LeftColumnBK

Smoked: Synthetic Marijuana Ban Clears House

spicedrugRICHMOND – When synthetic marijuana first hit Virginia stores in 2006, its use spread like wildfire among teenagers. Now, because of legislation moving toward approval in the General Assembly, the legality of the chemical-based substance may be going up in smoke.

Under House Bill 1434, which passed the House of Delegates by a 98-0 vote on Monday, Virginia would criminalize synthetic marijuana and classify it as a Schedule 1 drug, grouping it with marijuana (cannabis). The Senate unanimously approved a similar proposal last week.

Synthetic marijuana may look like the real thing and mimic tetrahydrocannabinol, the psychoactive ingredient in cannabis. But the substance is not structurally similar to THC. It is actually a concoction of herbs and spices sprayed with a synthetic compound.

“It is used as an alternative to an illegal drug in order to circumvent the laws of our land, our country, our commonwealth and our people,” said Delegate Scott Garrett, R-Lynchburg.

Garrett is a chief sponsor (along with fellow Republican Delegates Glenn Oder of Newport News and Todd Gilbert of Woodstock) of HB 1434. The measure was co-sponsored by 52 other delegates.

HB 1434 was among eight bills introduced in the House this legislative session targeting synthetic marijuana. Most of the other proposals were folded into HB 1434. Under the bill, possession of any quantity of synthetic marijuana would be a Class 1 misdemeanor, which can draw up to a year in jail and a $2,500 fine.

Advertised as “herbal incense,” synthetic marijuana is commonly sold under brand names such as “Spice” and “K2.” Thirteen states have outlawed the substance.

Such products are sold in gas stations, convenience stores and head shops throughout Virginia. There is no age limit for buyers.

Oder said synthetic marijuana is very dangerous. He said it has had “devastating effects on the users such as paranoia, anxiety, hallucinations, rapid heart beat and psychological disorders.”

In severe cases, synthetic marijuana can cause seizures, coma or even death, officials said.

Besides the legislation in the House, eight bills were filed in the Senate to criminalize such products. Most of them were incorporated into Senate Bill 745, sponsored by Sen. Mark Herring, D-Leesburg.

On Friday, the Senate passed SB 745 on a 37-0 vote.

The bill would classify possession of less than one-half ounce of synthetic marijuana as a Class 1 misdemeanor. Possession of one half-ounce to 5 pounds of the substance would be a Class 5 felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison.

Unlike HB 1434, the Senate bill would not classify synthetic marijuana as a Schedule 1 drug.

The two bills will effectively switch places on Wednesday after “crossover” at the General Assembly. That’s when the House considers legislation passed by the Senate and the Senate takes up legislation passed by the House.

Gov. Bob McDonnell has voiced support for outlawing synthetic marijuana. He said such legislation would “protect the health and safety of all Virginians.”

Comments  

 
+2 #8 Guest 2011-02-13 11:08
to Diksum:
You are obviously very passionate about your positions, but I'm puzzled.

You wrote back to Mike D:
"By your statement, no law can ever be modified to include new facts." I didn't find that in his brief paragraph. How did you come to interpret that?

You wrote back to OK:
"You must believe, then, that all laws are capricious. If so, then you are an outlaw." Again, how did you come to interpret that notation of his? Then, you called him "an outlaw" (earlier, you called someone "big-mouth").
My suggestion to you is to turn-off Faux News, leave Mommie's basement, and find beauty outdoors.
Patiently waiting your response ... ;-)
Quote
 
 
-4 #7 Guest 2011-02-11 11:46
Quoting OK:
Diksum, I wouldn't say this is a bad bill, but I feel I just have to point out to you that law and liberty are two wholly different animals: the source of law is government and is therefore capricious; liberty is a facet of our humanity and is the birthright of everyone.


Let me point out to you that law and liberty are not wholly different animals: we enjoy liberty because of laws that prevent the government from depriving us of it. And your statement that "the source of law is government and is therefore capricious" is inane.
You must believe, then, that all laws are capricious. If so, then you are an outlaw.
Quote
 
 
-5 #6 Guest 2011-02-11 11:37
Quoting Mike D:
Quoting Diksum:
Quoting Yorkie:
“protect the health and safety of all Virginians” ?

I'm glad our officials are concerned about our health. Now when are they going to stop being hypocritical and make the same statement about tobacco?
Rhetorical question, I know.

If I were a Tea-Party member, would I be against our government's infringement on my civil liberties? Something to ponder!



You mean your civil liberty to use illegal substances? So, Big Mouth, are you going to Richmond to campaign against this bill?

I don't like to use harsh words on here but this was a dumb statement.. it's not illegal.. they are trying to make it illegal.. thats what he means by infringement on civil liberties, making something that was once legal, illegal.. that seems obvious so I kinda feel condescending explaining it.


You say my statement is dumb - yours is asinine and, as you say, condescending.

By your statement, no law can ever be modified to include new facts. Do you really think that always making something that was once legal now illegal is infringing on our civil liberties? It could, but if the law is passed by a legal legislative body, that means they did not consider it as infringing on our civil liberties. Any such law can always be challenged. Laws are passed everyday making formerly legal activities now illegal. Wise up next time before you make a fool out of yourself with your poorly thought out comments.
Quote
 
 
+4 #5 Guest 2011-02-09 23:47
Quoting Diksum:
Quoting Yorkie:
“protect the health and safety of all Virginians” ?

I'm glad our officials are concerned about our health. Now when are they going to stop being hypocritical and make the same statement about tobacco?
Rhetorical question, I know.

If I were a Tea-Party member, would I be against our government's infringement on my civil liberties? Something to ponder!



You mean your civil liberty to use illegal substances? So, Big Mouth, are you going to Richmond to campaign against this bill?

I don't like to use harsh words on here but this was a dumb statement.. it's not illegal.. they are trying to make it illegal.. thats what he means by infringement on civil liberties, making something that was once legal, illegal.. that seems obvious so I kinda feel condescending explaining it.
Quote
 
 
+6 #4 Guest 2011-02-09 17:41
Diksum, I wouldn't say this is a bad bill, but I feel I just have to point out to you that law and liberty are two wholly different animals: the source of law is government and is therefore capricious; liberty is a facet of our humanity and is the birthright of everyone.
Quote
 
 
-12 #3 Guest 2011-02-09 14:29
Quoting Yorkie:
“protect the health and safety of all Virginians” ?

I'm glad our officials are concerned about our health. Now when are they going to stop being hypocritical and make the same statement about tobacco?
Rhetorical question, I know.

If I were a Tea-Party member, would I be against our government's infringement on my civil liberties? Something to ponder!



You mean your civil liberty to use illegal substances? So, Big Mouth, are you going to Richmond to campaign against this bill?
Quote
 
 
+7 #2 Guest 2011-02-09 13:40
They should either outlaw everything or nothing. Tobacco & alcohol kill more people that all other drugs put together but both are legal...because of the tax on them. So they should legalize it and tax it.
Quote
 
 
+9 #1 Guest 2011-02-09 09:56
“protect the health and safety of all Virginians” ?

I'm glad our officials are concerned about our health. Now when are they going to stop being hypocritical and make the same statement about tobacco?
Rhetorical question, I know.

If I were a Tea-Party member, would I be against our government's infringement on my civil liberties? Something to ponder!
Quote
 

Add comment

WYDaily invites you to join the community conversation. We expect civil discourse here. Personal attacks on others, indecent language and bad manners in general are unwelcome.


Security code
Refresh

Talk of the Town

Talk of the Town