LeftColumnBK

House OK's Stricter Voter ID Laws as Hundreds Protest

RICHMOND - Several hundred citizens joined Democratic officials and civil rights leaders at the Capitol on Tuesday to rally against bills they say would suppress the voting rights of minorities, elderly people and low-income Virginians.

The bills would require Virginia residents to present identification, such as a birth certificate or driver’s license, before voting. Some Democrats charge that Republicans are pushing for the changes to target Virginians who likely would vote Democratic.

“We know that these voter suppression activities are designed with a strategic purpose in mind,” said Richmond Mayor Dwight C. Jones. “This is a systemic approach to suppressing the voting power of those who turned Virginia blue in 2008,” when the state supported Barack Obama for president.

The rally involved several political organizations, including the Virginia Legislative Black Caucus and the Democratic caucuses of the House and Senate. They were joined by groups such as the AFL-CIO, the NAACP, the Virginia Poverty Law Center, the Sierra Club and the AARP, the major advocacy group for older Americans.

Also at the protest were U.S. Rep. Robert C. “Bobby” Scott of Newport News and civil rights leader Benjamin Chavis, who was an assistant to the Rev. Martin Luther King and served as head of the NAACP.

Chavis said the proposals evoke Jim Crow days, when whites used poll taxes and other intimidation to prevent blacks from voting.

“This is the New South,” he told the crowd. “Some people over there in the [General Assembly] building – that’s the Old South.”

Demonstrators surrounded the Bell Tower at the southwest corner of Capitol Square at 10 a.m. They wore stickers that read “Protect Our Vote! We Can’t Afford To Go Backwards” and hoisted signs. Prayer and song preceded and followed several speakers.

“Since 1965, we have made every effort to expand the right to vote, to make it easier to vote. But now we’re seeing people turn back the clock,” said Sen. John S. Edwards, D-Roanoke. “They say there’s widespread voter fraud. Where is the evidence? It does not exist.”

Republicans say that the proposals would guard against voter fraud. Under current law, someone without a voter registration card or other identification can vote by signing an affidavit that “he is the named registered voter who he claims to be.”

The rally did not sway the House of Delegates. On Wednesday, delegates voted 69-30 in favor of House Bill 9, which says that voters who can’t show identification must cast a “provisional ballot”; the provisional ballot would be counted after the election if officials verify the voter’s identity.

Local delegates Mike Watson, Gordon Helsel and Brenda Pogge voted in favor of the bill.

“The legislation debated today will cause confusion at the polls, deter lawful voters from voting, and create chaos for our already stressed election officials,” said Delegate Mark Sickles of Franconia, who chairs the House Democratic Caucus. “A clear and convincing reason why these bills are needed has yet to be articulated in committee or on the floor.”

However, Delegate David Albo, R-Fairfax, said critics of HB 9 are making false claims about the bill.

“Most people who are against it are saying it denies people the right to vote. They need to read the bill – it does not deny anyone the right to vote,” Albo said. “If they don’t have an ID, they vote a provisional ballot. All provisional ballots are counted as long as it is not determined that the vote is fraudulent. So, everyone’s vote still gets counted.”

Democrats also criticized Senate Bill 1, which would eliminate the voter registration card from the list of acceptable forms of identification that Virginians can show to prove they are registered voters.

Under SB 1, a voter would have to show a Social Security card, a driver’s license, a government identification card or an employee ID card with a photo – or else cast a provisional ballot.

Opponents say SB 1 would discourage many people from voting. They said, for example, that elderly Virginians may not have a birth certificate or driver’s license.

“It undermines the very foundation of our democracy, the right to vote,” said Brian Moran, chairman of the Democratic Party of Virginia.

“The right to vote is fundamental to our democracy. We should be encouraging and expanding the opportunities to engage in our democracy through the vote – not suppressing, not limiting, not being a country of exclusion, but rather of inclusion.”

However, Sen. Steve Martin, R-Chesterfield, who is sponsoring SB 1, said the rally speakers were “nowhere close to correct.”

“You might want to make sure you look at the actual bill and see the expansions of opportunities. You do not need a photo ID. That’s not a requirement. It’s nothing at all like what has been represented, and it’s probably going to fair very well on the floor of the Senate,” Martin said.

Many Republicans say the bills are intended to prevent voter fraud, but Democrats say voter fraud hasn’t been a problem in Virginia.

By supporting such bills as HB 9 and SB 1, legislators are sending a message to the people, said Tram Nguyen, associate director of Virginia New Majority, which advocates for minorities, women and “progressive people” in general.

“That message is that while we don’t have enough money in our state budget to fund programs that we so desperately need – like education, our health safety and public safety – they’re willing to spend millions of our taxpayer dollars to fix a program that doesn’t exist,” Nguyen said.

One attendee at the rally – Chuck Hawkins of Manquin, a town in King William County – said Republicans want to suppress voter turnout because a higher turnout favors Democrats. “It’s a way to keep people from coming to the polls that would otherwise exercise their right.”

Mayor Jones vowed that Democrats would not let that happen.

“We’re not going to stand by quietly and allow these things to happen without bringing public attention to them,” he said.

“It’s my right to vote. I will not have to give my birth certificate. I will not have to show my driver’s license. All I ought to do is show up.”

