LeftColumnBK

Jamestown Student Voices Concern Over Freedom of Speech Violation

A Jamestown High School junior brought attention to a freedom of speech violation committed by the school’s interim principal at the School Board’s Jan. 17 meeting.

Landon Morrow told the board his club, One Desire, was singled out because it’s religious. He appeared at the meeting with a volunteer from the Alliance Defense Fund, an organization devoted to the legal defense of religious freedom.

In the days leading up to holiday break, student clubs and organizations were allowed to advertise their upcoming events with posters in the hallways. The posters had to be approved by the vice principal before being hung.

One Desire created a poster to promote its Christmas party, and received approval, but after the posters had been placed, Interim Principal Parke Land told the members they would need to remove them because the club was religious. He asked the students to distribute the posters by hand instead, Morrow said.

At Tuesday’s meeting, Morrow told the board, “It concerns me because it exposes you to a discrimination lawsuit.” He said he’d like the administration to remind employees of the rights guaranteed in the U.S. Constitution’s first amendment, which guarantees the free exercise of religion. He also said that if the problem was not addressed, he might have to consider taking the Alliance Defense Fund’s offer to represent One Desire in a lawsuit.

Although the Supreme Court decided a wall of separation must exist between church and state (including schools) in Everson v. Board of Education, students can still exercise free speech. WJCC spokesman Greg Davy said Morrow was right to express his concern.

“The organization is school-sanctioned, and materials noting meeting times can be posted after a standard in-school approval process,” he said, adding that the principal made an error in asking for the posters to be removed. Land resigned last week, citing health reasons.

Davy said the administration had, per Morrow’s suggestion, reminded high schools of the appropriate approval process for posted materials. Morrow’s father, Mark Morrow, commended Superintendent Steve Constantino for his quick response; he said Constantino wrote a personal note to his son after the meeting and reviewed the policies with the three high school principals.

Comments  

 
+1 #14 Wow, really? 2012-01-26 13:23
Quoting kbar:
I commend Mr. Morrow for stating his case and hope The Alliance Fund presses forward with their lawsuit even though I disagree with them. Freedom of religion also means freedom FROM religion. This club most assuredly has some outstanding young people as members and should be free to continue as a recognized club. However, the Christmas Party sponsored by a religious organization is clearly an effort to evangelize and witness to other students. Off school property, this is a perfectly reasonable thing to do. But it is not proper to promote a religious event on school property during school hours.
If a lawsuit is brought, they will lose and their loss will serve to reinforce legal precedence in this matter.



I'm dismayed and shocked by the negative reaction to this comment. I find it perfectly cogent and reasonable. Then again, Williamsburg isn't exactly a haven for open minds. Of course this club is valid and I support the efforts of the students, but it's imperative to protect the rights of ALL students. I support the process and outcome of the student and the School Board. This response is directed at the negative reactions to kbar's comment.
Quote
 
 
+1 #13 ThinkAboutIt 2012-01-26 13:15
Quoting Ron:
The Constitution does not require a wall of separation between church and state. There is no legal or historical or constitutional right to prejudicial actions against a religious club, statement, or activity in a public school. None. This was settled by many of the men who met in Jamestown as leaders in the original Virginia Colony and who helped give birth to liberty and the United States.



Sure, but could you perhaps extrapolate that idea. Those who settled this nation and helped shape early principles couldn't possibly conceive every possible scenario. Many weren't familiar with any faith other than Christianity nor any language other than "God," so how would the imagine something non-existent to them to preclude religious intolerance BY Christians of other faiths? Note that you reflected how "men" met as leaders. Were they also correct in excluding women because they couldn't conceive a world in which women were treated as equals?
Quote
 
 
+1 #12 Concerned 2012-01-26 10:26
Landon was guided wisely to inform the SB and open the way for change. As a long-time admirer of Principal Land as both an educator and administrator, it seems clear that the SBs earlier stance on this issue was unclear or poorly communicated to our good Principals. Nice to see it resolved so appropriately.
Quote
 
 
0 #11 History 2012-01-25 16:47
The Anglican Church was the official church of Virginia and attendance at it's Sunday services was compulsory until the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom was passed in 1786, There was no concept of religious freedom at Jamestown.

I think it's great that Landon wanted to make sure that the schools don't violate the First Amendment. That's where our kids are supposed to learn about their rights as citizens.
Quote
 
 
+5 #10 Just Sayin..... 2012-01-25 15:44
To Ron,
While it is true that the settlers at Jamestown set the precedent for several American traditions and rights, religious freedom and tolerance were certainly not among them. These people were 100% Church of England members, no questions asked. If a group of the people had decided they wanted to conduct a Catholic mass, let alone mentioned the terms Jewish or Muslim, they would have faced serious consequences.
Quote
 
 
0 #9 Bob 2012-01-25 14:52
There have been concerted attempts to banish freedom of religion under the guise of separation of church from state. The Constitution actually reads: Bill of Rights, Amendment 1: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.
Quote
 
 
-4 #8 Ron 2012-01-25 13:18
The Constitution does not require a wall of separation between church and state. There is no legal or historical or constitutional right to prejudicial actions against a religious club, statement, or activity in a public school. None. This was settled by many of the men who met in Jamestown as leaders in the original Virginia Colony and who helped give birth to liberty and the United States.
Quote
 
 
+6 #7 Eliz 2012-01-25 12:04
A poster announcing an event is not proselytizing. Our constitutionall y recognized right to the free exercise of our religion permits students of any religion or a-religion to gather together freely, even on school property. If this group had been Muslim or Jewish or Baha'i or Sikh or Hindu or atheist, the principle still applies. And the principal should recognize and maintain the students' constitutionall y recognized and legitimate rights.
Quote
 
 
+7 #6 Henry David T. 2012-01-25 11:16
So true about the separation of church and state. However, in separating church and state one must realize that the state is represented in school by the teachers and admin. Morrow has a right to practice his religion. However, the problem seems to be a lack of procedure.
Quote
 
 
-16 #5 kbar 2012-01-25 11:08
I commend Mr. Morrow for stating his case and hope The Alliance Fund presses forward with their lawsuit even though I disagree with them. Freedom of religion also means freedom FROM religion. This club most assuredly has some outstanding young people as members and should be free to continue as a recognized club. However, the Christmas Party sponsored by a religious organization is clearly an effort to evangelize and witness to other students. Off school property, this is a perfectly reasonable thing to do. But it is not proper to promote a religious event on school property during school hours.
If a lawsuit is brought, they will lose and their loss will serve to reinforce legal precedence in this matter.
Quote
 

Add comment

WYDaily invites you to join the community conversation. We expect civil discourse here. Personal attacks on others, indecent language and bad manners in general are unwelcome.


Security code
Refresh

Talk of the Town

Talk of the Town