LeftColumnBK

Williamsburg Speaks Out Against Proposed State Senate District Changes

Williamsburg Mayor Clyde Haulman is speaking out against the new redistricting plan for state Senate districts, which splits the city for the first time and could cost the city thousands of dollars.

The General Assembly recently passed House and Senate redistricting maps, which are waiting for Governor Bob McDonnell’s approval. The city, which has historically not been divided, is proposed to be split between two Senate Districts – Sen. Tommy Norment’s 3rd District and Sen. John Miller’s 1st District (view the proposed maps on the state’s redistricting page and select ‘senate’ as the district type, then select HB5001).

Wednesday afternoon, Haulman wrote a letter asking McDonnell not to split the city. It will arbitrarily divide the city, create an unnecessary expense and will confuse voters, the Mayor said.

The city is small, and therefore is a community of interest, according to Haulman. The Senate plan “entirely discounts Williamsburg’s corporate identity by splitting the city for the sake of political expedience, creating arbitrary and in this case nonsensical political boundaries through the geographic heart” of the city.

Williamsburg is getting ready to change its voting precinct boundaries, and Haulman says this combined with the proposed Senate district changes would result in members of one precinct voting for two different senatorial candidates.

This means the city would need to create a third precinct, which entails buying new voting machines and will set the city back an estimated $16,000 the first year and increase overall operating costs in the future.

“This is an unnecessary expense for the citizens of the City of Williamsburg,” the Mayor said in his letter. “Simply based on population and number of registered voters, a third precinct is not required for a community the size of Williamsburg.”

The split will also confuse citizens, who will have a sense of being a cohesive community in all other areas of state and local government but will have two different Senators in the General Assembly.

Governor McDonnell has a week from when the plan reaches his desk to decide whether to sign, amend or veto it. Follow the process on the Virginia Public Access Project page.

Comments  

 
+3 #9 Guest 2011-04-14 15:28
I have never needed my Senator to do anything for me. Since Sen. Miller isn't my representative, I cannot comment on what he's done for his district, but if he becomes my State Senator here in James City, I would hope that he always maintains a high level of civility and dignity as a "Virginia State Senator" that obviously Sen. Norment does not believe in maintaining. I believe the English used to refer to it as being a "Gentleman".
Quote
 
 
+4 #8 Guest 2011-04-14 15:18
You seem to be forgetting one thing about the article above that "Ugly Norment" references, Sen. Miller NEVER questioned "What Sen. Norment has done for his district or, as a whole, as a member of the State Senate." It was Norment who threw these personal attacks at Miller and opened up the door to debate his own behavior and arrogance. The newspaper articles make it sound as if Norment is a spoiled brat who doesn't want to play by the rules if it means he loses. I read an article that also said that 10 years ago when Norment was the Senate Majority Leader, his party did the same thing during that re-districting. Personally, I think politics is a dirty profession full of people who are willing to sell their soul to the devil for a buck.
Quote
 
 
+5 #7 Guest 2011-04-14 12:54
To Les -
The point of my post was to try and keep the argument centered on the article. Williamsburg needs to be kept whole. I don't think splitting it helps or hurts either candidate.
I am neutral on Norment.


Q: What has Miller ever done for you?
A: The same thing he's done for his constituents in the 1st District: NOTHING!
Quote
 
 
+6 #6 Guest 2011-04-14 10:46
I agree with the reader about u gly Norment.He is rude and he showed his true color.If it doesn't go his way he is going to take him marbles and go home.John Miller is a gentleman
Quote
 
 
-5 #5 Guest 2011-04-14 10:45
To: KBAR, Ugly Norment and Whitley:
Q: What has Miller ever done for you?
A: The same thing he's done for his constituents in the 1st District: NOTHING!
Quote
 
 
+6 #4 Guest 2011-04-14 09:23
Thank you, Mayor Haulman!
Your insightful assessment and level guidance provide excellent leadership for our great city. Maintaining Williamsburg as a whole is the correct decision.
Speaking of your leadership abilities, I take this moment to congratulate you for being selected to receive the Prentis Award from W&M!

Shoud there be any changes, at all, it should be the change of name of the Berkeley precinct to one less confusing with the JCC Berkeley districts.

>>

To UGLY NORMENT: Thank you!!! Want a massive dose of Norment's Rant/Rave? He's the speaker at the Gazebo, Friday at Noon. Take a shovel and an airline bag.
Quote
 
 
+8 #3 Guest 2011-04-14 07:40
I'm appalled that Sen. Tommy Norment has resulted in personal attacks on another Senator, regardless of who he/she is. Calling Sen. Miller ineffective is mean-spirited and just shows how desperate Norment is to keep his power base and cash cow. This exchange also points out the biggest flaw in our political system. Politicians would actually threaten to sell their family home and move into another district just to run for election to keep their "part-time job". That part-time state job as a member of the General Assembly must be worth alot more than the small salary (approx. $21K) it generates. Obviously, Sen. Norment gets some large perks representing organizations like Va. Power, Colonial Williamsburg and the College of William & Mary to actually uproot his family from one home to another just for a part-time job. I have an idea, how about Sen. Norment actually try and be an attorney for his primary source of living instead of winking at his special interests to hand out more perks when they need his vote. This just DISGUSTS me!!
Quote
 
 
+10 #2 Guest 2011-04-14 07:30
To Vote Norment Out

Your sentiment can still be maintained without splitting the tiny Williamsburg electoral base.
Quote
 
 
+3 #1 Guest 2011-04-13 19:41
Any redistricting plan to diiminish Norment's political involvement or get him voted out entirely is most welcome. Norment has become a sell out and votes consistently against the best interests of the vast majority of his constituents. Time to vote Norment into retirement and out of office.
Quote
 

Add comment

WYDaily invites you to join the community conversation. We expect civil discourse here. Personal attacks on others, indecent language and bad manners in general are unwelcome.


Security code
Refresh

Talk of the Town

Talk of the Town