LeftColumnBK

JCC Will Look at All of County's Memberships, Not Just Environmental One

The James City County Board of Supervisors agreed to evaluate the county’s membership in professional organizations at their board meeting this week.

This comes after Board of Supervisors Chairman Mary Jones’ initial suggestion that James City to longer be a part of International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives, or ICLEI, at the June 14 board meeting. She again requested to end the membership to ICLEI on Tuesday.

The county pays $1,200 a year for membership to ICLEI. The primary benefit of membership is the use of ICLEI software and protocol to conduct a baseline greenhouse gas inventory. ICLEI staff also gives technical assistance.

James City's memberships

The county is currently vetting a comprehensive list of all memberships in organizations along with subscriptions each department has. County spokeswoman Jody Puckett said departments are looking for duplicates or incorrect information.

Puckett said there are about 105 professional memberships and support organizations used by county staff and constitutional (elected) officers.

The support memberships are used for support, training, networking and certifications, she said.

Jones and Supervisor Bruce Goodson spoke in favor of cancelling the ICLEI membership, while Supervisors John McGlennon and James Kennedy asked to review all county affiliations before making a decision. Supervisor James Icenhour did not comment on the matter.

Six residents spoke during the public comment session Tuesday in favor of ending the county’s involvement with ICLEI. They railed against the United Nations, ICLEI and Agenda 21, which is a plan of action set forth by the U.N. to address the impact of humanity on the environment.

“This, as a young father, is terrifying to me,” said resident Keith Sadler, after reading some proposals and outlines from ICLEI. “This is nothing more than a global attempt at circumventing the rights guaranteed by our Founding Fathers.”

Jones said a few times that she had heard similar concerns from citizens, like the ones that were raised in the public comment period. She said that she had been conducting her own research on ICLEI. She quoted information from a 1997 interview with a former secretary general of ICLEI (which can be found here).

ICLEI is now a hot-button issue among Tea Party activists, as many affiliated websites have articles discussing the issue. In a later phone interview, Jones would not say if she was a member of any Tea Party organization, but did explain why the ICLEI membership issue is so important to her.

“It was brought specifically to my attention by concerned residents,” said Jones. “I certainly support the goals of the citizens who are involved with the Tea Party. I support fiscal responsibility."

McGlennon mentioned at a previous board meeting that anti-ICLEI literature was distributed at a Tea Party meeting that he attended along with Jones. McGlennon, again voiced his concern with leaving ICLEI, which he said suffers from a “misunderstanding of its role.”

“My sense is that this is an organization that is being considered differently, and that it’s not really that we are getting the benefit and knowledge, but maybe something else that’s driving this consideration,” said McGlennon.

“I think there is a lot of misinformation about ICLEI that has been distributed. We received [an email] from the national organization today that explains a little bit more about what they do. And when you sit down and read that information, ICLEI looks a lot like a number of other organizations that we’ve been involved with through the years.”

McGlennon responded to some of the concerns brought up by the residents, by pointing out that it was the board that supported the Economic Opportunity (EO) zone and got behind the comprehensive plan. The EO zone is planned to be a mixed-use development area, which will feature both housing and commercial space. The zone will allow for multi-level apartment complexes, which one resident claimed was among the goals of ICLEI. One of the main objectives of the county’s comprehensive plan is sustainability, another focus of ICLEI.

“I’m having a hard time understanding exactly what it is that people are objecting to,” said McGlennon.

Kennedy said he also felt that ICLEI was being singled out, considering that the county is affiliated with many professional organizations.

“I don’t want to single out organizations for one issue,” said Kennedy. “And that’s what concerns me. We have to look at this thing objectively, Chairman Jones. I have many concerns about this organization, but I have many concerns of many other organizations that we’re members of as well.”

Kennedy also shared that he recently spoke to Patrick Hays, who is the mayor of North Little Rock, Ark., and a member of the ICLEI board of directors. Kennedy said that he pointed many things out to Hays about ICLEI, including that that there are no present or past ICLEI board members who are Republicans.

Kennedy said he would not want to approve or cancel a membership to an organization without hearing both sides of the argument first.

