LeftColumnBK

Report Examines State Agencies' Cell Phone Usage

RICHMOND – With electronic communication becoming an essential need in both the personal and business worlds, it’s no surprise why the GEICO Caveman advertisement of a Neanderthal using technology in a modern setting became so popular.

Cellphones are king in electronic and digital communication. Like businesses, government agencies – including colleges and universities – often provide employees cellphones and coverage plans to improve productivity. But such technology carries a price: more than $6 million a year.

That’s how much the Commonwealth of Virginia spends on the more than 11,000 cellphones it provides to state government employees, according to a recent study by Walter Kucharski, the state auditor of public accounts.

Want to know more?

To view the complete list of 134 agencies reviewed by the state auditor, click here. To read the report by Walter Kucharski, the state auditor of public accounts, click here.

He said the state may be wasting a chunk of that money: Virginia spent almost $1 million on unused wireless phones from July through December of 2009.

“The Commonwealth averaged 4,514 phones with zero minutes per month totaling over $962,487 in the six months reviewed, while averaging $160,414 per month,” the audit said.

“A phone with zero minutes is not necessarily wasteful because the agency may use the phone for emergencies. However, state agencies should periodically review employee cellphone usage to determine if there is a continuing need for the employee to have the cellphone. As part of the review, agencies should eliminate phones for employees whose use does not justify having a phone. Eliminating unnecessary phones will result in direct cost savings for agencies.”

Kucharski’s investigators examined the cellphone records for 134 state agencies, including public universities. The Virginia Department of Transportation had the most cellphones (2,336), followed by the Department of Corrections (1,210), the Virginia State Police (919) and the Virginia Department of Health (851).

Then, at No. 5, came Virginia Commonwealth University, with 419 cellphones. That was far more than any other school studied, such as Virginia Tech (362), Old Dominion University (223), Longwood University (81) and James Madison University (58), the report said.

VCU’s 419 cellphones resulted in a bill of $166,221 during the last half of 2009. In contrast, George Mason University averaged 27 phones a month and had a bill of $11,934 for those six months, according to the study.

Auditors found that 126 of VCU’s cellphones had zero minutes.

Robin Roane, director of telecommunications services at VCU, said there’s a reasonable explanation why phones may be unused: Those devices are for emergencies, especially at the VCU Medical Center.

“As far as phones being left in the box, that is what those phones were purchased for,” Roane said. “They were purchased as part of our disaster recovery emergency plan. Say something was to happen at the hospital and they couldn’t use the phones in that building. They could use the cellphones in the boxes that haven’t been used. That’s what they were purchased for in the first place.”

Most of VCU’s cellphones are in use, and they are being utilized both effectively and economically, according to Christopher Brown, a support technician with the Division of Student Affairs and Enrollment Services.

The VCU Department of Residential Life and Housing issues cellphones only to full-time employees who are part of the emergency staff and to key administrators.

“Most of the time, the cellphones are used heavily, and anything with the BlackBerrys is issued to the proper people,” Brown said. “It’s a good investment because, say, for instance that a few housing managers had an issue with a dorm: If they didn’t have their phones on direct connect, they wouldn’t have been able to contact people immediately and solve problems as efficiently.”

By VCU policy, university employees cannot use their state-provided cellphone for personal business. And there could be liability issues if VCU employees use their personal cellphones for university business, Brown said.

VCU faculty and staff members must undergo an extensive request process to receive a cellular device from the university. They must get approval from their department head and then from a dean or vice president. Only then does the VCU Telecommunications Department issue a phone.

Kucharski’s report said state government as a whole could do a better job of managing cellphones and controlling costs.

“The point of the study was to show that different departments in the state had a lot of different plans and that there was no way to determine who should get what kind of cellphone and what kind of plan they should be under,” Kucharski said.

“We had people buying plans with a fixed number of minutes and had unused minutes that kept rolling forward. And then there were people who ended up having to pay extra because they exceeded minutes. So there was a host of different issues.”

Comments  

 
0 #4 Guest 2011-05-23 16:13
Most state employees use their personal cell phones and blackberry devices for job use. As a general rule, state benefits. MOst employees do this willingly not expecting any type of reimbusrement. Government employees are conscious of costs and difficult times all taxpayers are experiencing.
Quote
 
 
0 #3 Guest 2011-05-16 18:41
The Commonwealth could use some better advice when is comes to "emergency" cell phones. It would be far cheaper to have phones such as Sprint's Common Cents Mobile plan. It's $150 per year and includes 2,142 minutes. I switched my parents to this plan because Verizon was gouging them for minutes they did not need. ARE YOU LISTENING VIRGINIA? It's also irresponsible for the Wireless companies to take advantage of the agencies. Robin Roane, director of telecommunicati ons services should know better.
Quote
 
 
0 #2 Guest 2011-05-16 07:06
In general in business individuals are using their personal mobile phones for personal and business functions and being reimbursed for business usage versus the business paying for the complete service. This has evolved over time as the mobile phone has increasingly become the norm.

Why is the state not looking at doing what most other businesses are doing? This would save all taxpayers some significant "chi-ching."
Quote
 
 
+4 #1 Guest 2011-05-15 11:24
In some instances, cell phones are being used to replace aging Paging services.
SMS (Short Message Service, or "texting" capable cell phones can be a cost effective replacement for a simple pager. SMS usage does not use "minutes" on a cell phone plan. A pager can cost from $8.09/month to as much as $22/month on state contract, whereas a cell phone w/SMS can cost as little as $8.73/month. Cellular service coverage has exceeded paging service coverage, which is diminishing year-by-year. Within a few years pager users will be forced to change-over to cellular, which is already a more viable and cost competitive solution for the communication needs of of the Commonwealth.
Quote
 

Add comment

WYDaily invites you to join the community conversation. We expect civil discourse here. Personal attacks on others, indecent language and bad manners in general are unwelcome.


Security code
Refresh

Talk of the Town

Talk of the Town