LeftColumnBK

WJCC Superintendent to Present Budget Proposal Tuesday

The Williamsburg-James City County School Board will have its first peek at the superintendent’s proposed budget on Tuesday.

New Superintendent Steven Constantino’s proposal will be presented during a work session, starting at 7 p.m. Tuesday in the Stryker Building.

The proposed $110 million budget for 2011-2012 increased $675,550 over the current year’s budget, due to increases in state sales tax revenue and one-time money from the Federal Jobs Fund. The budget projects local contributions will return to levels not seen since 2009, with an increase of $1.4 million over the previous year.

While budgets are still tight for schools, they didn’t suffer quite as many blows in Gov. Bob McDonnell’s proposed budget amendments as they did last year. The biggest budget challenge this year is the loss of one-time Federal stimulus funds, but the division did receive $1.8 million from the Federal Jobs Fund.

In a letter to the School Board, Constantino and Assistant Superintendent for Administrative Services Scott Burckbuchler noted the budget proposal features several positives. The budget provides for 1 percent salary scale adjustments, a continuation of Virginia Retirement Services contributions for employees hired before July 1, 2010 and “largely keeps intact” longevity payments for faculty already receiving it, or eligible to receive it by September (read more about longevity pay here). The budget also includes additional local contributions due to an anticipated increase in sales tax revenue.

The continued VRS contributions will cost the division $1.8 million, while the 1 percent scale adjustment will cost $550,000.

The budget also maintains the division’s target student/teacher ratios of 22 students per teacher at the elementary level, 23 students per teacher at the middle school level and 25 students per teacher at the high school level. Special education positions initially funded with stimulus monies were also built into the operating budget. In addition, no cuts are recommended to athletics, summer school or extracurricular activities.

“We certainly face financial challenges ahead as one-time Federal revenue will disappear and we will need to restore funding for equipment, professional development, etc., but we can be confident in the fact that we continue to provide funding for our number one priority: teaching and learning,” Constantino wrote.

The proposal does not include funding for the Academy for Life and Learning, an alternative education school for struggling seventh- and eighth-graders. Since December, the school board has considered eliminating the program in favor of hiring one student advancement coach for each of the division’s three middle schools. That plan would achieve the board’s goal of potentially reaching more students than the 46 currently enrolled at ALL. It would also cost less money; ALL’s budget for this school year was $570,000 and the proposed budget for the student advancement coaches, plus program changes, is $300,000. The board has not officially voted to close ALL, but the board members have indicated they’ll approve the plan to create coaches instead.

Constantino’s budget was delivered to the board one month earlier this year than in the previous year, when the board received the superintendent’s proposal on March 15. Last year, the school division waited to see how its budget would be affected by decisions in the General Assembly, which gave the board less than a month to review the budget before its April 1 deadline to present to the City Council and the James City County Board of Supervisors for approval.

This year, the division started the process earlier by adopting a budget calendar on Sept. 18 and having its first budget discussion on Oct. 19. In March, the budget will be revised to reflect any actions by the General Assembly, and on March 1, the board will conduct a public hearing on the budget. The board expects to approve the budget on March 17, with adoption of the budget scheduled for May 17.

Comments  

 
+2 #5 Guest 2011-02-14 08:27
We have a $110 million budget and how much will be saved by closing ALL? $270K sounds like a drop in the bucket in the big scheme of things. I'm not a math whiz, but that sounds like 1/4 of 1%. The board has got to see that the mission of our system is to achieve the best outcomes for all students, not squeeze every penny out of every dollar.
Quote
 
 
+4 #4 Guest 2011-02-13 23:00
Is the board and the superintendent ever going to have an official decision on ALL? Simply removing the funding for the program from budget is an indicator of intentions, however, an official on the record yes or no is warranted for the families and teachers involved with the program.
Quote
 
 
+3 #3 Guest 2011-02-13 19:05
Well, hopefully the board will have the foresight to at least hire a couple of consultants to compare the outcomes of the children from ALL under the current system with how they do back at their home school with coaches. I would wager part of the reason these kids show such improvement at ALL is that they were able to get into an environment that worked for them.
Quote
 
 
+4 #2 Guest 2011-02-13 11:46
If ALL were to continue the need for trailers or and operate at 80 students then WJCC would not need $3.1 for expansion of middle schools or $1,4 for new trailers. The program is successsful in academic measures and will take pressure off overcrowding for a good number of years. Berkeley woudl need a cafeteria to handle any additonal students.
Quote
 
 
+4 #1 Guest 2011-02-13 09:12
Coaches instead of a real alternative school which is successful? I always thought that some kids just need a real alternative to regular school. Guess I was wrong. All kids learn best in the same environment. [No, I really don't think so!] I feel sorry for for the students, ALL teachers, and Mr. Mungin. They had a success going with no one in authority supporting their work. Just eliminate them from the budget. Now these ALL kids can sink or swim back in the big pond.
Quote
 

Add comment

WYDaily invites you to join the community conversation. We expect civil discourse here. Personal attacks on others, indecent language and bad manners in general are unwelcome.


Security code
Refresh

Talk of the Town

Talk of the Town