LeftColumnBK

Summer Lodging Numbers Don't Look Good

The summer season was pretty poor for Triangle tourism based on hotel industry data.

The summer months were not good for local hoteliers, who saw occupancy rates significantly lower compared to the same months last year, which wasn’t a good year, either. Local industry experts cite a poor consumer confidence and Hurricane Irene as key factors for the poor performance. In the city of Williamsburg, City Manager Jack Tuttle suggests aging hotel properties are weighing on city revenues.

Based on numbers provided by industry analysts from Smith Travel Research, June hotel occupancy in the Triangle was 53.2 percent, down 4.4 percent over 2010. The revenue per available room (RevPAR), a key metric for the industry, was down 14.1 percent. In July, occupancy was 63.1 percent, down 12 percent over last year while RevPAR was down 9.5 percent. In August, occupancy was 59 percent, down 11.7 percent. RevPAR was down 11.9 percent.

The summer months are the most important of the year for businesses that rely on tourism in the Triangle. Hoteliers have long said their target for acceptable occupancy over a year is about 58 percent; the average occupancy so far this year through August is 42.2 percent.

Regarding the Smith Travel data, Hotel Motel Association President Billy Scruggs says the still-depressed economy likely was a big factor in the low occupancy numbers. “Consumer confidence is still down,” Scruggs says. “This makes us most anxious, especially when we see destinations similar to us not in similar territory. Virginia Beach continues to do well.”

Greater Williamsburg Chamber and Tourism Alliance Vice President for Tourism Bob Harris agrees that low consumer confidence is affecting visitation to the Triangle. “In July and August, consumer confidence tanked,” Harris says, citing the Consumer Confidence Index, which sank from 59.2 in July to 44.5 in August, its lowest level in more than two years. “We want 90 to 95 percent consumer confidence levels,” he says. “That’s when we see our spikes [in visitation].”

As for Virginia Beach consistently outperforming the Williamsburg area, Harris says this is because Virginia Beach has a strong corporate travel market, as opposed to Williamsburg, “which is dependent on leisure travel business.”

Harris points to Branson, Mo., and Pigeon Forge, Tenn., as comparable markets that rely mainly on leisure business, and both are also struggling, he says.

As for whether the hotel industry has come to a breaking point yet after years of low occupancy, Scruggs says he doubts developers will want to come in and build new properties now. “Hotels won’t get built unless there is occupancy in the upper 60s or upper 70s.” So far this year, occupancy in Williamsburg is at 42.2 percent. Occupancy rates started dropping off after 9/11 and never really recovered, he feels.

Scruggs says he is aware of “a number” of hotels that are underwater and are now owned and operated by note-holding banks.

Williamsburg was up 4.27 percent in room tax revenue in June compared to 2010, and July showed a decline of less than one percent, seemingly at odds with Smith Travel data. Williamsburg City Manager Jack Tuttle suggests that the increase in city room revenue collections in June likely means Colonial Williamsburg hotel properties fared well in that month, and also in July. CW has just over 900 rooms available, and does not share its information with Smith Travel.

Some Hotel Data Facts

Smith Travel lists 98 properties in the Williamsburg market (this includes hotels that don’t share occupancy information), with a total of 9305 rooms.

Colonial Williamsburg’s four main lodging facilities, a total of 933 rooms, do not report occupancy numbers.

Great Wolf Lodge (in York County), with 405 rooms, does not report to Smith Travel, either.

Kingsmill Resort (In James City County) does report its occupancy.

The city room revenues still aren’t up to 2008 and 2009 levels, though. According to Tuttle, the city had the “first wave of hotel product” built in the area, some properties dating from the 1950s and 1960s. These properties “don’t meet today’s travel standards... The market has changed, and now there’s too much product [in the city] that doesn’t fit the [market’s] needs.” For instance, many school groups visiting cannot have outside room access (versus inside hallway access) due to safety standards, which eliminates many older hotels, Tuttle explains.

The city is working on redeveloping areas with these older hotels, he says, but redevelopment takes time and funding.

All the experts WYDaily spoke with agree that Hurricane Irene (which hit in late August) was bad for the tourism industry, even though local government revenue data isn’t available for that month yet. The storm caused long-term power outages in the area, and also affected the ability for others to travel outside storm-ravaged locales.

“We knew we’d take a hit from Irene,” says Scruggs, “not just over that weekend but residually. We lost people who wanted to travel after the storm and didn’t, or couldn’t. Hoteliers already felt August was a little soft to start with.”

 

Comments  

 
+1 #15 Just a thought 2011-09-30 08:35
To: Not Surprised & Burger:
I opened a sandwich shop a few years ago, but I don't go around saying the answer to my low sales is to shut down half of the other sandwich shops in the area to boost my traffic. NO, the answer is to increase the tourist count (ie, demand) to the area. Does the old saying, "Rising tides raises all ships" or something like that ring a bell. If your theory is the answer, then we should recommend that we need to shut down other historical and amusement parks to boost our share of the pie. IT DOESN"T WORK THAT WAY IN THIS COUNTRY!!! Competition is good. It weeds out the poorly run entities and rewards those entities that are constantly changing and are creative in their thinking. We need the local govts to work closely with the attractions to push them to be more creative in their marketing. And, yes, CW needs new thinking. It is still doing the same old same old every year and they expect a different result. I think that is the definition of insanity according to Einstein. Busch Gardens is doing the right thing by adding more exciting rides and marketing their new additions. The real question is whether CW really wants more tourists of the kind that have screaming kids and tight budgets (Sorry no donations from this group). This is the group that made Williamsburg in the past and goes hand in hand with what Busch Gardens attracts. Not everybody is a Rockafeller!! And please save the reasoning that "if it wasn't for CW, then none of us small business owners would be here". The same applies to CW, if it wasnt for the Rockafellers, they wouldnt be here either. We all need to be considered partners in this area. We all serve a purpose. Do you think CW or Busch could do the numbers they do, without the hotels and restaurants outside their properties. NO!!
As far as there being too many hotels.......we ll lets see what we should do about it. How about the govt raising the real estate tax rate on every citizen to buy up all the old properties and level them. Sounds good? Right? Except it would never fly with anyone. You can't take a bulldozer to these big buildings. As long as the current owners can hang on to them they will in hopes of better days. The Answer is to lift the demand for the area's offerings which then will give the funds to the property owners to re-invest or re-build or re-develop. With the tourism industry the way it is now, no one would even consider opening anything in our area. The numbers just dont work. Your reasoning implies that we have already LOST the Battle in marketing our area and we should just shut up and accept fewer tourists. What a sad option.
Quote
 
