LeftColumnBK

York Schools Opts Out of Performance Pay Initiative

York County will not pursue a performance pay incentive offered for schools deemed hard-to-staff by the state.

In April, York River Academy was included on a list of 57 schools invited to participate in Gov. Bob McDonnell’s new performance pay incentive, which provides $3 million in state funding to reward teachers who choose to work in schools that have trouble retaining staff. To receive the funding, the schools would have to earn exemplary ratings in the next school year.

At a School Board work session Monday, Chief Academic Officer Stephanie Guy said the window of opportunity to prepare an application was too narrow. To receive the competitive grant funding, York River Academy would have to implement a comprehensive teacher-evaluation system that matched performance standards and model evaluation systems approved by the state Board of Education. In addition, at least 40 percent of teacher evaluations must be based on student academic growth.

Completed applications are due on Wednesday, and award amounts will be announced during the summer. Superintendent Eric Williams said other superintendents in the region decided not to apply, also citing the time crunch.

YRA was the only school in the Historic Triangle that met the criteria to apply for initiative funding. The criteria were related to accreditation, average attendance, percentage of students in special education, percentage of limited-English proficient students, percentage of teachers with provisional licenses, percentage of special education teachers with provisional licenses, percentage of first-year teachers and the number of first-year teachers in a critical-shortage area.

YRA is a 9th-12th grade charter school that gives students a chance to earn professional technical certifications, such as Computer Repair Certification or Certified Internet Webmaster, before graduating. To enter the school, students must have an interest in a career in the computer technology industry, and have a history of absenteeism and performing below grade level.

 

Comments  

 
+1 #8 Guest 2011-06-15 11:07
altough not a fan of tenure, one of the reasons for its existence is so that a teacher can speak freely and have a dissenting opinion from administration and even from their peers. Tenure does play a positive role, however it is also being abused when helping to retain ineffective and even bad teachers.
Quote
 
 
+7 #7 Guest 2011-06-14 14:49
My children can tell you which teachers are good and which are bad. My students can tell you which teachers are good and which are bad. I can tell you which of my colleagues are good teachers and which are bad. The principals know.
Quote
 
 
+6 #6 Guest 2011-06-14 13:18
If we're going to pay teachers based on performance, then it's only fair to give teachers a role in determining who gets into their classes. Why should teachers be penalized for kids who are disruptive or uninterested. Let the teachers weed out the troublemakers.
Quote
 
 
+4 #5 Guest 2011-06-14 11:06
To Hopley Yeaton:

How, specifically, would you measure teachers who are "the best" and "those who are not doing the job?"

How, specifically, would you reward the "best?"

In your response, please address how your system would work given the vast variety of students and their background socio-economic conditions that different teachers endeavor to work with.

Thanks Mr Yeaton!
Quote
 
 
-1 #4 Guest 2011-06-14 09:38
It is unfortunate that this policy of paying teachers based on their degrees and longevity rather than their ability persists. It breeds mediocrity. The best way to implement a merit pay program for teachers is to first eliminate tenure. Then, reward the best with good salary increases and terminate those who are not doing the job.
Quote
 
 
+2 #3 Guest 2011-06-14 08:41
'Taxpayer" might want to "steel" some writing lessons and "benifit" from that.
Quote
 
 
+10 #2 Guest 2011-06-14 08:38
"Taxpayer" has very eloquently demonstrated the result of poor teaching. It is very sad when people misspell words such as "benifiting", "garding" and "steeling", as well as forget commas ("Yes why would teachers...") and use sentence fragments ("BUT not as a teacher...") in their (be sure to use the proper form of "their") writing. How brave of Taxpayer to admit these shortcomings to make a point. Thank you, "Taxpayer"!
Quote
 
 
-10 #1 Guest 2011-06-14 07:17
Yes why would teachers want to have their pay based on their teaching ability when most of the teachers are the students on the low end of the garding scale. Why would you want to give up free money for nothing over something that you actually had to earn. If they were in the private sector and could not do their jobs they would be fired. BUT not as a teacher they just keep steeling our tax dollars to reward them. The 2 groups that are NOT benifiting from this theft are the students and the the people that they are stealing from.
Quote
 

Add comment

WYDaily invites you to join the community conversation. We expect civil discourse here. Personal attacks on others, indecent language and bad manners in general are unwelcome.


Security code
Refresh

Talk of the Town

Talk of the Town