Comments  

 
-6 #9 Jim 2012-02-03 11:10
1. No one has presented any data that shows even a minor voter fraud problem in Virginia.

2. The cost of handling the provisional ballots will not be negligible.

3. The biggest problem with these bills is the undue burden placed on the poor and elderly, not so much due to the kinds of ID that are acceptable, but due to the need to vote with a provisional ballot if one has forgotten his/her ID. The burden is actually in the later work that has to be done to validate the provisional ballot. Most of us have forgotten our ID at one time or another. If I forget my ID, it would be rather easy for me to scan an ID at home and email the information to the electoral office. For someone who is poor and/or without easy access to a scanner and computer or a fax machine, the ID would need to be delivered in person (most of us would not trust the USPS with mail that is this important). This is an undue hardship for those without a car, the elderly who no longer drive, and the working poor who have two jobs and don't have time and/or transportation to the electoral office. It is hard to imagine that the courts will let this stand. Do we really need to waste the Commonwealth's time and money fighting for legislation that will have such a negative effect on our reputation?
Quote
 
 
+6 #8 Why? 2012-02-02 18:21
Why must our laws always be in Response to a situation-gone- wrong? Why not be Pro-Active and avoid problems? What are the opponents to an ID fearful of? why am I a 'racist' if I think it is only common sense to show an ID?! I must show a picture ID to get a library card! Enough of this class-warfare: those who work hard and/or save their money deserve their monetary rewards. I do not envy them their success. I live in an older neighborhood of $200,000 houses, not a gated community.I am Fed up to the gills with all the talk of 'classes'---We are AMERICANS some poor, some moderate, some wealthy!
Quote
 
 
-7 #7 Citizen 2012-02-02 13:43
Quoting Dr Gus:
The voter-ID protest is too clever by half. The assertions are attempts to rally, pursuade, and class-divide, the public. This amounts to the personification of cognitive dissonance: The protest is a red-herring to engage the otherwise, now non-engaged Left. The disapointed liberal base recognizes the many failures of big and growing government, new entitlement spending and taxes. All the while Liberals are gining-up,the get-out-the-vote of its'now,dischanted 2008-voters.


So glad that Governor Romney has avoided the "class-divide." To him, there's only the upper class. All others, he doesn't worry about since there's a safety net. LOL. :-x
Quote
 
 
+11 #6 Dr Gus 2012-02-02 13:16
The voter-ID protest is too clever by half. The assertions are attempts to rally, pursuade, and class-divide, the public. This amounts to the personification of cognitive dissonance: The protest is a red-herring to engage the otherwise, now non-engaged Left. The disapointed liberal base recognizes the many failures of big and growing government, new entitlement spending and taxes. All the while Liberals are gining-up,the get-out-the-vot e of its'now,dischan ted 2008-voters.
Quote
 
 
-8 #5 Veteran 2012-02-02 13:15
Answer the simple question, Delegates Pogge and Watson.

Is there voter fraud currently?

No need for GOP fear-mongering if the question is answered.
Quote
 
 
-13 #4 Really 2012-02-02 12:41
I worked as a poll cheif for elections trhoughout the 1990s in James City County. With more neighbors from the election district as election officers it was unlikey that there was fraud. However since the current cheif arrived and recuited officers at the local Christain schools there is non-longer one neighbor/reside nt at my polling place. Yet even with my driver licensed I have been harrassed about not having my maiden name on my license to match the poll book.

During the 2008 election the machines jammed with the wet ballots. The lines were long, and inhibited by silly incidents like maiden names for women and the loss of a ballot machine for three hours. After the pools closed 1500 ballots were hand counted. the observers from both parties were required to observe form 35 feet away. the count was off on three occasions and was only reconciled on the fifth attempt. There is less likeihood of fraud and more of errors by overtired election officers and problem machines and ballots.

If we want to have all citizens vote than the registrar should be able to provide a free Id for each registered voter, or else they should organize an county id days like we do for children Ident a voter.

Anything else smells like the Politburo or Jim Crow. Shame on Watson, Pogge and Helsel.
Quote
 
 
+5 #3 Oyster Man 2012-02-02 11:34
You need to identify yourself to (1) use a credit card (2) obtain a library card (3) buy beer or cigarettes (4) obtain the privilege of driving on state roads. Why would we think it is not a good idea to identify ourselves for the right of casting our ballot?

And Veteran, review the topic yourself. There are numerous registered voters that are (1) dead and gone (2) fictitious names (3) invalid addresses. Hopefully next time you go to the pole to vote, someone using your name has not appeared before you get there.
Quote
 
 
-9 #2 Veteran 2012-02-02 10:46
Are there documented cases of voter fraud in recent elections that have warranted this particular action? While budget and education needs are pressing issues, are we being sidetracked by possible non-issues?

Tell us, Delegates Pogge and Watson. We would like to know if there is voter fraud currently.
Quote
 
 
+10 #1 Bren 2012-02-02 10:04
Thousands, not hundreds, would vote "for identification" if on the ballot.
Quote
 

Add comment

WYDaily invites you to join the community conversation. We expect civil discourse here. Personal attacks on others, indecent language and bad manners in general are unwelcome.


Security code
Refresh

Talk of the Town

Talk of the Town