted to act appropriately in different positions,” says Pons. “It points to the vindictive nature of the bill.”

Comments  

 
-9 #7 Guest 2011-01-26 18:53
"This is the first time a government official has represented a different organization on the committee, which likely provoked Sen. Tommy Norment to file a bill to keep such an overlap from happening."

As an avid reader of WYDaily, I prefer to find such conjecture in Williamsburg's print newspaper, not here. Thanks!
Quote
 
 
+11 #6 Guest 2011-01-26 16:14
Please tell me Mr. Norment has better things to focus on than this. What a waste of taxpayers dollars.
Quote
 
 
+9 #5 Guest 2011-01-26 15:48
It’s a sad day when politicians use their influence, energies and tax payers’ money to squash entrepreneurial ism and volunteerism. This is a prime example of someone who has been in the general assembly TOO long. The power and prestige have gotten to our native son. Where is our soybean farmer – give him back.
Quote
 
 
+8 #4 Guest 2011-01-26 13:47
As a longtime Norment supporter, I have to say I am a bit puzzled as to why he would take such action without first consulting various entities which would be impacted by this puzzling bill. As far as i can tell, no local municipality or organization seems to object to Mr. Pons involvment with this marketing group and as a local hotelier he certainly is more than qualified to serve. If the reason for this bill is truly to be spiteful to one person or organizaion than I certainly will need to reconsider my support Mr. Norment who I have always felt has done a good job for our community. I eagerly await Mr. Norment's response to this puzzling legislation.
Quote
 
 
+12 #3 Guest 2011-01-26 12:50
I hope common sense prevails in Richmond and this bill is defeated. What concerns me is the idea that changes will be made to the bill but we won't be able to see them until after the vote.
Quote
 
 
+11 #2 Guest 2011-01-26 10:52
Norment filed a bill to prevent this? Did he file a bill when Zeidler was mayor while working for CW? Or while he was working for W&M a state supported school while writing law as a Virginia legislator???
Quote
 
 
+11 #1 Guest 2011-01-26 09:06
Thank you, Desiree, for your courage in reporting and printing what is factual. All too often reporters leave out the real substance of the interview if it goes against the bias of the newspaper or suggests something less than greatness from the anointed good old boys organizations.
Quote
 

Add comment

WYDaily invites you to join the community conversation. We expect civil discourse here. Personal attacks on others, indecent language and bad manners in general are unwelcome.


Security code
Refresh

Talk of the Town

Talk of the Town