LeftColumnBK

County Redisticting Plan Gets DOJ Pre-Clearance

Despite efforts by four citizens to stop the process based on allegations of adverse effects on minorities, the Department of Justice has pre-cleared James City County’s redistricting plan, which goes into effect immediately.

The county submitted its redistricting plan at the end of April. Four citizens challenged the plan because they argued it diluted minority voting strength, and they asked the Department of Justice to stop the county from implementing the plan (read previous stories here and here). Representatives of the DOJ spoke to various county officials and citizens, and let the county know this week that its redistricting plan has received pre-clearance.

"This news confirms the excellent work done by the members of the Citizens Advisory Committee, who have had to endure unwarranted and unfair criticism," said Board of Supervisors Chairman Mary Jones. "It also confirms that the judgment of the Board's majority was sound in approving this plan, and that the complaints of those opposed to it were unfounded."

According to a press release issued by the county registrar Friday, the plan, which goes into effect immediately, will affect over 85 percent of County voters through changes to either state Senate districts, state House of Delegates districts, local election districts or polling places.

Residents can view adjusted precinct and polling place information online.

Since part of the County has been redrawn into the 1st State Senate District, voters associated with the following adjusted precincts will vote on Tuesday, Aug. 23 in the Republican Party Primary Election: Berkeley A at Jamestown High School; Berkeley B at Clara Byrd Baker Elementary School; Berkeley C at Matoaka Elementary School; Jamestown C at Greensprings Chapel; Jamestown D at James City/Williamsburg Community Center; Powhatan A at Hornsby Middle School; Powhatan C at Toano Middle School; Stonehouse A at Crosswalk Community Church; Stonehouse B at Norge Elementary School; Stonehouse C at Stonehouse Elementary School; Roberts B at Mt. Gilead Baptist Church; and Roberts D at Rawls Byrd Elementary School.

Residents associated with the following adjusted precincts will not be voting and the associated polling places will not be open for voting: Jamestown A at Legacy Hall; Jamestown B at James City/Williamsburg Community Center; Powhatan B at Lafayette High School; Powhatan D at Warhill High School; Roberts A at James River Elementary School; Roberts C at Grace Baptist Church.

New Virginia Voter Identification Cards for voters in the 3rd State Senate District will be mailed during the first week of August.

Voter ID cards for all other affected voters will be mailed at a later date but before their next election. Residents can verify that a current residence address is on file with the Voter Registrar by calling 253-6868.

Comments  

 
-3 #5 Guest 2011-06-26 23:04
Pre-clearance was recieved by JCC after several corrections and additional informaton was provided to DOJ. The error would have not been sighted if not for the complaint.

The citizen committee was not the target of the complaint rather the flawed process adopted by the Board and the misinformation provide by Board and staff to DOJ and the community.

If you are a registerd voter be sure that you get two notices of the new polling places by October. If you do not then you may not be on the registered voter list on election day. Call the registar office today. The number appears above.
Quote
 
 
+7 #4 Guest 2011-06-25 19:18
"Voice of Reason" (dare we guess, one of the 4 members who complained to DOJ), I'm pretty sure pre-clearance doesn't have to do solely with a "typographical error", as you claim. The Department of Justice is charged with approving the maps to ensure that a redistricting map does not either have the intentional purpose or the unintention effect of diluting minority voting strength. The Department of Justice found that the proposed map (now law) does not do so. How you can claim a typographical error as the sole reason that the county received federal pre-clearance is beyond me.
Quote
 
 
0 #3 Guest 2011-06-25 16:51
Quoting Patriot:
DOJ pre-approval and ultimate approval should come a no surprise to anyone especially Dave Jarman, Edith Heard, Mary Minor and Deborah Katzek -Kratter. These partisans and those that appointed and supported them should be ashamed of the way they unecessarily politicized the re-districting process. Citizens will remember that it was Republicans who stood up to protect them with fair, logical and compact voting districts.


You're right Patriot #1, the Board of Supervisors' decision to ratify the recommendation of the heavily partisan "Citizens' Advisory
Committee, and the error that stood when it was is another example of how the word of those in favor with those in office, is not questioned. That is the bitter truth about the current functioning of all levels of government, and those with considerable wealth now.

The advantage taken by officials, of those whose lives have been threatened and/or destroyed is infuriating for those who suffer prejudice and lack of normal brain function (idiots). I just saw a Judge in JCC/Williamsbur g court on Friday order the release to it's owner, an unjustifiably impounded car. The Sheriff's officers who stood in that courtroom have refused to release it until the Judge's decision reaches them in writing, on Monday. The car's owner called ahead of time to ask those diligent protectors of society if there could be any reason it wouldn't be released that day, if the Judge reached that favorable decision. The answer to that was "no". Yet a car which is the only means of transportation for a senior community member remains unavailable for her use, after it had been taken 3 weeks ago.

Now if it had been the release of someone of imposing position who
was erroneously imprisoned for a " white"collar crime, would taxpayers be expected to pay for 3 additional days of incarceration?

Life isn't fair....... we know that from childhood - yet does that have to be rubbed in, as it so often is? I'm sick of bullies at all stages of life who enjoy forcing their will on unfortunate others, no matter the reason. A deserted island seems really good to me right now.

I suppose we taxpayers would
Quote
 
 
+3 #2 Guest 2011-06-25 08:45
"Patriot" ( dare we guess, Mr. Ryer?) may not have really read the letter to the DOJ - or he would understand that the reason for the pre-clearance relates more to the typographical error made by the county than to anything else. The DOJ did not vindicate the process, or in any way suggest that it was fair. It merely means that because there was less dilution of minority voting power than the county originally thought - the plan was not illegal. It still stinks - but it's not illegal!
Quote
 
 
-6 #1 Guest 2011-06-24 18:46
DOJ pre-approval and ultimate approval should come a no surprise to anyone especially Dave Jarman, Edith Heard, Mary Minor and Deborah Katzek -Kratter. These partisans and those that appointed and supported them should be ashamed of the way they unecessarily politicized the re-districting process. Citizens will remember that it was Republicans who stood up to protect them with fair, logical and compact voting districts.
Quote
 

Add comment

WYDaily invites you to join the community conversation. We expect civil discourse here. Personal attacks on others, indecent language and bad manners in general are unwelcome.


Security code
Refresh

Talk of the Town

Talk of the Town