“We talk about these items, then if a speech is given, then the impression is given that we’re eliminating something and we haven’t discussed it in detail,” said Kennedy. “I hate to say this, but a lot of things that you read on the Internet are not true. This is no attack on you Ms. Jones — this is just a request to get all the information in and make some decisions.”

Comments  

 
0 #13 Guest 2011-09-06 00:18
United Nations UN Agenda 21 is a worldwide plan being implemented locally by ICLEI in over 600 membership cities and counties in the U.S. Everyone should read the document that is the plan for the 21st century. 179 nations, including ours signed onto it in 1992. This plan is inconsistent with our Constitution in many ways but one of the primary ways is concerning private property rights. The plan is opposed to private property ownership period. It also gives animals equal rights with humans, no kidding. Individual rights are not protected and wealth redistribution is called for. They call this social equity. Google UN Agenda 21 and you will find extensive information on the subject. I recommend FreedomAdvocate s.Org and DemocratsAgains tUNAgenda21. Membership in the ICLEI organization is unconstitutiona l and their meetings are closed to the public. Kick ICLEI Out of your cities and counties if you care about the future of our nation.
Quote
 
 
-5 #12 Guest 2011-07-18 21:13
Juliet, I can honestly say to you that I have never met a fiscally conservative democrat. Socially conservative,,, ,,perhaps. I can think of a few friends that could be socially conservative and democrat....but never fiscally......
Quote
 
 
-9 #11 Guest 2011-07-18 14:23
How can you be a social and fiscal conservative and still be a demorat? That is like saying Hitler just hurt a few people, or Stalin just smacked a couple of people, or better yet MAO was a good Christian church goer. Yeah right....
Quote
 
 
-8 #10 Guest 2011-07-18 13:56
If she was for it, BEFORE she was against it...then voting for her be voting against it too, right!?

Quoting Also...quoting Foxworthy:
Here's your sign...which yard sign would you prefer, one for Mr Fraley or Chairman Jones? One of each probably...welc ome aboard!
Quote
 
 
-5 #9 Guest 2011-07-18 13:47
Please answer three simple questions:

1. What is the nefarious TeaPartyAgenda?
2. When did Chairman Jones every state she was against fiscal responsibility, honesty, accountability or the Constitution?
3. it's been 5 weeks now and the closest thing to an answer to the simple question she posed representing the citizens concerns is "Maybe JCC benefits from a spreadsheet"... that isn't complete yet

Where is the intellectual honesty regarding this topic - not the petulant projection to whether or not Dr McGlennon is a member of a Tea Party or not.
Quote
 
 
-3 #8 Guest 2011-07-18 09:24
Hi Julie Wagon - (I like your first name) but there is such a thing as a social conservative Democrat and fiscal conservative Democrat.
Again - I ask that we NOT go partisan, that we just discuss the issue and how it fits within our community. and I sincerely hope we exit ICLEI as soon as possible.
Quote
 
 
+4 #7 Guest 2011-07-18 08:32
"Jones would not say if she was a member of any Tea Party organization? “I certainly support the goals of the citizens who are involved with the Tea Party." Hey Berkeley voters, this is Washington D.C. way of saying " I was for it BEFORE I was against it. A vote for Mary Jones is a vote for the Tea Party agenda.
Quote
 
 
+1 #6 Guest 2011-07-18 07:30
it is a partisan thing,,,,you won't find a true social or fiscal conservative supporting this. Sorry, it is what it is Juliet.
Quote
 
 
0 #5 Guest 2011-07-17 21:10
I don't see why we need any memberships to any organizations. I don't think our tax dollars should be spent so that the county can be in these groups.

I saw cancel them all, and if they are really necessary than citizens or the supervisors will fight to get back in. Remember it's our money that pays for this.
Quote
 
 
-4 #4 Guest 2011-07-17 18:02
No counties in this country would belong to ICLEI if they knew what the purpose of the office really is. They disguise themselves as a sustainable initiative and propmote "all things good" when they really are trying to take personal property rights away from residents. Call the exterminator and extinguish that group as well as others that will surface as a result of this.
Quote
 

Add comment

WYDaily invites you to join the community conversation. We expect civil discourse here. Personal attacks on others, indecent language and bad manners in general are unwelcome.


Security code
Refresh

Talk of the Town

Talk of the Town