 
+3 #14 Ron 2011-09-30 08:16
I am continually astonished at the mis-information and lack of understanding in some of these posts.

1. There are LESS hotel rooms today than there were 20 years ago. The idea that there are too many is crazy. Hotel occupancy and rates have performed well in the past and can again.

2. There is nothing wrong with our product and even if there were bike paths would not fix it. Tourists do not google search for bike paths.

3. Remember when people like Jack Tuttle and Bob Harris like to point the fingers at old hotels and natural disasters. There are 3 fingers pointing back at them.

4. CW does have a right to take care of their customers. The difference is that they do it with hotel and restaruant tax money under the guise of tourism promotion. Well it's not it's CW promotion. This is the most glaring example of taking from the poor to give to the rich that I have ever seen.

5. CW changed their strategy. They now prefer to have the affluent customer visit the town and hit them up for a donation to the endowment. This has caused a decline in HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF VISITORS. Let's bring back Mom & Dad and the 2 kids.

6. BG changed their strategy to regional travel and day drives. This has caused a decline in HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS OF VISITORS.

7. The chamber of commerce and the HTC have supported this idea of bolstering shoulder season and off season travel. The result was a disastrous summer season. Which is now causing foreclosures at numerous hotels.

8. We don't have measurable goals or a clear plan on how to achieve greater success. Heck, we don't even know with any level of certainty how many people come here each year.

I could continue for days but it wouldn't help. The simple fact of the matter is. People with good intentions tried their best and failed. Now it is time for a new approach and new ideas and quite frankly new people.

The thing these new people must do is increase demand. We have a great place for people to travel too. The infrastructure exists today. The employees are trained and the party is ready to begin. We just have to do a better job of sending out invitations.
Quote
 
 
-3 #13 Patriot 2011-09-29 19:12
JACK FRALEY supports this redundant EO zone, too.

Voters beware!
Quote
 
 
+2 #12 Sorry Jack 2011-09-29 15:10
There you go again, misleading everyone. The POSSIBILITY of hotel/motels in the EO Zone is by SUP only. Nothing, I repeat nothing in the EO Zone has been approved, because there is nothing to approve.
Quote
 
 
+4 #11 Jack 2011-09-29 13:43
... and to make matters worse, the JCC Supervisors Jones, Kennedy and Goodson just approved the inclusion of more hotels in the new Economic Opportunity Zone between Lightfoot and Croaker Roads. Just what y'all need: more competition just off the interstate.
Quote
 
 
0 #10 NE Triangle Res 2011-09-29 13:18
Quoting Not Surprised:
The whole eco-tourism initiative is a boondoogle. Sure there are some visitors who enjoy the great outdoors, but honestly folks, do you think just because you "build it they will come?"


You are wise to be cautious about any "build it they will come" idea. However, we have to take risks or we will stay in the same pattern of declining results. The question is how to get to where we are all pulling in the same direction. There is no boondoggle in the eco-tourism initiative, since there are no government funds supporting it.

Is the Colonial Parkway a boondoggle? No, it was a far-sighted economic development project to capitalize on private investments that were already being made to develop a tourism market here. And it has worked. What we need is a new generation of investment in the overall area experience, and the way families vacation has changed. They don't want to spend all their time in a car. With all the investments that have been made in infrastructure, adding green-ways as we maintain and upgrade roads and parks will be a catalyst for a attracting a new generation of visitors and residents.
Quote
 
 
+6 #9 randall 2011-09-29 13:01
It certainly isn’t very “collaborative” for CW to NOT submit their numbers. I mean surely they know the confusion they are causing by not participating with the other hotels. After all, they (CW) participated for years without any problems. Seems like CW stopped submitting numbers shortly after the chamber reorganized and it hired what-his-name.
Quote
 
 
+2 #8 Burger 2011-09-29 12:29
bottom line is there are too many hotels. Either bring something to williamsburg that will attract tourist or close'em down. The whole Busch and CW thing is it and has been for over 30 years. Have you ever been to Myrtle Beach. they have new attractions every year. We need something like Broadway at the beach that MB has, Hunts Farm would be a perfect place.
Quote
 
 
-1 #7 WYDaily Admin 2011-09-29 11:21
Not Surprised: Although Great Wolf Lodge is listed among the area hotels on the Smith Travel report, the report indicates that Great Wolf does not share its occupancy numbers.
Quote
 
 
-7 #6 Not Surprised 2011-09-29 10:55
The whole eco-tourism initiative is a boondoogle. Sure there are some visitors who enjoy the great outdoors, but honestly folks, do you think just because you "build it they will come?"
Quote
 

Add comment

WYDaily invites you to join the community conversation. We expect civil discourse here. Personal attacks on others, indecent language and bad manners in general are unwelcome.


Security code
Refresh

Talk of the Town

Talk of the Town