LeftColumnBK

JCC Unhappy With Road Surface Treatment

James City County sent a letter to the Virginia Department of Transportation this week complaining about pavement treatments put down recently and requesting VDOT stop using the material in the future.

The neighborhoods of Season’s Trace, The Colony, Kingswood and also some secondary streets such as Neck-O-Land Road were overlaid with surface treatment in the fall. Surface treatment is an asphalt-aggregate mix intended to extend the life of secondary roads before repavement is needed. VDOT said for the first few weeks, the product feels rough to drive on and sheds bits of gravel; the county says the roads have lots of excess gravel and are unsightly, and the county has asked VDOT to stop using the overlay.

In a letter addressed to Governor Bob McDonnell and sent to local General Assembly representatives and VDOT and transportation officials this week, County Administrator Robert Middaugh noted that the Board of Supervisors has received several complaints about the resurfacing treatments.

Complaints include: road conditions are rougher and noisier during the curing period (which can last several weeks); there is excess gravel on the side of the road that impedes walking and biking; the gravel runoff could negatively impact the environment; and the overlay kicks up debris that damages cars.

“In addition, residents feel this type of resurfacing detracts from their neighborhoods, not just functionally but aesthetically,” Middaugh wrote. “The look and feel of neighborhoods where this resurfacing was applied stands in stark contrast to its previous condition.”

In the fall, VDOT’s Williamsburg Residency Administrator Rossi Carroll told WYDaily that this type of surface treatment is very common in Virginia and has been used for a long time on secondary roads (read that story here).

The treatments were added to some county roads recently that were about 15 years old and showing signs of wear. This treatment extends the life of roads for another five to seven years and keeps them from having to be torn up and repaved, Carroll said.

“This type of resurfacing, while economically desirable for VDOT, is clearly inferior to what our citizens expect,” Middaugh wrote. “The Board requests that this type of resurfacing not be used in the future in James City County.”

The letter was precipitated by Supervisor John McGlennon, who received repeated complaints from a number of people in his district who had experience with the new treatment and asked the county to act on the issue.

Comments  

 
0 #3 Jadeneo 2012-04-17 20:41
They did ours in Seasons trace last year and it's still got the loose gravel on top. Dangerous for walking.. I watched them actually lay it and they had 2 trucks. 1 with the rocks and the other with the liquid tar. 2 coats - so 1 gravel then 1 tar, 1 gravel then another tar and it looked great, I though they were done, nice black road clean etc but then they came back over with the gravel truck and left?? it had me scratching my head??? Where was that last coat of liquid tar on top. It would have been fine if they had finished off with that..
Quote
 
 
+3 #2 kbar 2011-12-24 12:13
Gravel runnoff??? Seriously? Granite is about as inert as a rock can be. There are legitimate complaints listed in the letter, but to say that gravel runoff is one of them is an unnecessary exaggeration.
Quote
 
 
-1 #1 Mary Ann 2011-12-23 11:14
UNbelievable! The part about gravel runoff negatively impacting the environment really caught my attention. All of the neighborhoods mentioned are in near proximity to wetlands.
Quote
 

Add comment

WYDaily invites you to join the community conversation. We expect civil discourse here. Personal attacks on others, indecent language and bad manners in general are unwelcome.


Security code
Refresh

Talk of the Town

Talk of the Town